|
Re: Widening reach for ... code?
So far so good.
Okay, so this is where LF(N) or ODL budgeting gets involved. The plugin
needs to be improved to mirror any comments back to the PR. IIRC at
least GH has APIs to do this.
Same as
So far so good.
Okay, so this is where LF(N) or ODL budgeting gets involved. The plugin
needs to be improved to mirror any comments back to the PR. IIRC at
least GH has APIs to do this.
Same as
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13051
·
|
|
Re: Widening reach for ... code?
On the ODL side of things, moving the regular build jobs will be the "easy" part as it's migrating some maven shell scripts to the new CI system. CSIT on the other hand would be the difficult part. I
On the ODL side of things, moving the regular build jobs will be the "easy" part as it's migrating some maven shell scripts to the new CI system. CSIT on the other hand would be the difficult part. I
|
By
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...>
·
#13050
·
|
|
Re: Widening reach for ... code?
Right-o. We are in a completely different position: we have *hundreds*
if not *thousands* of jobs to migrate. Granted, majority of those are
duds, but my guesstimate is we are looking at ~200 jobs
Right-o. We are in a completely different position: we have *hundreds*
if not *thousands* of jobs to migrate. Granted, majority of those are
duds, but my guesstimate is we are looking at ~200 jobs
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13049
·
|
|
Re: Widening reach for ... code?
We are doing some leg work on this. We've been getting semi-deep in the
weeds the following of late:
GitHub + Azure Pipelines
GitHub + Jenkins (we already support several projects in this
We are doing some leg work on this. We've been getting semi-deep in the
weeds the following of late:
GitHub + Azure Pipelines
GitHub + Jenkins (we already support several projects in this
|
By
Andrew Grimberg
·
#13048
·
|
|
Re: Widening reach for ... code?
I can weigh in a little bit on this. I'm not going to go in depth here,
but I can definitely answer a few of the questions raised.
I migration to GitLab would basically mean throwing the Jenkins
I can weigh in a little bit on this. I'm not going to go in depth here,
but I can definitely answer a few of the questions raised.
I migration to GitLab would basically mean throwing the Jenkins
|
By
Andrew Grimberg
·
#13047
·
|
|
Re: Widening reach for ... code?
See inline.
(Include's Robert's fixes)
Either way would require modifying JJB to support the new SCM system GitLab and the trigger mechanism would be quite a bit different than what we have with
See inline.
(Include's Robert's fixes)
Either way would require modifying JJB to support the new SCM system GitLab and the trigger mechanism would be quite a bit different than what we have with
|
By
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...>
·
#13046
·
|
|
Re: Widening reach for ... code?
Sorry, thinko fixes:
s/contributors/contributions/
s/ODL mirror/ODL project/
Regards,
Robert
Sorry, thinko fixes:
s/contributors/contributions/
s/ODL mirror/ODL project/
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13045
·
|
|
Widening reach for ... code?
Hello,
in today's (lightly advertised) TWS call, Casey raised the question of
migrating our infrastructure to GitLab in a bid to attract more
contributions.
Unfortunately a straight-up migration
Hello,
in today's (lightly advertised) TWS call, Casey raised the question of
migrating our infrastructure to GitLab in a bid to attract more
contributions.
Unfortunately a straight-up migration
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13044
·
|
|
Re: GENIUS-289: migration of ManagedNewTransactionRunner
Awesome work :)
Thanks,
Robert
Awesome work :)
Thanks,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13043
·
|
|
Re: TSC Meeting for August 20, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific - Agenda
Is there a recording of this (and the previous) meeting? I cannot find
it in http://r.lfnetworking.org/?prefix=lfn-zoom/OpenDaylight/TSC/
Thanks,
Robert
Is there a recording of this (and the previous) meeting? I cannot find
it in http://r.lfnetworking.org/?prefix=lfn-zoom/OpenDaylight/TSC/
Thanks,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13042
·
|
|
[release][OpenDaylight TSC] OpenDaylight Sodium SR4 Status
Hello All,
OpenDaylight Sodium SR4 version bump is complete while the staging repository is still being promoted. Note: 'stable/sodium' branch is locked.
Pending activities for the release:
1. Release
Hello All,
OpenDaylight Sodium SR4 version bump is complete while the staging repository is still being promoted. Note: 'stable/sodium' branch is locked.
Pending activities for the release:
1. Release
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13041
·
|
|
Luis to proxy for Tejas at TSC today<EOM>
--
Tejas. S. Nevrekar
Mobile: +91-99805 31339
Bangalore, INDIA.
--
Tejas. S. Nevrekar
Mobile: +91-99805 31339
Bangalore, INDIA.
|
By
Tejas Nevrekar
·
#13040
·
|
|
Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Sodium code freeze
Thanks JamO. I have adjusted the SR4 checklist
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/display/ODL/Sodium+SR4+Release+Checklist
So the TSC vote is
Thanks JamO. I have adjusted the SR4 checklist
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/display/ODL/Sodium+SR4+Release+Checklist
So the TSC vote is
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13039
·
|
|
Re: Sodium code freeze
All of the CSIT results have been marked OKAY or IGNORE. I think we can
move forward with the SR4 release now.
The three jobs that I had marked as blocker (2 netconf and 1
All of the CSIT results have been marked OKAY or IGNORE. I think we can
move forward with the SR4 release now.
The three jobs that I had marked as blocker (2 netconf and 1
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13038
·
|
|
Re: Daniel de la Rosa to proxy for me in today's TSC (8/20/2020)
Sure. Thanks for letting us know.
Sure. Thanks for letting us know.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13037
·
|
|
Daniel de la Rosa to proxy for me in today's TSC (8/20/2020)
Thanks,
JamO
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13036
·
|
|
TSC Meeting for August 20, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific - Agenda
Next TSC meeting is August 20, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/657152618.
Agenda for this meeting is at:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/aBEF
If you
Next TSC meeting is August 20, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/657152618.
Agenda for this meeting is at:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/aBEF
If you
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13035
·
|
|
Re: ODL Silicon release version name is not available in JIRA - Reg
Hi Daniel/Jamo,
I am able to create the "Silicon" fix version. Thanks for your guidelines.
Thanks & Regards,
Karthikeyan.
Hi Daniel/Jamo,
I am able to create the "Silicon" fix version. Thanks for your guidelines.
Thanks & Regards,
Karthikeyan.
|
By
Karthikeyan
·
#13034
·
|
|
Re: ODL Silicon release version name is not available in JIRA - Reg
Indeed, all PTL can manage their own projects including releases.. @Karthikeyan let us know if you dont have access to release management for your proyect--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support
Indeed, all PTL can manage their own projects including releases.. @Karthikeyan let us know if you dont have access to release management for your proyect--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13033
·
|
|
Re: ODL Silicon release version name is not available in JIRA - Reg
Karthikeyan,
I think all project admins can do this. Try going here:
Karthikeyan,
I think all project admins can do this. Try going here:
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13032
·
|