* David Meyer (dmm@...) wrote: Agreed, non-starter. I actually think this is quite similar to or at least a variant of what you've outlined in your proposal below. BTW, let's keep this to the

[04/29/2013] As you may know, there have been several proposals floated to deal with the problems created by the fact that we have two controller code bases. These include but not limited to:

As discussed during the TSC meeting of 2013-04-25, the TSC has the following comments on TSC_policy.doc: (i). Comment to the Board: The TSC recommends replacing the word 'mature' in

Hi Phil, In general Tuesdays work for me I don't have anything recurring that cannot be shuffled. / Chris From: Phil Robb <probb@...> Date: Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:15 PM To: "tsc@..."

5-6 EST is getting a bit late for east coast folks. --Tom From: Phil Robb <probb@...> Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 11:28 AM To: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@...> Cc: "tsc@..." <tsc@...> Subject: Re:

2:00pm PDT on Tuesdays works for me generally, but I have a conflict on 5/7 till 2:30p. Best, abhishek

Hi Tom: Thanks for your quick response. Some of the attendees have a conflict at 1:30pm PDT on Tuesdays. Would 2pm PDT on Tuesdays work? We will start after next week (on May 7th). Does 2:00pm PDT

From: Phil Robb <probb@...> Date: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:15 PM To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...> Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Increasing TSC meetings to twice per week Can we make it at 1:30? If we keep it

Hello OpenDaylight TSC Members: As Dave mentioned in a previous mail, the TSC is not making as much progress as is needed during the weekly calls that are occurring. While the discussions and

I guess any motions that are raised during the call, in cases where %100 of members are not there, must then also be sent out via email (with an expiration date to absentee votes). Although we should

Great suggestions. --dmm

* David Meyer (dmm@...) wrote: <snip> Here are a couple concrete steps we could follow to encourage more email use: 1) require that all agenda items are added to the wiki w/in Xhrs/days of the

* Rob Sherwood (rob.sherwood@...) wrote: Yes

Not a problem. --dmm

For clarity, you might also want to add that comments 4 through 6 are in reference to the "Scope" portion of the document. Phil. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@...>

The list definitely looks accurate - thanks Ed. One thing: I'm sure that Dave, Benson, Chris and others will provide the necessary context around these changes, but I can imagine if you see these

Thanks Ed. This looks to accurately capture what we decided. Others: If you have corrections/discussion points/etc please get those to the list by COB and I will synthesize a package for the Board

All, thanks for the thoughts. A few comments: First, I don't want to see any TSC member disenfranchised due to travel, overbooking, etc. We're all busy. In addition,, according to Robert's Rules of

Hi, Rob. Just my opinion as an observer of the TSC: First, if the TSC ever needs such a mechanism, I'd suggest a web poll. It's much easier than asking somebody to

Please find enumerated below the comments of the TSC on the Boards TSC-policies doc. In addition, please find attached a redline of that doc. This is an output of the 2013-04-25 TSC meeting. Please