|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Hi, everyone.
I would like to share what information we have at this time. Plastic 2.1.6 was able to release on Jan 29th. After that time, the staging repository has seemed to be reporting at least
Hi, everyone.
I would like to share what information we have at this time. Plastic 2.1.6 was able to release on Jan 29th. After that time, the staging repository has seemed to be reporting at least
|
By
Casey Cain
·
#12537
·
|
|
ODL Guice
Hi all,
I have updated the project proposal for Guice on Friday and incorporated Robert's review comments too - https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/ODL/ODL+Guice+Project
Please feel free to add more
Hi all,
I have updated the project proposal for Guice on Friday and incorporated Robert's review comments too - https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/ODL/ODL+Guice+Project
Please feel free to add more
|
By
Tejas Nevrekar
·
#12536
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
FYI, I have found this in the ODL charter [1], it is about License violations rather than security vulnerabilities (I believe Nexus IQ detects both):
Paragraph c and d in section 7. Intellectual
FYI, I have found this in the ODL charter [1], it is about License violations rather than security vulnerabilities (I believe Nexus IQ detects both):
Paragraph c and d in section 7. Intellectual
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#12535
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
I think there is a mismatch between this and what Casey communicated last Thursday, I wish you were there. My understanding of ODL project governance is exactly what you described in your email,
I think there is a mismatch between this and what Casey communicated last Thursday, I wish you were there. My understanding of ODL project governance is exactly what you described in your email,
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#12534
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
I am sorry, but I just cannot agree with this point.
Each normal[0] OpenDaylight project is created sovereign.
That means that each project is completely and ultimately responsible
for defining and
I am sorry, but I just cannot agree with this point.
Each normal[0] OpenDaylight project is created sovereign.
That means that each project is completely and ultimately responsible
for defining and
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#12533
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Hi, everyone.
Some of our IT/RE management team are out of the office today so we have not yet completed a proper investigation. Please give us until end of day Monday to respond.
Sorry for the
Hi, everyone.
Some of our IT/RE management team are out of the office today so we have not yet completed a proper investigation. Please give us until end of day Monday to respond.
Sorry for the
|
By
Casey Cain
·
#12532
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Well, that is what LF is investigating now per my understanding but this should not block Allan to use the security team avenue.
BR/Luis
Well, that is what LF is investigating now per my understanding but this should not block Allan to use the security team avenue.
BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#12531
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
thanks Luis, Abhijit.
Anil, Casey, still wondering about the v2.1.6 vs v2.1.7 weirdness that keeps getting
unanswered.
JamO
On 3/6/20 3:18 PM, Abhijit
thanks Luis, Abhijit.
Anil, Casey, still wondering about the v2.1.6 vs v2.1.7 weirdness that keeps getting
unanswered.
JamO
On 3/6/20 3:18 PM, Abhijit
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#12530
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Also:
Casey Cain to work with LF IT to address communications to the community regarding security issues. 06 Mar 2020
Casey Cain to follow up with Allan Clarke Thanh Ha and the community on Plastic
Also:
Casey Cain to work with LF IT to address communications to the community regarding security issues. 06 Mar 2020
Casey Cain to follow up with Allan Clarke Thanh Ha and the community on Plastic
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#12529
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Hi Jamo,
Few outcomes from yesterday TSC call (at least for me):
1) Thanh will open a ticket to LF to work on a new feature to notify users upfront if there is a security problem in the staging
Hi Jamo,
Few outcomes from yesterday TSC call (at least for me):
1) Thanh will open a ticket to LF to work on a new feature to notify users upfront if there is a security problem in the staging
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#12528
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
I missed the TSC meeting last night. Can someone recap over email what came of
this? I see one note in the minutes that Casey indicated that no change has
occurred in the policy
I missed the TSC meeting last night. Can someone recap over email what came of
this? I see one note in the minutes that Casey indicated that no change has
occurred in the policy
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#12527
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
The concerning thing here for me is LF deployed a new release process requiring someone or group of people to analyse and provide a security waiver to projects before allowing the project to be
The concerning thing here for me is LF deployed a new release process requiring someone or group of people to analyse and provide a security waiver to projects before allowing the project to be
|
By
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...>
·
#12526
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Thanks for the reply, Anil. That did answer some questions I had.
My questions:
Why is there no link or docs connecting a built-but-not-available staging build to a vulnerability report?
Why are
Thanks for the reply, Anil. That did answer some questions I had.
My questions:
Why is there no link or docs connecting a built-but-not-available staging build to a vulnerability report?
Why are
|
By
Allan
·
#12525
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Greetings Allan:
I understand the concerns on the delay in releasing Plastic, please find my response below.
1. The policy violations are security issues outside the scope of LF/RE's to determine if
Greetings Allan:
I understand the concerns on the delay in releasing Plastic, please find my response below.
1. The policy violations are security issues outside the scope of LF/RE's to determine if
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#12524
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Yes - let us discuss it tonight at the TSC meeting.
Yes - let us discuss it tonight at the TSC meeting.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#12523
·
|
|
Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Abhijit, can we bring this topic in tonight’s TSC?
BR/Luis
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Allan" <aclarke@...>
Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL
Abhijit, can we bring this topic in tonight’s TSC?
BR/Luis
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Allan" <aclarke@...>
Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#12522
·
|
|
Issue with Linux Foundation and expectations on ODL projects
Greetings!
I have been trying to get a new release of the Plastic sub-project out for 3 weeks now and have been clogged up in LF helpdesk.
*Summary*
LF is not allowing newer release of
Greetings!
I have been trying to get a new release of the Plastic sub-project out for 3 weeks now and have been clogged up in LF helpdesk.
*Summary*
LF is not allowing newer release of
|
By
Allan
·
#12521
·
|
|
TSC Meeting for March 5, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific - Agenda
Next TSC meeting is March 5, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/657152618.
Agenda for this meeting is
Next TSC meeting is March 5, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/657152618.
Agenda for this meeting is
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#12520
·
|
|
Re: Daniel De La Rosa to proxy for me in TSC APAC Meeting (3/5/2020)
Thanks for letting us know.
Thanks for letting us know.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#12519
·
|
|
Daniel De La Rosa to proxy for me in TSC APAC Meeting (3/5/2020)
Thanks,
JamO
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#12518
·
|