|
Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
The patches are being merged now, expect some usual disruption while
they are being merged.
Regards,
Robert
The patches are being merged now, expect some usual disruption while
they are being merged.
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13287
·
|
|
Re: [kernel-dev] [release] [app-dev] Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
Hmm, weird, why is this even needed?
It does look like ConfigProperties.getProperty() requires OSGi runtime
to execute -- which your UT is not.
We typically reserve this to the runtime, where
Hmm, weird, why is this even needed?
It does look like ConfigProperties.getProperty() requires OSGi runtime
to execute -- which your UT is not.
We typically reserve this to the runtime, where
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13286
·
|
|
Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
The MRI update for this release is staged here:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:mri-aluminium-sr1
Multipatch build passed
The MRI update for this release is staged here:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:mri-aluminium-sr1
Multipatch build passed
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13285
·
|
|
Re: [release] [app-dev] Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
FYI, here are the patches to move netvirt project to SM:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:netvirt-sm
We might need to expedite these patches if netvirt project keeps blocking the
FYI, here are the patches to move netvirt project to SM:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:netvirt-sm
We might need to expedite these patches if netvirt project keeps blocking the
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13284
·
|
|
Re: [release] [app-dev] Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
Hi Robert,
I had spent some time today on looking at netvirt patch[0] and fixed a few of errors and still not able to identify the root cause of the below jenkins ERRORs.
Please let us know if
Hi Robert,
I had spent some time today on looking at netvirt patch[0] and fixed a few of errors and still not able to identify the root cause of the below jenkins ERRORs.
Please let us know if
|
By
Karthikeyan
·
#13283
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
I do not have objections to this proposal. Also starting the first elections right away seems better than waiting.
I do not have objections to this proposal. Also starting the first elections right away seems better than waiting.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13282
·
|
|
Re: Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
As a reminder, we will proceed with Aluminium code freeze for SR1... I'll pick a RC then and hopefully we can have the community to help with this release.
Thanks
As a reminder, we will proceed with Aluminium code freeze for SR1... I'll pick a RC then and hopefully we can have the community to help with this release.
Thanks
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13281
·
|
|
Re: TSC Vote on OpenFlow Plugin Committer nomination - Robert Varga
With 6 votes, the vote passes - so Robert is now a committer on the OpenFlow Plugin project. Please follow the standard process (yaml, etc.) to get the committer rights assigned.
With 6 votes, the vote passes - so Robert is now a committer on the OpenFlow Plugin project. Please follow the standard process (yaml, etc.) to get the committer rights assigned.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13280
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
Why not do the following?
Declare we will have 2 elections - one main election immediately and another one 3 months after the main election to give new members a chance to establish
Why not do the following?
Declare we will have 2 elections - one main election immediately and another one 3 months after the main election to give new members a chance to establish
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13279
·
|
|
TSC Vote for OpenDaylight Dev Best Practices Document
Hi TSC members,
Please vote to formalize the developer best practices document
Hi TSC members,
Please vote to formalize the developer best practices document
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13278
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
Fair enough, what if we just start an "open" thread before the official nomination period to see who has intention to self-nominate? although this is not final, it can give us a faster feedback than
Fair enough, what if we just start an "open" thread before the official nomination period to see who has intention to self-nominate? although this is not final, it can give us a faster feedback than
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13277
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
Hi all
Following today TSC call, here is my feedback on the topic.
Today we do not have any certainty on the number of people who are interested to present themselves to joint the TSC,
and moreover on
Hi all
Following today TSC call, here is my feedback on the topic.
Today we do not have any certainty on the number of people who are interested to present themselves to joint the TSC,
and moreover on
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#13276
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
I thought from previous conversation we could reach 5 seats easily (e.g. Robert, Guillaume, Rangan, Anil and myself), but if not, lets go for 3.
BR/Luis
I thought from previous conversation we could reach 5 seats easily (e.g. Robert, Guillaume, Rangan, Anil and myself), but if not, lets go for 3.
BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13275
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
I think with the low participation happening at this point, that lesser
seats is better otherwise you end up filling seats with folks that really
will not participate and any
I think with the low participation happening at this point, that lesser
seats is better otherwise you end up filling seats with folks that really
will not participate and any
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13274
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
Please continue the governance discussion here so we can reach concrete proposals for TSC vote. I personally do not see difference between "5 seats now + 2 seats later" vs "5 seats now and new TSC
Please continue the governance discussion here so we can reach concrete proposals for TSC vote. I personally do not see difference between "5 seats now + 2 seats later" vs "5 seats now and new TSC
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13273
·
|
|
Re: [release] OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
Hello Daya,
No worries, this seems to confirm my suspicion on what this provides.
Just to clarify:
1) does current state of affairs include anything from Gap/Future
Developments (slide 11)
Hello Daya,
No worries, this seems to confirm my suspicion on what this provides.
Just to clarify:
1) does current state of affairs include anything from Gap/Future
Developments (slide 11)
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13272
·
|
|
Re: [release] OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
Thanks for the pointer, but this presentation seems to be protected. Can
you make it public perhaps?
Thanks,
Robert
Thanks for the pointer, but this presentation seems to be protected. Can
you make it public perhaps?
Thanks,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13271
·
|
|
Re: [release] Drawing new contributors with simple tasks
Hi all
Abhijit, Robert, thank you a lot for your kind feedbacks.
Abhijit, I am fine with moving this at the top of the wiki
I also agree with Robert that it would be better placed in the
Hi all
Abhijit, Robert, thank you a lot for your kind feedbacks.
Abhijit, I am fine with moving this at the top of the wiki
I also agree with Robert that it would be better placed in the
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#13270
·
|
|
Re: TSC Vote on OpenFlow Plugin Committer nomination - Robert Varga
We have received 5 votes from TSC so far, please vote.
Regards,
Arun
We have received 5 votes from TSC so far, please vote.
Regards,
Arun
|
By
d.arunprakash@...
·
#13269
·
|
|
TSC Meeting Agenda for October 22, 2020 at 9 am Pacific
Next ODL TSC meeting is October 22, 2020 at 9 am Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/219174946?pwd=aW9uSXl0KzJpcjRXY3l1bWIwdG9KZz09.
Agenda for this meeting is
Next ODL TSC meeting is October 22, 2020 at 9 am Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/219174946?pwd=aW9uSXl0KzJpcjRXY3l1bWIwdG9KZz09.
Agenda for this meeting is
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13268
·
|