odlforge proposals
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
Andy, Chris,
By adding at the top a set of questions that need to be answered for us to proceed on odlforge in an orderly way,
and adding a proposed set of answers for them at the bottom.
Please fill in any questions that have been missed.
I also added a proposal at the bottom answering those questions (its intentionally separate from the questions, because
I was trying to pose the questions in a manner so as not to bias the answers to them).
I think we can probably find agreement easily on #5,8,9,10,11
I think we may be able to find agreement easily on with:
#2,4,6,7 (these I think *mostly* differ from Andy's proposal in suggestion of naming, and its unclear to me
how strongly he feels there)
how strongly he feels there)
I think we may have some work to do to come together on a compromise for
#0,1,3
But my sense is that it would be most productive to work through the easier to agree stuff first.
Thoughts?
Ed