|
TSC Meeting Agenda for Feb 21, 2019
Please note that ONAP representatives are coming to discuss the CII badging / vulnerabilities this time.
Here is the overall meeting agenda at a high
Please note that ONAP representatives are coming to discuss the CII badging / vulnerabilities this time.
Here is the overall meeting agenda at a high
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#11116
·
|
|
Approved: Faseela as NetVirt Committer
+1
The vote carries with 8 votes already - out of possible 13 - none against. Please work with Helpdesk for committer rights - and please update the NetVirt wiki active committer list to include
+1
The vote carries with 8 votes already - out of possible 13 - none against. Please work with Helpdesk for committer rights - and please update the NetVirt wiki active committer list to include
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#11115
·
|
|
Re: Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
+1
By
Anil Belur
·
#11114
·
|
|
Re: Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
+1
Thanh
By
Thanh Ha <thanh.ha@...>
·
#11113
·
|
|
Re: Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
+1
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11112
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
Just on note: if your pom.xml file has the mdsal binding-parent as parent, you do not need to declare individual mdsal artifacts version as these get automatically resolved via maven transitive
Just on note: if your pom.xml file has the mdsal binding-parent as parent, you do not need to declare individual mdsal artifacts version as these get automatically resolved via maven transitive
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11111
·
|
|
Re: Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
+1,
Best Regards,
An Ho
By
an.ho@huawei.com
·
#11110
·
|
|
Re: Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
+1
--
Thanks
Anil
By
Anil Vishnoi
·
#11109
·
|
|
Re: Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
Sam Hague <shague@...> wrote:
+1
Regards,
Stephen
Sam Hague <shague@...> wrote:
+1
Regards,
Stephen
|
By
Stephen Kitt <skitt@...>
·
#11108
·
|
|
Re: Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
+1
By
Sam Hague <shague@...>
·
#11107
·
|
|
Approval for Faseela as NetVirt Committer
Hi TSC,
please vote to approve Faseela as a committer in NetVirt. The NetVirt committers have voted to approve the nomination in the vote email [1].
Thanks, Sam
[1]
Hi TSC,
please vote to approve Faseela as a committer in NetVirt. The NetVirt committers have voted to approve the nomination in the vote email [1].
Thanks, Sam
[1]
|
By
Sam Hague <shague@...>
·
#11106
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
I guess we have here a confusion between mdsal binding-parent and mdsal binding.model.
My point was that they use different revisions and that binding.model versions are not documented anywhere, nor
I guess we have here a confusion between mdsal binding-parent and mdsal binding.model.
My point was that they use different revisions and that binding.model versions are not documented anywhere, nor
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#11105
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects check
Update: sorry, the question 2 should be fine (I just saw that project’s stable branch should remain locked, and can still summit gerrit by super committer).
Christine
From:謝宜玲
Update: sorry, the question 2 should be fine (I just saw that project’s stable branch should remain locked, and can still summit gerrit by super committer).
Christine
From:謝宜玲
|
By
ylhsieh@...
·
#11104
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects check
Hi,
As the doc [1] indicates self-managed project to add to the distribution sanity test [4], but I can’t push to releng/builder repo, is the repo locked? Besides, snmp4sdn repo’s stable/neon
Hi,
As the doc [1] indicates self-managed project to add to the distribution sanity test [4], but I can’t push to releng/builder repo, is the repo locked? Besides, snmp4sdn repo’s stable/neon
|
By
ylhsieh@...
·
#11103
·
|
|
Re: ODL DDF
Please put up your topics here:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Sodium_Dev_Forum
I have also linked the above URL from https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events.
Please put up your topics here:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Sodium_Dev_Forum
I have also linked the above URL from https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#11102
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
Hi Guillome,
If you see the link: https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/integration-distribution/en/latest/platform-versions.html, you will see mdsal version for Neon is 3.0.6.
Hi Guillome,
If you see the link: https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/integration-distribution/en/latest/platform-versions.html, you will see mdsal version for Neon is 3.0.6.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#11101
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
I believe Luis sent this info in a prior email (I can't find it - I probably deleted it).
I believe Luis sent this info in a prior email (I can't find it - I probably deleted it).
|
By
Tom Pantelis <tompantelis@...>
·
#11100
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
Thanks for the answer.
If so, on which non-SNAPSHOT versions am I supposed to depend on ? Is 1.2.6 okay ?
Cf previous thread at
Thanks for the answer.
If so, on which non-SNAPSHOT versions am I supposed to depend on ? Is 1.2.6 okay ?
Cf previous thread at
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#11099
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
The mdsal ;project is release integrated (or whatever the official term is) so you're not supposed to depend on snapshot versions.
The mdsal ;project is release integrated (or whatever the official term is) so you're not supposed to depend on snapshot versions.
|
By
Tom Pantelis <tompantelis@...>
·
#11098
·
|
|
Re: [release] SM projects status
Hi all
Luis, I created a TransportPCE stable/neon branch yesterday with a config that was working last week..
But I got a Jenkins build failure because of obsolete poms. It appears that Mdsal binding
Hi all
Luis, I created a TransportPCE stable/neon branch yesterday with a config that was working last week..
But I got a Jenkins build failure because of obsolete poms. It appears that Mdsal binding
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#11097
·
|