On 13/11/2019 01:28, Anil Belur wrote:

Hi Abhijit: 

Please add this thread to the week's TSC call agenda and possibly take a
vote on this. 

1. ODL Projects needs to vote (+1) before each of these change can be
merged on releng/builder.
    https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/85644

That patch has been abandoned for a per-project migration (on Andy's
request).

Furthermore, as I noted in the review, we really should duplicate the
sonar jobs, so we can actually evaluate how the projects work with
SonarCloud before ...

2. Agree upon a time when Sonarcube (https://sonar.opendaylight.org
<https://sonar.opendaylight.org/>) can be decommissioned. Please note,
Sonarcloud has better features and language support than SonarQube, and
also remove the hosting and maintenance costs associated with the
SonarQube server.

... we decide on this.

Regards,
Robert

Thanks,
Anil

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:02 AM Eric Ball <eball@...
<mailto:eball@...>> wrote:

Hello all,

We here at the LF Release Engineering team are working on a move
from hosted SonarQube instances to the cloud-based Sonarcloud
service. To that end, there is currently a proposed change to all
Sonar jobs that would move them to
Sonarcloud: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/85644

Sonarcloud has more features and better language support than
SonarQube, and it will remove the hosting and maintenance costs
associated with the SonarQube server. Our plan is to decommission
the SonarQube server about a month after we make the move to Sonarcloud.

You can view the OpenDaylight Sonarcloud page
here: https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/opendaylight/projects
Currently, the only projects showing results are those that have run
and passed on the sandbox. Once the change is merged, all projects
will show results after their next successful run.

You may notice that while quantitative numbers like code coverage
and duplication haven't changed, the number of
bugs/vulnerabilities/code smells may have changed significantly
(most likely an increase). This is due to Sonarcloud using much more
up-to-date Quality Profiles than ODL's SonarQube instance, so this
should be considered an improvement in results (even though I
understand that it can be a pain to suddenly have a backlog of
issues where there were few or none before). These profiles can be
customized, so if anyone sees something coming up that absolutely
should not be in the results, we can remove it from the Quality Profile.

Please let me know if you have any questions, or if you'd like to
bring this up for discussion during the next TSC meeting.

Note: ovsdb is using a custom Sonar template. This will need to be
changed to work with Sonarcloud, or (preferably) changed to use
global-jjb templates. If there's something our global-jjb jobs do
not currently support, we should be able to add that functionality.

Eric Ball
Release Engineer
The Linux Foundation
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12181):
https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/message/12181
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/44622856/1278122
Group Owner: TSC+owner@...
<mailto:TSC%2Bowner@...>
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/unsub 
[abelur@... <mailto:abelur@...>]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12218): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/message/12218
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/44622856/1320659
Group Owner: TSC+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/unsub [nite@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-