|
Re: [integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
OK guys, I just realized we just released the wrong branch for the common distribution (master vs stable/silicon). Basically because distribution jobs were not updated when we branched off
OK guys, I just realized we just released the wrong branch for the common distribution (master vs stable/silicon). Basically because distribution jobs were not updated when we branched off
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13608
·
|
|
Re: [integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
OK here is the Silicon release:
https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/0.14.0/
We can proceed with the rest of the stuff
OK here is the Silicon release:
https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/0.14.0/
We can proceed with the rest of the stuff
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13607
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] Unimgr committer nominations
Hey guys,
Thanks for the reminder, it seems to have slipped through. I have placed
in on the agenda today:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/display/ODL/2021-04-01+TSC+Minutes
Thanks,
Robert
Hey guys,
Thanks for the reminder, it seems to have slipped through. I have placed
in on the agenda today:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/display/ODL/2021-04-01+TSC+Minutes
Thanks,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13606
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] Unimgr committer nominations
Hi Mahesh,
Good reminder. Checking the past few TSC meeting minutes, it has not been discussed yet.
Donald.
Hi Mahesh,
Good reminder. Checking the past few TSC meeting minutes, it has not been discussed yet.
Donald.
|
By
Donald Hunter
·
#13605
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] Unimgr committer nominations
Hi Donald/TSC,
Any word on the approval of this?
Thanks.
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@...
Hi Donald/TSC,
Any word on the approval of this?
Thanks.
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@...
|
By
Mahesh Jethanandani
·
#13604
·
|
|
Navid to Proxy Anil on TSC Meeting (01-04-2021)
Hi TSC team:
Navid has agreed to Proxy for the TSC Meeting 01-04-2021. It's a public holiday on 02 April (Good Friday), I'll try to join the meeting from outside, if possible.
Cheers,
Anil
Hi TSC team:
Navid has agreed to Proxy for the TSC Meeting 01-04-2021. It's a public holiday on 02 April (Good Friday), I'll try to join the meeting from outside, if possible.
Cheers,
Anil
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13603
·
|
|
TSC Meeting for April 1st , 2021 at 10 pm Pacific
Hello OpenDaylight Community,
Next TSC meeting is April 1st, 2021 at 10 pm Pacific Time.
The agenda proposal and the connection details for this meeting are available at the following
Hello OpenDaylight Community,
Next TSC meeting is April 1st, 2021 at 10 pm Pacific Time.
The agenda proposal and the connection details for this meeting are available at the following
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#13602
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Hello
Correct, I just released TransportPCE artifacts version 3.0.0 for Silicon.
Release job logs are available at this
Hello
Correct, I just released TransportPCE artifacts version 3.0.0 for Silicon.
Release job logs are available at this
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#13601
·
|
|
Re: Phosphorus release schedule update
Hi Daniel
Sure, I will prepare a change for that.
Note that the docs master branch still points to Silicon for the moment.
We have to wait for the stable/silicon branch creation to make the
Hi Daniel
Sure, I will prepare a change for that.
Note that the docs master branch still points to Silicon for the moment.
We have to wait for the stable/silicon branch creation to make the
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#13600
·
|
|
Phosphorus release schedule update
Hello Documentation team
Could you please help me update ODL Phosphorus release schedule. Basically replace Aluminium with Phosphorus
Hello Documentation team
Could you please help me update ODL Phosphorus release schedule. Basically replace Aluminium with Phosphorus
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13599
·
|
|
[release][TSC] Magnesium EOL - purge jobs on releng/builder
Greetings all:
OpenDaylight Silicon is released which makes Magnesium support EOL official. The below CR removes all the Magnesium jobs from ODL releng/builder repo and
Greetings all:
OpenDaylight Silicon is released which makes Magnesium support EOL official. The below CR removes all the Magnesium jobs from ODL releng/builder repo and
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13598
·
|
|
Re: [E] Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
That’s correct Daniel!
Here is the link to all release notes: https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/release-notes/index.html
We need each PTL to check his/her project’s release notes and
That’s correct Daniel!
Here is the link to all release notes: https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/release-notes/index.html
We need each PTL to check his/her project’s release notes and
|
By
Ghazisaidi, Navid
·
#13597
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Thanks Anil. I believe that @LAMBERT Guillaume TGI/OLN is already working on the Transport PCE Silicon release. Also I believe that the release notes are being done automatically but
Thanks Anil. I believe that @LAMBERT Guillaume TGI/OLN is already working on the Transport PCE Silicon release. Also I believe that the release notes are being done automatically but
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13596
·
|
|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Hello All,
OpenDaylight Silicon version bump is complete and the staging repository has been promoted. The 'stable/silicon' branch is unlocked and ready for development.
Pending activities required to
Hello All,
OpenDaylight Silicon version bump is complete and the staging repository has been promoted. The 'stable/silicon' branch is unlocked and ready for development.
Pending activities required to
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13595
·
|
|
Re: Silicon GA release approval
Hello all,
Now that Silicon has been approved, @Anil Belur please proceed to publish the released artifacts
Thank you all
Hello all,
Now that Silicon has been approved, @Anil Belur please proceed to publish the released artifacts
Thank you all
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13594
·
|
|
Re: [release] [integration-dev] Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
I've built new images with OVS 2.8 on Ubuntu18.04.
"ZZCI - Ubuntu 18.04 - mininet-ovs-28 - x86_64 - 20210329-150700.140" (label: ubuntu1804-mininet-ovs-28-1c-4g)
Please review the change, needs to be
I've built new images with OVS 2.8 on Ubuntu18.04.
"ZZCI - Ubuntu 18.04 - mininet-ovs-28 - x86_64 - 20210329-150700.140" (label: ubuntu1804-mininet-ovs-28-1c-4g)
Please review the change, needs to be
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13593
·
|
|
Re: [release] [integration-dev] Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
Well, I do not think ODL OpenStack projects are active anymore, so a single version OVS VM should be sufficient. Anyway, what are the labels for the new images?
BR/Luis
Well, I do not think ODL OpenStack projects are active anymore, so a single version OVS VM should be sufficient. Anyway, what are the labels for the new images?
BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13592
·
|
|
Re: [release] [integration-dev] Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
If I remember correctly as discussed in the integration team meetings, OVS version was dependent on the OpenStack dev version (Rocky, Queens) as tested with the CSIT jobs.
It's up to the $project to
If I remember correctly as discussed in the integration team meetings, OVS version was dependent on the OpenStack dev version (Rocky, Queens) as tested with the CSIT jobs.
It's up to the $project to
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13591
·
|
|
Re: [integration-dev] Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
These CR's should fix the build failures on Ubuntu 18.04, and installing broken dependencies with ovs 2.6.
These CR's should fix the build failures on Ubuntu 18.04, and installing broken dependencies with ovs 2.6.
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13590
·
|
|
Re: [release] [integration-dev] Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
+1, if UB18 packages bring a newer OVS version, we can very well use that. I remember the main reason for overwriting the OVS version was to get newer version of OVS.
+1, if UB18 packages bring a newer OVS version, we can very well use that. I remember the main reason for overwriting the OVS version was to get newer version of OVS.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13589
·
|