In discussing this with Phil he pointed out that we need to bring the developer tools admins into this conversation before we make any decisions. Basically we need to know what is possible with our

The lead administrator for the OpenDaylight tools is Andrew Grimberg (cc-ed). In short, I would suggest making this a forward looking policy as opposed to an immediate implementation. I.e. keep the

* Aleksandar Miljusevic (miljusevic@...) wrote: It's editable now. You need to log in. Perhaps you simply need an account? thanks, -chris

* Chris Wright (chrisw@...) wrote: FYI, I updated the wiki landing page to include a pointer to the account system. The direct link is

Thanks Chris. --dmm

I have tried to capture the details of our discussion last week. Please comment on the proposal below so that we can amend the process as soon as possible. --Tom Email-based or Proxy-based

Thanks Tom. A few questions/comments in line. --dmm

* David Meyer (dmm@...) wrote: That's boilerplate from the original. OpenStack has a TC (Technical Committee), which is built of PTLs (Project Technical Leads) and 5 community voted

* Thomas Nadeau (tnadeau@...) wrote: Come to think of it, we don't actually have "the development" list. We have "the discuss" list, or "the TSC" list. Capturing the spirit here, it'd be

First off, Dave, do you have the editing pen now for this? Right, no vote == abstain. You need some default state. It seems the most obvious route is no vote == abstain to

No, not unless you need me to take it. --dmm

Hello TSC Members: Please indicate below what times work for you for an added weekly TSC meeting. You can put an "X", a "Y", or "Yes".. whatever you prefer under *ALL* of the times that would work

All, Since I have asked the "controller" and "net-virt-platform" teams to look at a resolution proposal, I'm looking for a progress report (if any). Thnx, --dmm

Colin and Dave are going to pitch their merged plan in about 40 minutes. I'm still trying to understand the details but it seems to have some strong points. - Rob .

<rob.sherwood@...> wrote: Understand that, was wondering if there were other proposals that were equally details --dmm

OK -- just so it's said, I consider Colin and Dave's proposal to be simply a more well thought out and detailed version of my proposal that I pitched on

<rob.sherwood@...> wrote: Actually both your proposal and whether or not what Colin/David are suggesting is the same thing as you have proposed are items for discussion. --dmm

* Thomas Nadeau (tnadeau@...) wrote: Sorry, that's just me not being able to read. I read "no-vote" as a vote for "no" rather than not voting. thanks, -chris

https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSC:Main#Meeting_Agenda Thnx, --dmm

Can you restate what your proposal is and how it fits into the framework we just heard from Colin and David (if indeed it does)? IMO this would be very helpful for the community and would help us