Dave (and other members of the community) - The folks that work here at BSN are here to make Daylight as successful as we can, but i) we owe transparency about our over-arching concern (that we

more details » OpenDaylight TSC Meeting Meeting URL: https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/meetings/join?uuid=MA3SRND964PIX06V2LS3SXX3RE-9VIB Access Information Meeting number: 194 548 370 Meeting

This event has been canceled and removed from your calendar. OpenDaylight TSC Meeting OpenDaylight Technical Steering Committee meeting. Please hold this time for the weekly OpenDaylight TSC

Hello Everyone: To provide a clean change to the TSC meeting invitation as we move from 1 hour to 2 hour meetings, I will be canceling the original meeting, and then sending a new invitation for the

BTW, it has been pointed out that I mis-attributed the IOCTL idea to Chris. That was my mistake. That said, the point I was making still holds, namely, that there exist some ideas (and there will be

All, As you know today (05.14.2013) was the day on which I wanted to have the single controller code base issue resolved. What I had said is that if we couldn't get the projects to agree on a

Folks, As TSC members will recall, I set a date of 05/13/2013 to have proposals for the single controller project on the table, and Rob asked a few questions about this on today's TSC call. Now,

* Rob Sherwood (rob.sherwood@...) wrote: No. Discuss is that way -->> discuss@...

Hello TSC Members: Here is the meeting access information for today's meeting. This is the same information currently on the wiki: When it's time, start the meeting from

And Rob, can you post to discuss? Thnx, --dmm

OK, I think the wiki is now fixed (thanks as always to Andrew Grimberg's prompt and expert responses). Rob, can you try to upload the Layered API proposal again? Phil.

Thanks Phil. --dmm

The proposal was waiting on moderator approval this morning and I released it to both Discuss and TSC lists a little while ago. The wiki issue seems to be a bug I'm working on right now. The file

Actually, now I see you only sent your proposal to tsc@ (unless I can't keep track of what is cross posted where, which has non-zero probability). Any reason why it can't go to discuss? --dmm

BTW, I updated the agenda to give you a slot; I'm thinking now I'm going to push everything else off so we can discuss moving forward. Also, thank you for posting your pdf to the discuss list (as you

Yea, I'm online now this morning and I'll get all of this moving guys. Phil.

Sure. Let me work on the agenda this AM. --dmm

Rob, I see that you tried to add a pdf to the "layered API proposal" that didn't make it (looks like size limitations). Can you work with Phil to get this posted? Thnx, --dmm

On May 9, 2013, at 8:43 AM, "Rob Sherwood" <rob.sherwood@...> wrote: I'd second that request. lets spend as much time on this as we need to discuss today. Tom

[resending without attachment -- can we please bump up the attachment file limit to something reasonable?] After looking in depth into the implications of Colin and Dave's proposal, we ran into a