On 15/11/2021 20:22, Robert Varga wrote:
> On 15/11/2021 17:54, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:36 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>
> The bgpcep regression (https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988)
> is tricky, as it seems we turned around a rock under which it was hiding
> for couple of years.
>
> Nevertheless I think we have a pretty good idea as to what is going on
> and should be able to clear that in the next few days.
>
> Anyway, I am rolling out an update to get the things we have now into
> wider testing.

Alright, so BGPCEP-988 is confirmed passing in a Sulfur, thanks to Marek
and Olivier for tracking it down and fixing it.

With bgpcep-0.16.11 we are back to passing completely here:
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/bgpcep-csit-1node-userfeatures-all-sulfur/

The corresponding Phosphorus job's manual runs seem to be mismatching on
distro name somehow, but the next AR should be fine AFAICT.

Regards,
Robert