Re: Moving from to

Eric Ball <eball@...>

All: I'm going to abandon the previously-linked patch request, and break it out into separate commits by project.

Robert: I've updated the Sonarcloud user permissions to match SonarQube, where all registered users can administer issues. As for the history import, it is not supported. We will have to leave the history behind.

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 3:24 PM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 06/11/2019 23:01, Eric Ball wrote:
> You can view the OpenDaylight Sonarcloud page
> here:
> Currently, the only projects showing results are those that have run and
> passed on the sandbox. Once the change is merged, all projects will show
> results after their next successful run.
> You may notice that while quantitative numbers like code coverage and
> duplication haven't changed, the number of bugs/vulnerabilities/code
> smells may have changed significantly (most likely an increase). This is
> due to Sonarcloud using much more up-to-date Quality Profiles than ODL's
> SonarQube instance, so this should be considered an improvement in
> results (even though I understand that it can be a pain to suddenly have
> a backlog of issues where there were few or none before). These profiles
> can be customized, so if anyone sees something coming up that absolutely
> should not be in the results, we can remove it from the Quality Profile.
> Please let me know if you have any questions, or if you'd like to bring
> this up for discussion during the next TSC meeting.

Another thing: there seems to be no historical data available. I would
hate to lose the 4+ years of data accumulated in

What is being done about that?


Join { to automatically receive all group messages.