|
NetConf WG status
In the meeting on Oct. 26, I will give a status update on where the NetConf WG is in IETF.
We will look at the current state of drafts that are WG items, some of the more recent ones that have been
In the meeting on Oct. 26, I will give a status update on where the NetConf WG is in IETF.
We will look at the current state of drafts that are WG items, some of the more recent ones that have been
|
By
Mahesh Jethanandani <jethanandanm@...>
·
#13208
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] [release] Silicon Release plans
I have created project plans for ODL-Guice and ODL-Micro here:
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-294
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-295
Regards,
-Tejas
I have created project plans for ODL-Guice and ODL-Micro here:
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-294
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-295
Regards,
-Tejas
|
By
Tejas Nevrekar
·
#13207
·
|
|
Re: ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
Hello Achuth,
So in lispflowmapping only the model artifact is being used and only by
mappingservice.neutron.
I am not sure what that component does. Neutron already hosts two
hostconfig
Hello Achuth,
So in lispflowmapping only the model artifact is being used and only by
mappingservice.neutron.
I am not sure what that component does. Neutron already hosts two
hostconfig
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13206
·
|
|
Re: [release] OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
Robert,
For SRM : https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/genius/en/stable-aluminium/specs/service-recovery.html
Sorry, this was never moved to ServiceUtils.
Thanks,--
Faseela.K
Cisco,
Robert,
For SRM : https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/genius/en/stable-aluminium/specs/service-recovery.html
Sorry, this was never moved to ServiceUtils.
Thanks,--
Faseela.K
Cisco,
|
By
Faseela K <k.faseela@...>
·
#13205
·
|
|
Intend to make Openflow Plugin Project as self managed project
Hi All,
As discussed in the last TSC meeting ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF), we intend to make Openflow Plugin project to be “self managed” from Silicon release onwards.
If
Hi All,
As discussed in the last TSC meeting ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF), we intend to make Openflow Plugin project to be “self managed” from Silicon release onwards.
If
|
By
d.arunprakash@...
·
#13204
·
|
|
Re: [release] OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
Hello Chetan,
We might be interested in OVSDB, but unfortunately it depends on
ServiceUtils.
Now there is no thread for ServiceUtils and while the project seems to
be small, there I cannot seem to
Hello Chetan,
We might be interested in OVSDB, but unfortunately it depends on
ServiceUtils.
Now there is no thread for ServiceUtils and while the project seems to
be small, there I cannot seem to
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13203
·
|
|
Re: [release] Silicon Release plans
Hello Daniel,
infrautils is an MRI project now. As I noted in a separate email, it is
ready for integration with release notes
Hello Daniel,
infrautils is an MRI project now. As I noted in a separate email, it is
ready for integration with release notes
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13202
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] [release] ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
As for resources and keeping things uptodate, if memory serves right,
only managed projects can really be expected to get contributions, from
fellow managed projects' committers.
Now that's the
As for resources and keeping things uptodate, if memory serves right,
only managed projects can really be expected to get contributions, from
fellow managed projects' committers.
Now that's the
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13201
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] [release] ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
The way things work in ODL, it is not possible to have a Managed project depending on an SM project.
So if lispflowmapping project wants to continue as Managed project, it should either:
- Remove
The way things work in ODL, it is not possible to have a Managed project depending on an SM project.
So if lispflowmapping project wants to continue as Managed project, it should either:
- Remove
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13200
·
|
|
Re: [release] ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:55 AM Achuth via lists.opendaylight.org <achuth.m=altencalsoftlabs.com@...> wrote:
[...]
Lori &Robert , I believe we have some dependency for certain ODL projects like
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:55 AM Achuth via lists.opendaylight.org <achuth.m=altencalsoftlabs.com@...> wrote:
[...]
Lori &Robert , I believe we have some dependency for certain ODL projects like
|
By
Lori Jakab
·
#13199
·
|
|
ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
Hi All,
We don’t see any new requirements/features for Neutron Northbound project in Silicon release and beyond, hence would
recommend moving this project to a self-managed one going
Hi All,
We don’t see any new requirements/features for Neutron Northbound project in Silicon release and beyond, hence would
recommend moving this project to a self-managed one going
|
By
Achuth <achuth.m@...>
·
#13198
·
|
|
Intend to make Genius Project as self managed project
Hi All,
As discussed in the last TSC meeting ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF), we intend to make GENIUS project to be “self managed” from Silicon release onwards.
If anyone in
Hi All,
As discussed in the last TSC meeting ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF), we intend to make GENIUS project to be “self managed” from Silicon release onwards.
If anyone in
|
By
Hema Gopalakrishnan
·
#13197
·
|
|
NETVIRT: Project moving to Self-Managed for Silicon Release onwards
Hi All,
As per the discussion in the TSC meeting[0] on 01-Oct-2020, we are expressing our intent to move the NETVIRTproject to be "self-managed" for the Silicon release cycle and upcoming release
Hi All,
As per the discussion in the TSC meeting[0] on 01-Oct-2020, we are expressing our intent to move the NETVIRTproject to be "self-managed" for the Silicon release cycle and upcoming release
|
By
Karthikeyan
·
#13196
·
|
|
OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
Hi All,
As per discussion in TSC meeting on 01-Oct-2020, we are expressing our intent to move OVSDB project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF
Hi All,
As per discussion in TSC meeting on 01-Oct-2020, we are expressing our intent to move OVSDB project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF
|
By
Chetan
·
#13195
·
|
|
Technical debt report for September 2020
Hello everyone,
this is a quick summary of current outstanding technical debt, as
reported by the autorelease build.
2.10.2020 3.9.2020 delta
Deprecated 2333 2303 +30
Deprecated for
Hello everyone,
this is a quick summary of current outstanding technical debt, as
reported by the autorelease build.
2.10.2020 3.9.2020 delta
Deprecated 2333 2303 +30
Deprecated for
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13194
·
|
|
Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Archive inactive repositories
We are not building the packages since Sodium SR2, which was brought up in the previous Integration/TSC meeting since no one is consuming these packages upstream.
Therefore, it may be ideal to archive
We are not building the packages since Sodium SR2, which was brought up in the previous Integration/TSC meeting since no one is consuming these packages upstream.
Therefore, it may be ideal to archive
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13193
·
|
|
Rangan to proxy for tejas today<eom>
By
Tejas Nevrekar
·
#13192
·
|
|
TSC Meeting for October 1, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific - Agenda
Next TSC meeting is October 1, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/657152618?pwd=cU9MR3daMkU5dnhaektTMkxXWEErUT09.
Agenda for this meeting is
Next TSC meeting is October 1, 2020 at 10 pm Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/657152618?pwd=cU9MR3daMkU5dnhaektTMkxXWEErUT09.
Agenda for this meeting is
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13191
·
|
|
Re: [release] Aluminium Release Notes
We can turn it off completely but then we'll never know when a link is broken. Part of the reason this job occasionally breaks though is because it's checking so many links in the docs and the
We can turn it off completely but then we'll never know when a link is broken. Part of the reason this job occasionally breaks though is because it's checking so many links in the docs and the
|
By
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...>
·
#13190
·
|
|
Re: [release] Aluminium Release Notes
Thanh, Anil, couple of things:
- I see lot of issues with the docs linkcheck (multiple rechecks required to pass a build), would it be possible to relax or maybe remove this check?
- Can we switch the
Thanh, Anil, couple of things:
- I see lot of issues with the docs linkcheck (multiple rechecks required to pass a build), would it be possible to relax or maybe remove this check?
- Can we switch the
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13189
·
|