On 13/11/2019 01:28, Anil Belur wrote:
> Hi Abhijit: 
>
> Please add this thread to the week's TSC call agenda and possibly take a
> vote on this. 
>
> 1. ODL Projects needs to vote (+1) before each of these change can be
> merged on releng/builder.
>     https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/85644

That patch has been abandoned for a per-project migration (on Andy's
request).

Furthermore, as I noted in the review, we really should duplicate the
sonar jobs, so we can actually evaluate how the projects work with
SonarCloud before ...


> 2. Agree upon a time when Sonarcube (https://sonar.opendaylight.org
> <https://sonar.opendaylight.org/>) can be decommissioned. Please note,
> Sonarcloud has better features and language support than SonarQube, and
> also remove the hosting and maintenance costs associated with the
> SonarQube server.

... we decide on this.

Regards,
Robert



>
> Thanks,
> Anil
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:02 AM Eric Ball <eball@...
> <mailto:eball@...>> wrote:
>
>     Hello all,
>
>     We here at the LF Release Engineering team are working on a move
>     from hosted SonarQube instances to the cloud-based Sonarcloud
>     service. To that end, there is currently a proposed change to all
>     Sonar jobs that would move them to
>     Sonarcloud: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/85644
>
>     Sonarcloud has more features and better language support than
>     SonarQube, and it will remove the hosting and maintenance costs
>     associated with the SonarQube server. Our plan is to decommission
>     the SonarQube server about a month after we make the move to Sonarcloud.
>
>     You can view the OpenDaylight Sonarcloud page
>     here: https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/opendaylight/projects
>     Currently, the only projects showing results are those that have run
>     and passed on the sandbox. Once the change is merged, all projects
>     will show results after their next successful run.
>
>     You may notice that while quantitative numbers like code coverage
>     and duplication haven't changed, the number of
>     bugs/vulnerabilities/code smells may have changed significantly
>     (most likely an increase). This is due to Sonarcloud using much more
>     up-to-date Quality Profiles than ODL's SonarQube instance, so this
>     should be considered an improvement in results (even though I
>     understand that it can be a pain to suddenly have a backlog of
>     issues where there were few or none before). These profiles can be
>     customized, so if anyone sees something coming up that absolutely
>     should not be in the results, we can remove it from the Quality Profile.
>
>     Please let me know if you have any questions, or if you'd like to
>     bring this up for discussion during the next TSC meeting.
>
>     Note: ovsdb is using a custom Sonar template. This will need to be
>     changed to work with Sonarcloud, or (preferably) changed to use
>     global-jjb templates. If there's something our global-jjb jobs do
>     not currently support, we should be able to add that functionality.
>
>     Eric Ball
>     Release Engineer
>     The Linux Foundation
>     -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>     Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>
>     View/Reply Online (#12181):
>     https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/message/12181
>     Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/44622856/1278122
>     Group Owner: TSC+owner@...
>     <mailto:TSC%2Bowner@...>
>     Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/unsub 
>     [abelur@... <mailto:abelur@...>]
>     -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>
> View/Reply Online (#12218): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/message/12218
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/44622856/1320659
> Group Owner: TSC+owner@...
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/unsub  [nite@...]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>