|
Re: [release] Sulfur code freeze
ok @Ha, Sangwook and all TSC, if you are ok with releasing Sulfur in its current state, AR#30 and integration #220, please approve it at
ok @Ha, Sangwook and all TSC, if you are ok with releasing Sulfur in its current state, AR#30 and integration #220, please approve it at
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14147
·
|
|
MRI projects in churn
Hey everyone, especially those working on ODL
We are currently transitioning to JDK17 as part of Chlorine MRI bump.
Unfortunately we are at this point 11 days past the deadline, so things are moving
Hey everyone, especially those working on ODL
We are currently transitioning to JDK17 as part of Chlorine MRI bump.
Unfortunately we are at this point 11 days past the deadline, so things are moving
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14146
·
|
|
Re: [release] Sulfur code freeze
So we have latest AR here: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/autorelease-release-sulfur-mvn38-openjdk11/29/
Triggered by Sangwook, because the previous run failed. We can expect AR #30 in
So we have latest AR here: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/autorelease-release-sulfur-mvn38-openjdk11/29/
Triggered by Sangwook, because the previous run failed. We can expect AR #30 in
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14145
·
|
|
Re: Old RESTCONF northbound scheduled for removal
[snip]
The old implementation is no longer present in netconf/master, hence this item is slated for delivery in 2022.09 Chlorine.
Regards,
Robert
[snip]
The old implementation is no longer present in netconf/master, hence this item is slated for delivery in 2022.09 Chlorine.
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14144
·
|
|
Re: The road to Java 17
Hello again,
[snip]
These issues have been addressed.
Both these items are delivered, all projects participating on Sulfur GA verify each patch with both JDK11 and JDK17.
This is now slated for
Hello again,
[snip]
These issues have been addressed.
Both these items are delivered, all projects participating on Sulfur GA verify each patch with both JDK11 and JDK17.
This is now slated for
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14143
·
|
|
Re: [release] Switching default build node to centos8-builder-4c-4g
Hmm, that would be a major problem and really soon. Sigul is part of stage jobs -- stage i.e. build + sign. We are exactly 2 patches away from odlparent/master requiring JDK17 to build -- and that
Hmm, that would be a major problem and really soon. Sigul is part of stage jobs -- stage i.e. build + sign. We are exactly 2 patches away from odlparent/master requiring JDK17 to build -- and that
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14142
·
|
|
Re: [release] Switching default build node to centos8-builder-4c-4g
+1 We should be able switch to CentOS8 for the jobs that require JDK17, but there could be a few caveats that we should consider before we move the rest of the builders nodes.
Sigul (artifact
+1 We should be able switch to CentOS8 for the jobs that require JDK17, but there could be a few caveats that we should consider before we move the rest of the builders nodes.
Sigul (artifact
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14141
·
|
|
Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Switching default build node to centos8-builder-4c-4g
+1
Od: release@... <release@...> v mene používateľa Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
Odoslané: piatok, 22. apríla 2022 1:57:03
Komu: Robert Varga
Kópia: infrastructure@...; release@...;
+1
Od: release@... <release@...> v mene používateľa Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
Odoslané: piatok, 22. apríla 2022 1:57:03
Komu: Robert Varga
Kópia: infrastructure@...; release@...;
|
By
Ivan Hrasko
·
#14140
·
|
|
Re: Switching default build node to centos8-builder-4c-4g
LGTM, any change for updating current infra is +1 for me :)
LGTM, any change for updating current infra is +1 for me :)
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14139
·
|
|
Re: [integration-dev] [releng][TSC] Sulfur release status - master branch has been locked
Hello all,
The version bump is complete, the master branch is promoted to the next release (Chlorine) and the "stable/sulfur" branch has been created.
Note: The master branch (Chlorine) is unlocked
Hello all,
The version bump is complete, the master branch is promoted to the next release (Chlorine) and the "stable/sulfur" branch has been created.
Note: The master branch (Chlorine) is unlocked
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14138
·
|
|
[integration-dev] [releng][TSC] Sulfur release status - master branch has been locked
Hello all,
The master branch is locked for Sulfur code freeze and branch cutting ("stable/sulfur") and master branch will be promoted to next (Chlorine), which will be the development version. Once
Hello all,
The master branch is locked for Sulfur code freeze and branch cutting ("stable/sulfur") and master branch will be promoted to next (Chlorine), which will be the development version. Once
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14137
·
|
|
Switching default build node to centos8-builder-4c-4g
Hello everyone,
we are currently defaulting to centos7-builder-4c-4g here: https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blob/master/jjb/defaults.yaml#L19=
CentOS7 is ancient and cannot support our
Hello everyone,
we are currently defaulting to centos7-builder-4c-4g here: https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blob/master/jjb/defaults.yaml#L19=
CentOS7 is ancient and cannot support our
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14136
·
|
|
proxy for next TSC meeting
Hello
As discussed today, I won’t be able to attend next TSC meeting.
If needed, Cédric can be my proxy.
Kind Regards
Guillaume
Orange
Hello
As discussed today, I won’t be able to attend next TSC meeting.
If needed, Cédric can be my proxy.
Kind Regards
Guillaume
Orange
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#14135
·
|
|
Re: [release] Sulfur code freeze
Yes Anil is out this week so maybe @Andrew Grimberg can get somebody else to help with
https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/theme/portal/2/IT-23826
Anyhow, Integration test for AR#15
Yes Anil is out this week so maybe @Andrew Grimberg can get somebody else to help with
https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/theme/portal/2/IT-23826
Anyhow, Integration test for AR#15
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14134
·
|
|
Re: ODL modernization
OK, then maybe it will help some marketing and/or white paper if anyone knows about these use cases in more detail :)
Fair enough, I did not explained well myself, Java nano-service is still required
OK, then maybe it will help some marketing and/or white paper if anyone knows about these use cases in more detail :)
Fair enough, I did not explained well myself, Java nano-service is still required
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14133
·
|
|
Re: ODL modernization
Just to qualify this end-to-end in terms of the NETCONF/RESTCONF pass-through case.
netconf-maven-stage-master should produce a container containing the use-case, using whatever runtime (dynamic
Just to qualify this end-to-end in terms of the NETCONF/RESTCONF pass-through case.
netconf-maven-stage-master should produce a container containing the use-case, using whatever runtime (dynamic
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14132
·
|
|
Re: ODL modernization
Strictly speaking: we already do, but through external integrations and those bring very little in terms of engagement/contributions :(
Weeeeeeeeeell. I could *very easily* sell you OSGi as:
- the
Strictly speaking: we already do, but through external integrations and those bring very little in terms of engagement/contributions :(
Weeeeeeeeeell. I could *very easily* sell you OSGi as:
- the
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14131
·
|
|
Re: [release] Sulfur code freeze
So we still do not have that ticket taken care of, but I realized we can work it around by changing the builders -- which we did and I spent today releasing MRI projects, which are now integrated.
I
So we still do not have that ticket taken care of, but I realized we can work it around by changing the builders -- which we did and I spent today releasing MRI projects, which are now integrated.
I
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14130
·
|
|
Re: ODL modernization
Hello Luis
Thanks for this feedback. I mostly share your concerns here at least about 2 and 3.
(about 1, I am not very involved in cloud use-cases and the situation is a bit different in core
Hello Luis
Thanks for this feedback. I mostly share your concerns here at least about 2 and 3.
(about 1, I am not very involved in cloud use-cases and the situation is a bit different in core
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#14129
·
|
|
[tsc] Luis to proxy Anil on 14-04-2022
Hello TSC members:
I won't be able to attend the TSC call this week, Luis has agreed to be my proxy.
Cheers,
ab
Hello TSC members:
I won't be able to attend the TSC call this week, Luis has agreed to be my proxy.
Cheers,
ab
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14128
·
|