|
[integration-dev] [ODL Discuss] [tsc] Proposal to archive inactive projects.
+1 Ivan Od: integration-dev@... <integration-dev@...> v mene používateľa Anil Belur <abelur@...> Odoslané: sobota, 1. októbra 2022 9:24:51 Komu: Robert Varga Kópia: TSC; 'integration-dev@...' (integra
+1 Ivan Od: integration-dev@... <integration-dev@...> v mene používateľa Anil Belur <abelur@...> Odoslané: sobota, 1. októbra 2022 9:24:51 Komu: Robert Varga Kópia: TSC; 'integration-dev@...' (integra
|
By
Ivan Hrasko
·
|
|
[tsc] Proposal to archive inactive projects.
5 messages
Hello TSC: The list of $projects (and last activity on the repo) are inactive for the last ~2 release cycles and good candidates for project archival. - l2switch: Apr, 2021 - dlux: Sept, 2020 - dluxap
Hello TSC: The list of $projects (and last activity on the repo) are inactive for the last ~2 release cycles and good candidates for project archival. - l2switch: Apr, 2021 - dlux: Sept, 2020 - dluxap
|
By
Anil Belur
·
|
|
ONAP/ODL Integration Sync
2 messages
ONAP/ODL Integration Sync Team, At tomorrow's meeting, I'd like to discuss ODL integration with the ONAP London release in 1Q23. This will be similar to what we did for the ONAP Kohn release, which su
ONAP/ODL Integration Sync Team, At tomorrow's meeting, I'd like to discuss ODL integration with the ONAP London release in 1Q23. This will be similar to what we did for the ONAP Kohn release, which su
|
By
David McBride
·
|
|
[OpenDaylight TSC] [tsc] Proposal to archive inactive projects.
3 messages
+1 வெள்., 30 செப்., 2022, முற்பகல் 10:56 அன்று, Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...> எழுதியது: -- Venkatrangan Govindarajan ( When there is no wind...Row )
+1 வெள்., 30 செப்., 2022, முற்பகல் 10:56 அன்று, Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...> எழுதியது: -- Venkatrangan Govindarajan ( When there is no wind...Row )
|
By
Venkatrangan Govindarajan
·
|
|
[OpenDaylight TSC] Relevancy of branch locks during the release process
2 messages
I tend to agree. The branch lock is relevant only to MSI projects at this point. Those projects do not even have what I would call active committers (with the notable exception on OFP). Meanwhile the
I tend to agree. The branch lock is relevant only to MSI projects at this point. Those projects do not even have what I would call active committers (with the notable exception on OFP). Meanwhile the
|
By
Robert Varga
·
|
|
Relevancy of branch locks during the release process
Hello As discussed during the TSC meeting of 7th July, I'd like to challenge the relevancy of branch locks during releases processes. In my opinion they have more cons than pros today. I agree they us
Hello As discussed during the TSC meeting of 7th July, I'd like to challenge the relevancy of branch locks during releases processes. In my opinion they have more cons than pros today. I agree they us
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
|
|
ONE Summit CFP reminder
Hello OpenDaylight Community, ONE Summit North America, LFN’s flagship event, returns in-person, November 15-16 in Seattle, WA (followed by the Fall LFN Developer & Testing Forum Nov. 17-18)! Speaking
Hello OpenDaylight Community, ONE Summit North America, LFN’s flagship event, returns in-person, November 15-16 in Seattle, WA (followed by the Fall LFN Developer & Testing Forum Nov. 17-18)! Speaking
|
By
Casey Cain
·
|
|
The road to Java 17
3 messages
Hello everyone, as you might have noticed, Java 17 has been released: https://jdk.java.net/17/ with reference implementation here: https://jdk.java.net/java-se-ri/17 OpenDaylight currently requires Ja
Hello everyone, as you might have noticed, Java 17 has been released: https://jdk.java.net/17/ with reference implementation here: https://jdk.java.net/java-se-ri/17 OpenDaylight currently requires Ja
|
By
Robert Varga
·
|
|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Phosphorus SR3 release status
3 messages
Hello All, OpenDaylight Phosphorus SR3 version bump is complete and the staging repository has been promoted. The 'stable/phosphorus' branch remains unlocked and ready for development. Pending activit
Hello All, OpenDaylight Phosphorus SR3 version bump is complete and the staging repository has been promoted. The 'stable/phosphorus' branch remains unlocked and ready for development. Pending activit
|
By
Anil Belur
·
|
|
ODL starting with pipelines
Hi Mario: I've CC-ed the discuss and TSC list in case anyone wants to join the call. Cheers, ab ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Mário Doman <Mario.Doman@...> Date: Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:
Hi Mario: I've CC-ed the discuss and TSC list in case anyone wants to join the call. Cheers, ab ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Mário Doman <Mario.Doman@...> Date: Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:
|
By
Anil Belur
·
|
|
ONAP/ODL Integration Sync
Reminder - we are having an important discussion today regarding the licensing for RESTCONF. Please see the agenda for additional details: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/pAJzB Please attend if you're
Reminder - we are having an important discussion today regarding the licensing for RESTCONF. Please see the agenda for additional details: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/pAJzB Please attend if you're
|
By
David McBride
·
|
|
ODL with BAA and sysrepo - Indentity-reference attribute issues.
3 messages
Hi, We are trying to use ODL in our Ems project to provide the Retconf NBI and the Netconf-connector features. The following is the topology of our implementation. ODLàOB-BAAàSysrepo(Device Netconf se
Hi, We are trying to use ODL in our Ems project to provide the Retconf NBI and the Netconf-connector features. The following is the topology of our implementation. ODLàOB-BAAàSysrepo(Device Netconf se
|
By
P, Thirumurugan
·
|
|
[kernel-dev] ONAP/ODL Integration Sync
4 messages
So essentially we have agreed that ONAP/ccsdk should be taking ownership of the distribution ODL is providing. Barring the daexim dependency, which is an ODL MSI project due to the committers to makin
So essentially we have agreed that ONAP/ccsdk should be taking ownership of the distribution ODL is providing. Barring the daexim dependency, which is an ODL MSI project due to the committers to makin
|
By
Robert Varga
·
|
|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Sulfur release status
10 messages
Hello All, OpenDaylight Sulfur version bump is complete and the staging repository has been promoted. The 'stable/sulfur' branch is unlocked and ready for development. Pending activities required to b
Hello All, OpenDaylight Sulfur version bump is complete and the staging repository has been promoted. The 'stable/sulfur' branch is unlocked and ready for development. Pending activities required to b
|
By
Anil Belur
·
|
|
[integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Sulfur release status
The patch is using openjdk11 also for chlorine? Is that correct? I was expecting openjdk 17. Best, Ivan Od: integration-dev@... <integration-dev@...> v mene používateľa Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> Odoslan
The patch is using openjdk11 also for chlorine? Is that correct? I was expecting openjdk 17. Best, Ivan Od: integration-dev@... <integration-dev@...> v mene používateľa Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> Odoslan
|
By
Ivan Hrasko
·
|
|
[integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Sulfur release status
Please review the following CR that adds a new job for chlorine stream on JDK17/CentOS8. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/101020
Please review the following CR that adds a new job for chlorine stream on JDK17/CentOS8. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/101020
|
By
Anil Belur
·
|
|
[integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Sulfur release status
IIRC openjdk17 is going to be supported for chlorine, while the release was approved with openjdk11. We only have a single AR job that is building with openjdk11 for Chlorine, we should probably chang
IIRC openjdk17 is going to be supported for chlorine, while the release was approved with openjdk11. We only have a single AR job that is building with openjdk11 for Chlorine, we should probably chang
|
By
Anil Belur
·
|
|
Pure Netconf Server (Northbound) usage of Opendaylight
Hi, For our project, we want to use netconf server solution of Opendaylight, however we want to use it purely, meaning that we just want to access, send requests and get operational data, made configu
Hi, For our project, we want to use netconf server solution of Opendaylight, however we want to use it purely, meaning that we just want to access, send requests and get operational data, made configu
|
By
Guray Baydur
·
|
|
Old RESTCONF northbound scheduled for removal
3 messages
Hello everyone, as you might be aware, OpenDaylight ships two versions of RESTCONF northbound. The first is the all-familiar implementation of draft-bierman-netconf-restconf-02, available at localhost
Hello everyone, as you might be aware, OpenDaylight ships two versions of RESTCONF northbound. The first is the all-familiar implementation of draft-bierman-netconf-restconf-02, available at localhost
|
By
Robert Varga
·
|
|
transportPCE and gnpy
3 messages
Hello, we try to find out how gnpy and transportpce are working together, since we found some commits and presentations with this. My question is: Is there a documentation how to get this working toge
Hello, we try to find out how gnpy and transportpce are working together, since we found some commits and presentations with this. My question is: Is there a documentation how to get this working toge
|
By
Michael D?rre
·
|