Please continue the governance discussion here so we can reach concrete proposals for TSC vote. I personally do not see difference between "5 seats now + 2 seats later" vs "5 seats now and new TSC will review the TSC composition once there are more committers and engagement in the community".

BR/Luis

On Oct 15, 2020, at 9:52 PM, Casey Cain <ccain@...> wrote:

I have created a draft proposal for TSC Election Process here:

https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/0BQF

We can discuss this at tonight's TSC meeting.  

Best,

Casey Cain

Technical Program Manager / Community Architect

Linux Foundation

_________________

IRC: CaseyLF

WeChat: okaru6

Voice: +1.408.641.0193

Book a Meeting w/ Casey

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:38 AM Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote:

+1, the simpler, the better.

On Oct 13, 2020, at 10:53 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote:

Hi Casey,

My suggestion is to keep it simple:

1. Keep it to be a 5 member TSC - all Committer-at-large.

2. Conduct elections as before - same timeline - so the new TSC is in by December 1st week.

3. If there are more members interested & eligible in early February, at that point the TSC can decide whether to add a couple of seats or keep the existing number of seats but refresh the entire TSC or any other option including no changes.

4. Conduct by-elections or elections based on what is decided in step 3.

This way we take things one step at a time and most decisions are made by the new TSC rather than the current TSC.

Thanks,

Abhijit

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:24 PM Casey Cain <ccain@...> wrote:

Hello, everyone.

On yesterday's TSC meeting there was a discussion about restructuring the TSC.  There have been a few suggestions and I would like to take this opportunity to present some of the current proposals and open the floor to other recommendations. The current election mechanics can be found here. The main areas of discussion have been around the timing of the election and the number of seats that should be available.  I have listed some of the current suggestions below:

1. Timing - The timing of the election could possibly provide an opportunity for newer contributors to the community an opportunity to become committers and take on new leadership roles.  The currently suggested options are:
1. Open the election self-nomination period on October 22nd for 2 weeks as currently scheduled
2. Open the election self-nomination period but extend the time of self-nomination until late November, early December, or the new year
3. Elect #x seats as scheduled, differ #x seats for election in the new year
4. Delay the election until the new year 
2. Size of the TSC - The community has suggested that the TSC be resized to better reflect the active development community.
1. No changes.  The TSC size remains at 11 seats.
2. Reduce the size of the TSC to 5 seats, 3 for Managed Projects, 2 for CaL.
3. Reduce the size of the TSC to 3 seats, Committers-at-Large (CaL)
4. Reduce the size of the TSC to 5 seats
1. 3 Seats reserved for managed projects, election held now
2. 2 seats reserved for Committers-at-Large, differed to Jan/Feb 2021 to allow an opportunity for new Contributors to become eligible for the TSC.

Please provide your feedback.

Best,

Casey Cain

Technical Program Manager / Community Architect

Linux Foundation

_________________

IRC: CaseyLF

WeChat: okaru6

Voice: +1.408.641.0193

Book a Meeting w/ Casey