|
[opendaylight.org #69767] [linuxfoundation.org #69767] Re: ODL Jenkins/nexus outage
Same goes for 4c-16g slaves:
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/label/centos7-autorelease-4c-16g/load-statistics
which means autorelease-sodium-openjdk11 #40 has been sitting there for
more
Same goes for 4c-16g slaves:
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/label/centos7-autorelease-4c-16g/load-statistics
which means autorelease-sodium-openjdk11 #40 has been sitting there for
more
|
By
Robert Varga via RT <helpdesk@...>
·
#11176
·
|
|
Re: ODL Jenkins/nexus outage
Same goes for 4c-16g slaves:
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/label/centos7-autorelease-4c-16g/load-statistics
which means autorelease-sodium-openjdk11 #40 has been sitting there for
more
Same goes for 4c-16g slaves:
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/label/centos7-autorelease-4c-16g/load-statistics
which means autorelease-sodium-openjdk11 #40 has been sitting there for
more
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11175
·
|
|
ODL Jenkins/nexus outage
Hello,
it seems our cloud is experiencing issues:
https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/bgpcep-maven-verify-sodium-mvn35-openjdk8/30/console.log.gz:
Furthermore:
1) we do not
Hello,
it seems our cloud is experiencing issues:
https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/bgpcep-maven-verify-sodium-mvn35-openjdk8/30/console.log.gz:
Furthermore:
1) we do not
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11174
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
Doh, https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/80810
Regards,
Robert
Doh, https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/80810
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11173
·
|
|
Re: [genius-dev] Vote on Hema as new Genius PTL
With this, Hema will be the new PTL for Genius. Congrats Hema!
I will update the wiki accordingly.
FYI, TSC.
Thanks,
Faseela
With this, Hema will be the new PTL for Genius. Congrats Hema!
I will update the wiki accordingly.
FYI, TSC.
Thanks,
Faseela
|
By
Faseela K
·
#11172
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
FYI I also opened this bug, it does not seem to impact functionality but it floods the log when there many RIB entries (e.g. scale test):
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-869
BR/Luis
FYI I also opened this bug, it does not seem to impact functionality but it floods the log when there many RIB entries (e.g. scale test):
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-869
BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11171
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
Great. Thanks for the info.
Great. Thanks for the info.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#11170
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
I think so, AR #55 should be good to go AFAICT.
Bye,
Robert
I think so, AR #55 should be good to go AFAICT.
Bye,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11169
·
|
|
Re: [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
So we're down to these two issues:
I don't think this is a blocker, as it should not affect real
functionality -- extra EOR is a NOOP if I remember correctly. We can
punt this to SR1.
As mentioned
So we're down to these two issues:
I don't think this is a blocker, as it should not affect real
functionality -- extra EOR is a NOOP if I remember correctly. We can
punt this to SR1.
As mentioned
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11167
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
So - are we good to go from BGPCEP side?
So - are we good to go from BGPCEP side?
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#11168
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
Yes, issue #4 is fixed by
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/80796/, as that shortens the
capability sufficiently to fit into 255 bytes. Long-term fix is tracked
here:
Yes, issue #4 is fixed by
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/80796/, as that shortens the
capability sufficiently to fit into 255 bytes. Long-term fix is tracked
here:
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11166
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
According to this:
https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/bgpcep-csit-1node-gate-userfeatures-all-neon/14/robot-plugin/log.html.gz#s1-s16
Patch
According to this:
https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/bgpcep-csit-1node-gate-userfeatures-all-neon/14/robot-plugin/log.html.gz#s1-s16
Patch
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11165
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
Sure I just triggered CSIT for the unmerged patches.
Sure I just triggered CSIT for the unmerged patches.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11164
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
Alright, I think we have all the patches lined up, some
(https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/status:merged+project:bgpcep+branch:stable/neon)
are already merged.
Luis, can you give
Alright, I think we have all the patches lined up, some
(https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/status:merged+project:bgpcep+branch:stable/neon)
are already merged.
Luis, can you give
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11163
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
Nevermind that, the calculation is right, but the length actually works
out to be greater than 255 (note how the OPEN message is 336 bytes) and
hence "51" really wants to say
Nevermind that, the calculation is right, but the length actually works
out to be greater than 255 (note how the OPEN message is 336 bytes) and
hence "51" really wants to say
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11162
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
That is odd, I cannot quite wrap my mind around where we are losing
those three bytes. Can you re-run with
org.opendaylight.protocol.bgp.parser.impl.message.open set to TRACE, please?
Thanks,
Robert
That is odd, I cannot quite wrap my mind around where we are losing
those three bytes. Can you re-run with
org.opendaylight.protocol.bgp.parser.impl.message.open set to TRACE, please?
Thanks,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11161
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
Yeah, after looking at the wire trace I think ODL is setting the wrong length:
- Optional parameters length should be 54 vs 51
- Capability parameter length should be 52 vs 49
BR/Luis
Yeah, after looking at the wire trace I think ODL is setting the wrong length:
- Optional parameters length should be 54 vs 51
- Capability parameter length should be 52 vs 49
BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11160
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
This is the log on the ExaBGP side, I also attach wireshark trace (.1 is controller, .20 is ExaBGP):
Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:53:05 | DEBUG | 4819 | wire | Attempting connection to
This is the log on the ExaBGP side, I also attach wireshark trace (.1 is controller, .20 is ExaBGP):
Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:53:05 | DEBUG | 4819 | wire | Attempting connection to
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11159
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
Yeah, this is one the test does not store the ExaBGP output so I will have to try manually in my setup. I will do that today.
Yeah, this is one the test does not store the ExaBGP output so I will have to try manually in my setup. I will do that today.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11158
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] [release] Neon Status RC2 - candidate sign off
[snip]
This one is beyond my robot-fu. Where can I find the exabgp output? is
it stored somewhere in robot?
Thanks,
Robert
[snip]
This one is beyond my robot-fu. Where can I find the exabgp output? is
it stored somewhere in robot?
Thanks,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#11157
·
|