Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
David Meyer <dmm@...>
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Benson Schliesser <bensons@...> wrote:
All, thanks for the thoughts.
A few comments: First, I don't want to see any TSC member disenfranchised due to travel, overbooking, etc. We're all busy. In addition,, according to Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert%27s_Rules_of_Order), the "requirement for a quorum is protection against totally unrepresentative action in the name of the body by an unduly small number of persons." Finally, we aren't really making as much progress as I would like (you'll see an update from Phil on this) and as such using "quorum authority" helps us execute.
All of that said, let's continue to discuss/explore how we can be more flexible and accommodating of people's time/commitments.