TSC@lists.opendaylight.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release

Eh, sorry, I have one critical patch to NETCONF, will merge it as soon it verifies. It is a blocking issue going as far as Sodium SR4, so we definitely want it in SR1. Details are at

By Robert Varga · #13293 ·

TWS session Nov 2, 2020 - NetConf WG Status

Hi folks, The next week TWS session will be on Nov 2, 2020 at 9 am Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/522266747?pwd=ek1mZHpXY1FzTms5Z1FYRjlZQkZBUT09. The meeting page

By Abhijit Kumbhare · #13292 ·

Re: NetConf WG status

Manoj, We have decided to move the topic to next week. I will send out a separate email for the topic. -Abhijit

By Abhijit Kumbhare · #13291 ·

Re: NetConf WG status

Hi All, Are we having this meeting today? Best Regards, Manoj

By manoj chokka · #13290 ·

Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release

Thanks Robert. @Anil Belur please proceed with Aluminium code freeze as requested

By Daniel de la Rosa · #13289 ·

Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release

This activity is now done, the branch is back to normal as of https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/distribution-merge-managed-aluminium/2580/. Regards, Robert

By Robert Varga · #13288 ·

Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release

The patches are being merged now, expect some usual disruption while they are being merged. Regards, Robert

By Robert Varga · #13287 ·

Re: [kernel-dev] [release] [app-dev] Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now

Hmm, weird, why is this even needed? It does look like ConfigProperties.getProperty() requires OSGi runtime to execute -- which your UT is not. We typically reserve this to the runtime, where

By Robert Varga · #13286 ·

Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release

The MRI update for this release is staged here: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:mri-aluminium-sr1 Multipatch build passed

By Robert Varga · #13285 ·

Re: [release] [app-dev] Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now

FYI, here are the patches to move netvirt project to SM: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:netvirt-sm We might need to expedite these patches if netvirt project keeps blocking the

By Luis Gomez · #13284 ·

Re: [release] [app-dev] Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now

Hi Robert, I had spent some time today on looking at netvirt patch[0] and fixed a few of errors and still not able to identify the root cause of the below jenkins ERRORs. Please let us know if

By Karthikeyan · #13283 ·

Re: Governance Discussion

I do not have objections to this proposal. Also starting the first elections right away seems better than waiting.

By Luis Gomez · #13282 ·

Re: Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release

As a reminder, we will proceed with Aluminium code freeze for SR1... I'll pick a RC then and hopefully we can have the community to help with this release. Thanks

By Daniel de la Rosa · #13281 ·

Re: TSC Vote on OpenFlow Plugin Committer nomination - Robert Varga

With 6 votes, the vote passes - so Robert is now a committer on the OpenFlow Plugin project. Please follow the standard process (yaml, etc.) to get the committer rights assigned.

By Abhijit Kumbhare · #13280 ·

Re: Governance Discussion

Why not do the following? Declare we will have 2 elections - one main election immediately and another one 3 months after the main election to give new members a chance to establish

By Abhijit Kumbhare · #13279 ·

TSC Vote for OpenDaylight Dev Best Practices Document

Hi TSC members, Please vote to formalize the developer best practices document

By Abhijit Kumbhare · #13278 ·

Re: Governance Discussion

Fair enough, what if we just start an "open" thread before the official nomination period to see who has intention to self-nominate? although this is not final, it can give us a faster feedback than

By Luis Gomez · #13277 ·

Re: Governance Discussion

Hi all Following today TSC call, here is my feedback on the topic. Today we do not have any certainty on the number of people who are interested to present themselves to joint the TSC, and moreover on

By Guillaume Lambert · #13276 ·

Re: Governance Discussion

I thought from previous conversation we could reach 5 seats easily (e.g. Robert, Guillaume, Rangan, Anil and myself), but if not, lets go for 3. BR/Luis

By Luis Gomez · #13275 ·

Re: Governance Discussion

I think with the low participation happening at this point, that lesser seats is better otherwise you end up filling seats with folks that really will not participate and any

By JamO Luhrsen · #13274 ·

1141 - 1160 of 14433

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms