TSC@lists.opendaylight.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Luis, We haven’t crossed M0 yet, because the SR plan has not been approved by the TSC. I am fundamentally opposed to approving a plan with Milestone dates in the past at time of approval. Ed

By Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> · #2013 ·

Re: draft lithium release plan

I believe we will need to find the right balance between very strict KDC vs very loose requirements. The first one has proved to fail in the past as being a dynamic project as we are we need

By Luis Gomez · #2012 ·

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Hydrogen distributions cleaning

Speaking as a sysadmin I honestly like RPMs as they make installing and managing software much easier on systems. Speaking as someone that helped get the Hydrogen RPMs packaged, doing this right is

By Andrew Grimberg · #2011 ·

Re: Hydrogen distributions cleaning

Cool about docker! Should we be trying to push on RPMs or find somebody that can help or have we decided that it's not that important? --Colin

By Colin Dixon · #2010 ·

Re: Hoping to wrap up leaf/SR discussion

While I like the idea, executing it would require a different release vehicle that we've done before. It would also require us to think about what we want from an SR in general. When it comes to the

By Colin Dixon · #2009 ·

Re: draft lithium release plan

Comments inline. +1 to this as guiding principles and goals. However, I think over-striving for KDC now, especially for later milestones, will have the frustrating property that we will be specifying

By Colin Dixon · #2008 ·

Re: Hydrogen distributions cleaning

Docker yes -> Daniel Ferrel RPM no

By Luis Gomez · #2007 ·

Re: draft lithium release plan

Hi Ed, Without going into your detailed comments (I need more time for that) I sent mail last week saying all “KDC" requirements should be finalized and agreed by M1 the latest so that projects can

By Luis Gomez · #2006 ·

Re: draft lithium release plan

General Comments: OMG this is so much improved over Helium/Hydrogen :) Principles to Consider: I would suggest that we consider the following principles in looking at the Simultaneous Release

By Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> · #2005 ·

Re: draft lithium release plan

Fully agree on Ed's point: "Further, I would strongly suggest that we adopt a calling out of Legacy(Stable APIs) rather than a calling out of Provisional/Tentative APIs. Unless we are going to

By Abhijit Kumbhare · #2004 ·

Re: draft lithium release plan

So… let me ask this question… can we actually realistically carry out this distinction before we have the necessary tooling in hand? Ed

By Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> · #2003 ·

Re: draft lithium release plan

I was thinking something similar, and concur. To my ear, a legacy API is something we expect to be deprecating sooner or later (other ears may disagree ;) ). So I second renaming Legacy API to

By Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> · #2002 ·

Re: Hoping to wrap up leaf/SR discussion

Perhaps we can extend the concept of offsets to not just milestones - but to the release itself? To illustrate with an example what I am saying: In the draft proposal currently we have M5 start of

By Abhijit Kumbhare · #2001 ·

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Hydrogen distributions cleaning

Well I know Docker has been done... we also package via Docker.. but I'll have more to talk about on this next week.. right now it's pretty much only ODL.. now I've been working on OVS, OS, and ODL in

By Mathieu Lemay <mlemay@...> · #2000 ·

Re: [opendaylight-dev] Hydrogen distributions cleaning

I honestly don't know about RPMs as doing them right isn't very easy given all the dependencies we currently have on external components. We could do the slipshod method we did for Hydrogen though...

By Andrew Grimberg · #1999 ·

Re: Hoping to wrap up leaf/SR discussion

Sorry for the delay. Comments inline. (I'd also love to hear feedback from others. Thanks to Luis for already giving some.) --Colin So, I think the the critical advantage in being part of the core SR

By Colin Dixon · #1998 ·

Re: Hydrogen distributions cleaning

Out of curiosity, are we planning to create new Helium (and beyond) Docker and RPM code? --Colin

By Colin Dixon · #1997 ·

Re: draft lithium release plan

I think we have three threads going on: 1.) Not everyone likes the term Legacy and I actually agree with Chris that Stable is a lot better. The definition actually does match that since it says those

By Colin Dixon · #1996 ·

Re: draft lithium release plan

The intent was that all new APIs are provisional in their first release. If they're released and not going to change in the next release they'd be legacy or stable in that release. Does that make

By Colin Dixon · #1995 ·

watch es +ph0nes,jewelry . gorgeous! t

offer - jewelry etc inexpensive. All you wish+ discount. .gratify your darling! - http://x.co/5hybA ogi oz zdext yer wvo emh ow e q lcxr wpzoq sle fs dyt w ssn n wtlq n x c sbyq dzzaz gru prnv czsdt

By VIP Goods <dinonationblog@...> · #1994 ·

12421 - 12440 of 14433

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms