Hi Robert, Daniel: 

The issue is not with the baseline image, rather due to the absence of the openstack tools/libs set in the $PATH program

since the system python packages are not up-to-date with the PyPi dependencies, we'll have had to move with

pyenv (much more efficient) while dealing with recent version{s} of Python 3.X. 

This is already resolved in global-jjb v0.80.2, however, there is a residual set of code scattered around

in the integration jobs/ (and long scripts) which is generally maintained by Luis and integration folks (Luis), 

which also needs an update.

Ex: 

https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blob/master/jjb/integration/integration-deploy-openstack-run-test.sh 

I've updated some parts of the integration scripts, would be good to test these on the sandbox.

CC: Liuis

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102298

- ab

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:41 PM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:

On 31/08/2022 03:04, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
> Robert and all,
>
> it looks like we are still having some issues in Sulfur integration
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
>
>
> Please let me know if it is ok to pick a RC despite these bgpcep and ofp
> issues

There seems to be a problem with the baseline image -- tests are failing
across the board and across releases due to 'openstack' not being installed.

Not sure how to fix this.

Bye,
Robert

>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:41 AM Daniel de la Rosa via
> lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org>
> <ddelarosa0707=gmail.com@...
> <mailto:gmail.com@...>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:50 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>     <mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
>
>         On 20/08/2022 01:10, Robert Varga wrote:
>          > On 18/08/2022 16:36, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >> Hello TSC and all... As mentioned in the other email thread,
>         we are
>          >> going to skip the code freeze from now on and move forward
>         to pick a
>          >> RC for Sulfur SR2. At this point, it doesn't look like we
>         are ready to
>          >> pick an RC based of what I'm seeing here but @Robert Varga
>          >> <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>> please correct me if
>         I'm wrong
>          >>
>          >>
>         https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
>          >>
>         <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>>
>          >>
>          >
>          > Actually MRI projects have not been update since May due to
>         all the
>          > churn required to get 2022.09 back on regular release schedule.
>          >
>          > The critical issue here is
>          > https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436
>         <https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436>, which has
>         been
>          > resolved this week, so I am spinning releases out -- BUT!
>          >
>          > This means catching up with backports across the board, so
>         this might
>          > take up to a week (or more (*)).
>
>         This is all done now.
>
>
>     Great, thanks! I'll pick a Sulfur SR2 RC on monday 8/29
>
>
>
>         Regards,
>         Robert
>
>