Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] How to handle DLUX & Projects Under the TSC Purview ?
toggle quoted message Show quoted text
OK - so we seem to have either a broad approval or at least no-objection for the topics I sent. I have consolidated inputs from Robert, Jamo, etc. + some changes from my side. The changes are below in a different font color. I will let you folks comment on the changes for a couple of days and even continue the discussion in the TSC meeting if needed. I will then initiate a vote afterwards.
Topic 1: What are the criteria to have a project under the TSC purview?
The minimum criteria is:
Topic 2: Should the TSC be committers on a project under TSC purview?
Topic 3: Does the TSC agree that DLUX should be under the TSC purview?
Topic 4: Does the TSC agree that L2Switch should be under the TSC purview?
Once we decide by a vote, I will create a page under confluence for the policy for putting a project under TSC purview. I believe Jamo's point on putting a project under TSC purview after a single release of zero activity is covered under the bullet of no active committers for the project. This will give the TSC the flexibility to add a project under the purview if there are no active committers without waiting for a full release of inactivity. However if you folks think that it would be better to avoid this flexibility to avoid TSC overreach - we can put in explicitly the one release inactivity requirement.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 4:04 PM Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote: