1. TSC@lists.opendaylight.org
  2. Messages
   Date   
Phosphorus SR1 TSC approval

Daniel de la Rosa
 

Hello TSC and all

Please proceed to approve Phosphorus SR1

Only TSC members can vote


Thanks

--
Daniel de la Rosa
ODL Release Manager
Re: ODL Twitter Account Status

Robert Varga
 

On 15/11/2021 11:05, Robert Varga wrote:
On 26/10/2021 00:37, Brandon Wick wrote:
Hi All,
Hello Brandon,
Hello Brandon, Jill,

Here's the status on the ODL Twitter account.

#################

Unfortunately, due to some staffing changes in the past we are unable to access the ODL Twitter account. (The recovery email associated with the account is not a Linux Foundation email address).

We have made multiple formal requests via Twitter Help Center to recover this data and have, so far, been unsuccessful. We just made another formal request last week and will explore other recovery options if this time is again unsuccessful.
Do we have an update on this?

Thanks,
Robert

?
OpenPGP_signature

Re: [E] Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Sangwook Ha
 

Hi Daniel,

The failure of openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-bulkomatic-only-phosphorus for integration-distribution-test-phosphorus #230 is because of BindException (testing was aborted), but there would be a few failing test cases even if it was completed normally. And I believe all three failing Jenkins jobs (2 OpenFlow Plugin & 1 OVSDB) are affected by the same clustering issue, which won't be fixed for this release.

Thanks,
Sangwook


On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 7:19 AM Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...> wrote:
Thanks Luis

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:22 PM Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote:
OK, int/test changes are merged now.

On Nov 23, 2021, at 3:36 PM, Ha, Sangwook <sangwook.ha@...> wrote:

3 integration/test patches for OpenFlow Plugin are ready for review (submitted one more to address an EOS test case):


Luis, please take a look at the changes.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:08 PM Sangwook Ha via lists.opendaylight.org <sangwook.ha=verizon.com@...> wrote:
In addition to the integration/test change 98642, we need some additional changes for OpenFlow Plugin tests to support the stricter URL requirements & status code change (204 for RPC with empty response):


I'm running some test jobs in the sandbox now, and should be ready for review.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 22/11/2021 23:11, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>
>
> it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/
> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/>

Okay, so BGPCEP should be all clear, the RESTCONF regression blocking
OFP perf tests is resolved.

One of the OVSDB failures has a controller tracker, but we won't be able
to fix it for SR1.

Th eonly outstanding item I am currently tracking is this:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98642

Luis, can you review it, please?

So this is what we are getting after all these fixes...


two OFP tests are still failing.. are we ok with picking RC with these two issues? @Robert Varga @Luis Gomez @Ha, Sangwook ?


 

Thanks,
Robert
Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Gerrit update at 4:00pm PST today.

Jessica Wagantall <jwagantall@...>
 

Hi Team!..

Merging this change seems to have caused an issue bringing the service back. 

I have for now reverted it and will debug it further before attempting to merge again. 
Will let you know next time is ready!

Thanks a ton for your patience!
Jess
Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Gerrit update at 4:00pm PST today.

Jessica Wagantall <jwagantall@...>
 

Hi Team!.. 

Small reminder.. this is about to start

Thanks!
Jess

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:11 PM Jessica Wagantall <jwagantall@...> wrote:
Dear community, 

We have a small change in ODL Gerrit ready to be merged at 4:00pm PST today.

This change will allow links to jira.linuxfoundation.org to be properly directed when
using "LF-Jira" in your commit messages:

We do not expect any service downtime and we expect this to be fairly quick,
however you might notice a small glitch during this time. 
Please know that this will be under control.

Thanks so much!
Jess
[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Gerrit update at 4:00pm PST today.

Jessica Wagantall <jwagantall@...>
 

Dear community, 

We have a small change in ODL Gerrit ready to be merged at 4:00pm PST today.

This change will allow links to jira.linuxfoundation.org to be properly directed when
using "LF-Jira" in your commit messages:

We do not expect any service downtime and we expect this to be fairly quick,
however you might notice a small glitch during this time. 
Please know that this will be under control.

Thanks so much!
Jess
Re: [E] Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Daniel de la Rosa
 

Thanks Luis

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:22 PM Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote:
OK, int/test changes are merged now.

On Nov 23, 2021, at 3:36 PM, Ha, Sangwook <sangwook.ha@...> wrote:

3 integration/test patches for OpenFlow Plugin are ready for review (submitted one more to address an EOS test case):


Luis, please take a look at the changes.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:08 PM Sangwook Ha via lists.opendaylight.org <sangwook.ha=verizon.com@...> wrote:
In addition to the integration/test change 98642, we need some additional changes for OpenFlow Plugin tests to support the stricter URL requirements & status code change (204 for RPC with empty response):


I'm running some test jobs in the sandbox now, and should be ready for review.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 22/11/2021 23:11, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>
>
> it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/
> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/>

Okay, so BGPCEP should be all clear, the RESTCONF regression blocking
OFP perf tests is resolved.

One of the OVSDB failures has a controller tracker, but we won't be able
to fix it for SR1.

Th eonly outstanding item I am currently tracking is this:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98642

Luis, can you review it, please?

So this is what we are getting after all these fixes...


two OFP tests are still failing.. are we ok with picking RC with these two issues? @Robert Varga @Luis Gomez @Ha, Sangwook ?


 

Thanks,
Robert
Jenkins jobs: maven-3.8 as default

Robert Varga
 

Hello TSC members,

during infrastructure-side preparation for odlparent-10's requirement of maven-3.8+ in Sulfur, we have discovered an issue with our current JJB setup.

It essentially means that attempts to override job group definitions' use of maven-3.5 are fruitless.

After sparing a bit with Anil on Slack, we have concluded that the cleanest solution is to:
- set our default to mvn38
- remove all current overrides of this default

This would result in all our jobs using maven-3.8, including Silicon and Phosphorus.

This change is purely in our build infrastructure and nothing changes in terms of the ability to build Silicon/Phosphorus projects with maven-3.5+.

In terms of compatibility, I have been using maven-3.8.2+ for all local builds for a couple of months now and experienced no issues at all.

There is another angle to this, which is that maven-3.8.1 is a security, as detailed here:
https://maven.apache.org/docs/3.8.1/release-notes.html#cve-2020-13956
https://maven.apache.org/docs/3.8.1/release-notes.html#cve-2021-26291

Hence we would like to merge https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/98646 and follow that up with a cleanup of superfluous mvn-version directives.

Are there any objections to this plan of action?

Thanks,
Robert

?
OpenPGP_signature

Re: [E] Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Luis Gomez
 

BTW, even when this is a bug fix, the moment it changes the REST API in a non backwards compatible way, I think it needs some talk. As a minimum whether this change is reasonable for a Service Release and the impact in our ODL partners.

BR/Luis


On Nov 23, 2021, at 4:22 PM, Luis Gomez via lists.opendaylight.org <ecelgp=gmail.com@...> wrote:

OK, int/test changes are merged now.

On Nov 23, 2021, at 3:36 PM, Ha, Sangwook <sangwook.ha@...> wrote:

3 integration/test patches for OpenFlow Plugin are ready for review (submitted one more to address an EOS test case):


Luis, please take a look at the changes.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:08 PM Sangwook Ha via lists.opendaylight.org <sangwook.ha=verizon.com@...> wrote:
In addition to the integration/test change 98642, we need some additional changes for OpenFlow Plugin tests to support the stricter URL requirements & status code change (204 for RPC with empty response):


I'm running some test jobs in the sandbox now, and should be ready for review.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 22/11/2021 23:11, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>
>
> it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/
> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/>

Okay, so BGPCEP should be all clear, the RESTCONF regression blocking
OFP perf tests is resolved.

One of the OVSDB failures has a controller tracker, but we won't be able
to fix it for SR1.

Th eonly outstanding item I am currently tracking is this:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98642

Luis, can you review it, please?

Thanks,
Robert
Re: [E] Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Luis Gomez
 

OK, int/test changes are merged now.

On Nov 23, 2021, at 3:36 PM, Ha, Sangwook <sangwook.ha@...> wrote:

3 integration/test patches for OpenFlow Plugin are ready for review (submitted one more to address an EOS test case):


Luis, please take a look at the changes.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:08 PM Sangwook Ha via lists.opendaylight.org <sangwook.ha=verizon.com@...> wrote:
In addition to the integration/test change 98642, we need some additional changes for OpenFlow Plugin tests to support the stricter URL requirements & status code change (204 for RPC with empty response):


I'm running some test jobs in the sandbox now, and should be ready for review.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 22/11/2021 23:11, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>
>
> it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/
> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/>

Okay, so BGPCEP should be all clear, the RESTCONF regression blocking
OFP perf tests is resolved.

One of the OVSDB failures has a controller tracker, but we won't be able
to fix it for SR1.

Th eonly outstanding item I am currently tracking is this:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98642

Luis, can you review it, please?

Thanks,
Robert
Re: [E] Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Sangwook Ha
 

3 integration/test patches for OpenFlow Plugin are ready for review (submitted one more to address an EOS test case):


Luis, please take a look at the changes.

Thanks,
Sangwook


On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:08 PM Sangwook Ha via lists.opendaylight.org <sangwook.ha=verizon.com@...> wrote:
In addition to the integration/test change 98642, we need some additional changes for OpenFlow Plugin tests to support the stricter URL requirements & status code change (204 for RPC with empty response):


I'm running some test jobs in the sandbox now, and should be ready for review.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 22/11/2021 23:11, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>
>
> it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/
> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/>

Okay, so BGPCEP should be all clear, the RESTCONF regression blocking
OFP perf tests is resolved.

One of the OVSDB failures has a controller tracker, but we won't be able
to fix it for SR1.

Th eonly outstanding item I am currently tracking is this:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98642

Luis, can you review it, please?

Thanks,
Robert
Re: [E] Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Sangwook Ha
 

In addition to the integration/test change 98642, we need some additional changes for OpenFlow Plugin tests to support the stricter URL requirements & status code change (204 for RPC with empty response):


I'm running some test jobs in the sandbox now, and should be ready for review.

Thanks,
Sangwook

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 22/11/2021 23:11, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>
>
> it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/
> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/>

Okay, so BGPCEP should be all clear, the RESTCONF regression blocking
OFP perf tests is resolved.

One of the OVSDB failures has a controller tracker, but we won't be able
to fix it for SR1.

Th eonly outstanding item I am currently tracking is this:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98642

Luis, can you review it, please?

Thanks,
Robert
Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Robert Varga
 

On 22/11/2021 23:11, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/>
Okay, so BGPCEP should be all clear, the RESTCONF regression blocking OFP perf tests is resolved.

One of the OVSDB failures has a controller tracker, but we won't be able to fix it for SR1.

Th eonly outstanding item I am currently tracking is this: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98642

Luis, can you review it, please?

Thanks,
Robert

?
OpenPGP_signature

Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Robert Varga
 

On 22/11/2021 23:11, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/>
On the OFP side, we have a RESTCONF regression: https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETCONF-834

I have the fix and will be rolling it out as soon as possible.

Regards,
Robert

?
OpenPGP_signature

Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Robert Varga
 

On 22/11/2021 23:11, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/228/>
On the BGPCEP side, this seems to be a problem with in RFC8040 request URI format:

http://10.30.170.109:8181/rests/data/odl-data-change-counter-config:data-change-counter-config/data-change-counter


results it:

<errors xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-restconf">
<error>
<error-tag>missing-attribute</error-tag>
<error-message>Entry '(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bgpcep:data-change-counter-config?revision=2017-04-24)data-change-counter-config' requires key or value predicate to be present.
</error-message>
<error-type>protocol</error-type>
</error>
</errors>

I think that should read

http://10.30.170.109:8181/rests/data/odl-data-change-counter-config:data-change-counter-config=data-change-counter

instead, but let me get back to you.

Regards,
Robert

?
OpenPGP_signature

Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Daniel de la Rosa
 



On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 3:06 PM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 15/11/2021 20:22, Robert Varga wrote:
> On 15/11/2021 17:54, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:36 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>
> The bgpcep regression (https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988)
> is tricky, as it seems we turned around a rock under which it was hiding
> for couple of years.
>
> Nevertheless I think we have a pretty good idea as to what is going on
> and should be able to clear that in the next few days.
>
> Anyway, I am rolling out an update to get the things we have now into
> wider testing.

Alright, so BGPCEP-988 is confirmed passing in a Sulfur, thanks to Marek
and Olivier for tracking it down and fixing it.

With bgpcep-0.16.11 we are back to passing completely here:
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/bgpcep-csit-1node-userfeatures-all-sulfur/

The corresponding Phosphorus job's manual runs seem to be mismatching on
distro name somehow, but the next AR should be fine AFAICT.


it seems that there are still BGPCEP, OVSDB and OFP issues




 

Regards,
Robert
Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Robert Varga
 

On 15/11/2021 20:22, Robert Varga wrote:
On 15/11/2021 17:54, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:


On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:36 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
The bgpcep regression (https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988) is tricky, as it seems we turned around a rock under which it was hiding for couple of years.
Nevertheless I think we have a pretty good idea as to what is going on and should be able to clear that in the next few days.
Anyway, I am rolling out an update to get the things we have now into wider testing.
Alright, so BGPCEP-988 is confirmed passing in a Sulfur, thanks to Marek and Olivier for tracking it down and fixing it.

With bgpcep-0.16.11 we are back to passing completely here: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/bgpcep-csit-1node-userfeatures-all-sulfur/

The corresponding Phosphorus job's manual runs seem to be mismatching on distro name somehow, but the next AR should be fine AFAICT.

Regards,
Robert

?
OpenPGP_signature

Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Robert Varga
 

On 19/11/2021 06:27, Richard Kosegi wrote:
Hi,
I removed references to prefix-shard module in daexim's tests https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98613 <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98613>
CSIT seems to pass on sandbox https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/view/All/job/daexim-csit-1node-basic-only-phosphorus/1/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/view/All/job/daexim-csit-1node-basic-only-phosphorus/1/>
Confirmed on Sulfur here: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/daexim-csit-3node-clustering-basic-only-sulfur/

Thanks,
Robert



Regards,
Richard
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 00:57, Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@... <mailto:ddelarosa0707@...>> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:38 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
<mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
On 18/11/2021 19:28, Richard Kosegi wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I don't think this has anything to do with daexim, it can't
import data
> into an operational datastore because the offending module
> (shard-prefix) is not loaded.
> The Module seems to belong to controller IIRC:
>
> Schema node with name prefix-shards was not found under
(urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0)data
Right, but prefix shards have been removed in
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1977
<https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1977>, so
daexim should
not rely on them...
Richard, is this something you can help with ?
Thanks
Regards,
Robert

>
>
> Regards,
> Richard.
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 17:15, Daniel de la Rosa
<ddelarosa0707@... <mailto:ddelarosa0707@...>
> <mailto:ddelarosa0707@...
<mailto:ddelarosa0707@...>>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Robert and all... Richard, we are having some
issues with
>     Daexim, is that something you can help with?
>
>
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/
<https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>
>
 <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>>
>
>     On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:22 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
<mailto:nite@...>
>     <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>>> wrote:
>
>         On 15/11/2021 17:54, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >
>          >
>          > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:36 AM Robert Varga
<nite@... <mailto:nite@...>
>         <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>>
>          > <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>
<mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>>>> wrote:
>          >
>          >     On 10/11/2021 06:54, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >      > Hello TSC and all
>          >      >
>          >      > It looks like we can't pick a phosphorus RC
for SR1
>         from the
>          >     failures we
>          >      > are getting
>          >      >
>          >      >
>          >
>
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/
<https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>
>
 <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>>
>          >
>
 <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>>>
>          >
>          >      >
>          >
>
 <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>>
>          >
>
 <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>>>>
>          >      >
>          >      > Please let me know if there are fixes in
progress for
>         these issues
>          >
>          >     I am currently tracking two issues in
controller and one
>         in bgpcep we
>          >     want to ship in SR1.
>          >
>          >
>          > Thanks Robert. Hopefully the issues can be
resolved this week.
>
>         We are done with the controller things (thanks
Tomas), with
>         actually
>         some unreported bugs being shaken out as well.
>
>         The bgpcep regression
>         (https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988
<https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988>
>         <https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988
<https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988>>)
>         is tricky, as it seems we turned around a rock under
which it
>         was hiding
>         for couple of years.
>
>         Nevertheless I think we have a pretty good idea as to
what is
>         going on
>         and should be able to clear that in the next few days.
>
>         Anyway, I am rolling out an update to get the things
we have now
>         into
>         wider testing.
>
>         Regards,
>         Robert
>
>
--
Daniel de la Rosa
ODL Release Manager

?
OpenPGP_signature

Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Richard Kosegi <richard.kosegi@...>
 

Hi,

I removed references to prefix-shard module in daexim's tests https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/98613

Regards,
Richard



On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 00:57, Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...> wrote:


On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:38 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 18/11/2021 19:28, Richard Kosegi wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I don't think this has anything to do with daexim, it can't import data
> into an operational datastore because the offending module
> (shard-prefix) is not loaded.
> The Module seems to belong to controller IIRC:
>
> Schema node with name prefix-shards was not found under (urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0)data

Right, but prefix shards have been removed in
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1977, so daexim should
not rely on them...

