<rob.sherwood@...> wrote: Actually both your proposal and whether or not what Colin/David are suggesting is the same thing as you have proposed are items for discussion. --dmm

OK -- just so it's said, I consider Colin and Dave's proposal to be simply a more well thought out and detailed version of my proposal that I pitched on

<rob.sherwood@...> wrote: Understand that, was wondering if there were other proposals that were equally details --dmm

Colin and Dave are going to pitch their merged plan in about 40 minutes. I'm still trying to understand the details but it seems to have some strong points. - Rob .

All, Since I have asked the "controller" and "net-virt-platform" teams to look at a resolution proposal, I'm looking for a progress report (if any). Thnx, --dmm

Hello TSC Members: Please indicate below what times work for you for an added weekly TSC meeting. You can put an "X", a "Y", or "Yes".. whatever you prefer under *ALL* of the times that would work

No, not unless you need me to take it. --dmm

First off, Dave, do you have the editing pen now for this? Right, no vote == abstain. You need some default state. It seems the most obvious route is no vote == abstain to

* Thomas Nadeau (tnadeau@...) wrote: Come to think of it, we don't actually have "the development" list. We have "the discuss" list, or "the TSC" list. Capturing the spirit here, it'd be

* David Meyer (dmm@...) wrote: That's boilerplate from the original. OpenStack has a TC (Technical Committee), which is built of PTLs (Project Technical Leads) and 5 community voted

Thanks Tom. A few questions/comments in line. --dmm

I have tried to capture the details of our discussion last week. Please comment on the proposal below so that we can amend the process as soon as possible. --Tom Email-based or Proxy-based

Thanks Chris. --dmm

* Chris Wright (chrisw@...) wrote: FYI, I updated the wiki landing page to include a pointer to the account system. The direct link is

* Aleksandar Miljusevic (miljusevic@...) wrote: It's editable now. You need to log in. Perhaps you simply need an account? thanks, -chris

The lead administrator for the OpenDaylight tools is Andrew Grimberg (cc-ed). In short, I would suggest making this a forward looking policy as opposed to an immediate implementation. I.e. keep the

In discussing this with Phil he pointed out that we need to bring the developer tools admins into this conversation before we make any decisions. Basically we need to know what is possible with our

Hello all, Is editing of the Controller Project's Modules/Bundles and Interfaces Page going to be open to the public at some point? Aleksandar Miljusevic

Fwiw, I'm very supportive of this with the caveat that it may hard to find neutral names for things and we may need to open it up to suggestions. Maybe using some sort of prefix like

Benson, The Project Lifecycle already includes this in the proposal. Clearly a naming problem (for example a trademark or branding or other issue) would preclude acceptance of the proposal until it