|
Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netconf/+/93366 is in, good to go.
Should be in tonight's autorelease.
Manually tested okay, UTs are forthcoming.
Regards,
Robert
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netconf/+/93366 is in, good to go.
Should be in tonight's autorelease.
Manually tested okay, UTs are forthcoming.
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13295
·
|
|
Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
No worries, thanks for the update! We will wait until that NETCONF-736 is resolved..
@Anil Belur please let us know if you are getting these emails
No worries, thanks for the update! We will wait until that NETCONF-736 is resolved..
@Anil Belur please let us know if you are getting these emails
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13294
·
|
|
Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
Eh, sorry, I have one critical patch to NETCONF, will merge it as soon
it verifies.
It is a blocking issue going as far as Sodium SR4, so we definitely want
it in SR1.
Details are at
Eh, sorry, I have one critical patch to NETCONF, will merge it as soon
it verifies.
It is a blocking issue going as far as Sodium SR4, so we definitely want
it in SR1.
Details are at
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13293
·
|
|
TWS session Nov 2, 2020 - NetConf WG Status
Hi folks,
The next week TWS session will be on Nov 2, 2020 at 9 am Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/522266747?pwd=ek1mZHpXY1FzTms5Z1FYRjlZQkZBUT09.
The meeting page
Hi folks,
The next week TWS session will be on Nov 2, 2020 at 9 am Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/522266747?pwd=ek1mZHpXY1FzTms5Z1FYRjlZQkZBUT09.
The meeting page
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13292
·
|
|
Re: NetConf WG status
Manoj,
We have decided to move the topic to next week. I will send out a separate email for the topic.
-Abhijit
Manoj,
We have decided to move the topic to next week. I will send out a separate email for the topic.
-Abhijit
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13291
·
|
|
Re: NetConf WG status
Hi All,
Are we having this meeting today?
Best Regards,
Manoj
Hi All,
Are we having this meeting today?
Best Regards,
Manoj
|
By
manoj chokka
·
#13290
·
|
|
Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
Thanks Robert. @Anil Belur please proceed with Aluminium code freeze as requested
Thanks Robert. @Anil Belur please proceed with Aluminium code freeze as requested
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13289
·
|
|
Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
This activity is now done, the branch is back to normal as of
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/distribution-merge-managed-aluminium/2580/.
Regards,
Robert
This activity is now done, the branch is back to normal as of
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/distribution-merge-managed-aluminium/2580/.
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13288
·
|
|
Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
The patches are being merged now, expect some usual disruption while
they are being merged.
Regards,
Robert
The patches are being merged now, expect some usual disruption while
they are being merged.
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13287
·
|
|
Re: [kernel-dev] [release] [app-dev] Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
Hmm, weird, why is this even needed?
It does look like ConfigProperties.getProperty() requires OSGi runtime
to execute -- which your UT is not.
We typically reserve this to the runtime, where
Hmm, weird, why is this even needed?
It does look like ConfigProperties.getProperty() requires OSGi runtime
to execute -- which your UT is not.
We typically reserve this to the runtime, where
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13286
·
|
|
Re: [release] Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
The MRI update for this release is staged here:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:mri-aluminium-sr1
Multipatch build passed
The MRI update for this release is staged here:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:mri-aluminium-sr1
Multipatch build passed
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13285
·
|
|
Re: [release] [app-dev] Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
FYI, here are the patches to move netvirt project to SM:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:netvirt-sm
We might need to expedite these patches if netvirt project keeps blocking the
FYI, here are the patches to move netvirt project to SM:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/topic:netvirt-sm
We might need to expedite these patches if netvirt project keeps blocking the
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13284
·
|
|
Re: [release] [app-dev] Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
Hi Robert,
I had spent some time today on looking at netvirt patch[0] and fixed a few of errors and still not able to identify the root cause of the below jenkins ERRORs.
Please let us know if
Hi Robert,
I had spent some time today on looking at netvirt patch[0] and fixed a few of errors and still not able to identify the root cause of the below jenkins ERRORs.
Please let us know if
|
By
Karthikeyan
·
#13283
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
I do not have objections to this proposal. Also starting the first elections right away seems better than waiting.
I do not have objections to this proposal. Also starting the first elections right away seems better than waiting.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13282
·
|
|
Re: Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
As a reminder, we will proceed with Aluminium code freeze for SR1... I'll pick a RC then and hopefully we can have the community to help with this release.
Thanks
As a reminder, we will proceed with Aluminium code freeze for SR1... I'll pick a RC then and hopefully we can have the community to help with this release.
Thanks
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13281
·
|
|
Re: TSC Vote on OpenFlow Plugin Committer nomination - Robert Varga
With 6 votes, the vote passes - so Robert is now a committer on the OpenFlow Plugin project. Please follow the standard process (yaml, etc.) to get the committer rights assigned.
With 6 votes, the vote passes - so Robert is now a committer on the OpenFlow Plugin project. Please follow the standard process (yaml, etc.) to get the committer rights assigned.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13280
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
Why not do the following?
Declare we will have 2 elections - one main election immediately and another one 3 months after the main election to give new members a chance to establish
Why not do the following?
Declare we will have 2 elections - one main election immediately and another one 3 months after the main election to give new members a chance to establish
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13279
·
|
|
TSC Vote for OpenDaylight Dev Best Practices Document
Hi TSC members,
Please vote to formalize the developer best practices document
Hi TSC members,
Please vote to formalize the developer best practices document
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13278
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
Fair enough, what if we just start an "open" thread before the official nomination period to see who has intention to self-nominate? although this is not final, it can give us a faster feedback than
Fair enough, what if we just start an "open" thread before the official nomination period to see who has intention to self-nominate? although this is not final, it can give us a faster feedback than
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13277
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
Hi all
Following today TSC call, here is my feedback on the topic.
Today we do not have any certainty on the number of people who are interested to present themselves to joint the TSC,
and moreover on
Hi all
Following today TSC call, here is my feedback on the topic.
Today we do not have any certainty on the number of people who are interested to present themselves to joint the TSC,
and moreover on
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#13276
·
|