|
Re: Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
+1
By
Sam Hague <shague@...>
·
#11107
·
|
|
Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
Hi TSC,
please vote to approve Faseela as a committer in NetVirt. The NetVirt committers have voted to approve the nomination in the vote email [1].
Thanks, Sam
[1]
Hi TSC,
please vote to approve Faseela as a committer in NetVirt. The NetVirt committers have voted to approve the nomination in the vote email [1].
Thanks, Sam
[1]
|
By
Sam Hague <shague@...>
·
#11106
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
I guess we have here a confusion between mdsal binding-parent and mdsal binding.model.
My point was that they use different revisions and that binding.model versions are not documented anywhere, nor
I guess we have here a confusion between mdsal binding-parent and mdsal binding.model.
My point was that they use different revisions and that binding.model versions are not documented anywhere, nor
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#11105
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects check
Update: sorry, the question 2 should be fine (I just saw that project’s stable branch should remain locked, and can still summit gerrit by super committer).
Christine
From:謝宜玲
Update: sorry, the question 2 should be fine (I just saw that project’s stable branch should remain locked, and can still summit gerrit by super committer).
Christine
From:謝宜玲
|
By
ylhsieh@...
·
#11104
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects check
Hi,
As the doc [1] indicates self-managed project to add to the distribution sanity test [4], but I can’t push to releng/builder repo, is the repo locked? Besides, snmp4sdn repo’s stable/neon
Hi,
As the doc [1] indicates self-managed project to add to the distribution sanity test [4], but I can’t push to releng/builder repo, is the repo locked? Besides, snmp4sdn repo’s stable/neon
|
By
ylhsieh@...
·
#11103
·
|
|
Re: ODL DDF
Please put up your topics here:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Sodium_Dev_Forum
I have also linked the above URL from https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events.
Please put up your topics here:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Sodium_Dev_Forum
I have also linked the above URL from https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#11102
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
Hi Guillome,
If you see the link: https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/integration-distribution/en/latest/platform-versions.html, you will see mdsal version for Neon is 3.0.6.
Hi Guillome,
If you see the link: https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/integration-distribution/en/latest/platform-versions.html, you will see mdsal version for Neon is 3.0.6.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11101
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
I believe Luis sent this info in a prior email (I can't find it - I probably deleted it).
I believe Luis sent this info in a prior email (I can't find it - I probably deleted it).
|
By
Tom Pantelis <tompantelis@...>
·
#11100
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
Thanks for the answer.
If so, on which non-SNAPSHOT versions am I supposed to depend on ? Is 1.2.6 okay ?
Cf previous thread at
Thanks for the answer.
If so, on which non-SNAPSHOT versions am I supposed to depend on ? Is 1.2.6 okay ?
Cf previous thread at
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#11099
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
The mdsal ;project is release integrated (or whatever the official term is) so you're not supposed to depend on snapshot versions.
The mdsal ;project is release integrated (or whatever the official term is) so you're not supposed to depend on snapshot versions.
|
By
Tom Pantelis <tompantelis@...>
·
#11098
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
Hi all
Luis, I created a TransportPCE stable/neon branch yesterday with a config that was working last week..
But I got a Jenkins build failure because of obsolete poms. It appears that Mdsal binding
Hi all
Luis, I created a TransportPCE stable/neon branch yesterday with a config that was working last week..
But I got a Jenkins build failure because of obsolete poms. It appears that Mdsal binding
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#11097
·
|
|
Re: ODL DDF
Yes - DDF is planned for April 1st and 2nd. Casey or I will setup a page for it.
Yes - DDF is planned for April 1st and 2nd. Casey or I will setup a page for it.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#11096
·
|
|
ODL DDF
Casey/Abhijit,
Could you please confirm if ODL DDF is planned for April 1st and 2nd?
We have to plan our travel accordingly, as some of us have to attend ONS as well.
Will need an
Casey/Abhijit,
Could you please confirm if ODL DDF is planned for April 1st and 2nd?
We have to plan our travel accordingly, as some of us have to attend ONS as well.
Will need an
|
By
Faseela K
·
#11095
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
SM projects are free to join any release as long as they provide a release artifact in the week after the managed projects release (~2 weeks from now).
Current status of SM projects that we are aware
SM projects are free to join any release as long as they provide a release artifact in the week after the managed projects release (~2 weeks from now).
Current status of SM projects that we are aware
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11094
·
|
|
Venkatrangan Govindarajan for releng/builder committer - approved
+1
With my vote that makes it 7 out of 13 - and the vote carries. Venkat - please work with HelpDesk to get your committer rights assigned. Thanh - please update project committer list on the project
+1
With my vote that makes it 7 out of 13 - and the vote carries. Venkat - please work with HelpDesk to get your committer rights assigned. Thanh - please update project committer list on the project
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#11093
·
|
|
Re: Venkatrangan Govindarajan for releng/builder committer
Thanh Ha <thanh.ha@...> wrote:
+1
Regards,
Stephen
Thanh Ha <thanh.ha@...> wrote:
+1
Regards,
Stephen
|
By
Stephen Kitt <skitt@...>
·
#11092
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
Hi,
Hope it’s not too late to respond. SNMP4SDN would like to be part of Neon, and already have the stable/neon branch. Current status: our code freezes, and recently we are fixing the build
Hi,
Hope it’s not too late to respond. SNMP4SDN would like to be part of Neon, and already have the stable/neon branch. Current status: our code freezes, and recently we are fixing the build
|
By
ylhsieh@...
·
#11091
·
|
|
Re: Faseela K as Integration/Test Committer
+1
With my vote that makes it 7 out of 13 and the vote carries. Congrats Faseela. Please work with the Helpdesk by sending them an email to get your committer rights assigned. Also Luis - please
+1
With my vote that makes it 7 out of 13 and the vote carries. Congrats Faseela. Please work with the Helpdesk by sending them an email to get your committer rights assigned. Also Luis - please
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#11090
·
|
|
Re: Faseela K as Integration/Test Committer
+1
By
Anil Belur
·
#11089
·
|
|
Re: Karthika Paneer as Integration/Test Committer
+1
By
Anil Belur
·
#11088
·
|