Richard, is this something you can help with ?

Thanks 





Regards,
Robert


>
>
> Regards,
> Richard.
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 17:15, Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...
> <mailto:ddelarosa0707@...>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Robert and all... Richard, we are having some issues with
>     Daexim, is that something you can help with?
>
>     https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/
>     <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>
>
>     On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:22 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>     <mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
>
>         On 15/11/2021 17:54, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >
>          >
>          > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:36 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>         <mailto:nite@...>
>          > <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>>> wrote:
>          >
>          >     On 10/11/2021 06:54, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >      > Hello TSC and all
>          >      >
>          >      > It looks like we can't pick a phosphorus RC for SR1
>         from the
>          >     failures we
>          >      > are getting
>          >      >
>          >      >
>          >
>         https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/
>         <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>
>          >   
>           <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>>
>          >
>          >      >
>          >   
>           <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>
>          >   
>           <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>>>
>          >      >
>          >      > Please let me know if there are fixes in progress for
>         these issues
>          >
>          >     I am currently tracking two issues in controller and one
>         in bgpcep we
>          >     want to ship in SR1.
>          >
>          >
>          > Thanks Robert. Hopefully the issues can be resolved this week.
>
>         We are done with the controller things (thanks Tomas), with
>         actually
>         some unreported bugs being shaken out as well.
>
>         The bgpcep regression
>         (https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988
>         <https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988>)
>         is tricky, as it seems we turned around a rock under which it
>         was hiding
>         for couple of years.
>
>         Nevertheless I think we have a pretty good idea as to what is
>         going on
>         and should be able to clear that in the next few days.
>
>         Anyway, I am rolling out an update to get the things we have now
>         into
>         wider testing.
>
>         Regards,
>         Robert
>
--
Daniel de la Rosa
ODL Release Manager
Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC

Daniel de la Rosa
 



On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:38 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 18/11/2021 19:28, Richard Kosegi wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I don't think this has anything to do with daexim, it can't import data
> into an operational datastore because the offending module
> (shard-prefix) is not loaded.
> The Module seems to belong to controller IIRC:
>
> Schema node with name prefix-shards was not found under (urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0)data

Right, but prefix shards have been removed in
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1977, so daexim should
not rely on them...

Richard, is this something you can help with ?

Thanks 





Regards,
Robert


>
>
> Regards,
> Richard.
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 17:15, Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...
> <mailto:ddelarosa0707@...>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Robert and all... Richard, we are having some issues with
>     Daexim, is that something you can help with?
>
>     https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/
>     <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>
>
>     On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:22 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>     <mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
>
>         On 15/11/2021 17:54, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >
>          >
>          > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:36 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>         <mailto:nite@...>
>          > <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>>> wrote:
>          >
>          >     On 10/11/2021 06:54, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >      > Hello TSC and all
>          >      >
>          >      > It looks like we can't pick a phosphorus RC for SR1
>         from the
>          >     failures we
>          >      > are getting
>          >      >
>          >      >
>          >
>         https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/
>         <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>
>          >   
>           <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>>
>          >
>          >      >
>          >   
>           <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>
>          >   
>           <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/>>>
>          >      >
>          >      > Please let me know if there are fixes in progress for
>         these issues
>          >
>          >     I am currently tracking two issues in controller and one
>         in bgpcep we
>          >     want to ship in SR1.
>          >
>          >
>          > Thanks Robert. Hopefully the issues can be resolved this week.
>
>         We are done with the controller things (thanks Tomas), with
>         actually
>         some unreported bugs being shaken out as well.
>
>         The bgpcep regression
>         (https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988
>         <https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-988>)
>         is tricky, as it seems we turned around a rock under which it
>         was hiding
>         for couple of years.
>
>         Nevertheless I think we have a pretty good idea as to what is
>         going on
>         and should be able to clear that in the next few days.
>
>         Anyway, I am rolling out an update to get the things we have now
>         into
>         wider testing.
>
>         Regards,
>         Robert
>
--
Daniel de la Rosa
ODL Release Manager
201 - 220 of 14184