|
Re: Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
Ah, yes, it's this one:
https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/release-notes/upgrade-process.html#binding-dtos-enforce-non-null-keys
Thanks for noticing, yeah, the document needs polishing
Ah, yes, it's this one:
https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/release-notes/upgrade-process.html#binding-dtos-enforce-non-null-keys
Thanks for noticing, yeah, the document needs polishing
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13256
·
|
|
Re: Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
Hi Robert,
Do you know if the lispflowmapping failures are related to one of the items on the MD-SAL impacts list on this document?
Hi Robert,
Do you know if the lispflowmapping failures are related to one of the items on the MD-SAL impacts list on this document?
|
By
Lori Jakab
·
#13255
·
|
|
Re: Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
So we have real progress (thanks, Richard) and are down to two projects:
lispflowmapping and netvirt, both of which need attention from regular
committers.
Lispflowmapping is the easier, as it has
So we have real progress (thanks, Richard) and are down to two projects:
lispflowmapping and netvirt, both of which need attention from regular
committers.
Lispflowmapping is the easier, as it has
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13254
·
|
|
Drawing new contributors with simple tasks
Hello everyone,
this is yet another wall of text from me. TL;DR is: we want to give
visibility of easy tasks so that even causal ODL users see where they
can contribute.
If that interests you,
Hello everyone,
this is yet another wall of text from me. TL;DR is: we want to give
visibility of easy tasks so that even causal ODL users see where they
can contribute.
If that interests you,
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13253
·
|
|
Code Freeze Aluminum as part of SR1 release
Hello TSC and all
We are going to code freeze Aluminum for all Managed Projects ( cut and lock release branches ) on Monday October 26th at 10 am pst.
Please remember that we only allow blocker bug
Hello TSC and all
We are going to code freeze Aluminum for all Managed Projects ( cut and lock release branches ) on Monday October 26th at 10 am pst.
Please remember that we only allow blocker bug
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13252
·
|
|
Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Archive inactive repositories
As discussed on today's TSC call, I have created the following archive proposals. Can we get a vote for archiving the projects as per the TSC
As discussed on today's TSC call, I have created the following archive proposals. Can we get a vote for archiving the projects as per the TSC
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13251
·
|
|
Silicon MRI Version Bump happening now
Hello everyone,
this is a heads up that the "Version Bump" step of Silicon release is
happening right now.
The patches to managed projects are staged
Hello everyone,
this is a heads up that the "Version Bump" step of Silicon release is
happening right now.
The patches to managed projects are staged
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13250
·
|
|
Re: Governance Discussion
I have created a draft proposal for TSC Election Process here:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/0BQF
We can discuss this at tonight's TSC meeting.
Best,
Casey Cain
Technical Program Manager /
I have created a draft proposal for TSC Election Process here:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/0BQF
We can discuss this at tonight's TSC meeting.
Best,
Casey Cain
Technical Program Manager /
|
By
Casey Cain
·
#13249
·
|
|
Re: [release] OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
here's another one that focuses specifically on the usecases for the upgrade flag, (some things are slightly dated implementation wise, but the general idea is all
here's another one that focuses specifically on the usecases for the upgrade flag, (some things are slightly dated implementation wise, but the general idea is all
|
By
daya k
·
#13248
·
|
|
Re: [release] OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
hi robert,
not sure of documentation, sorry about that.
we did present this in a ddf, the slides are here -
Upgrade @ DDF 2018
Upgrade @ DDF 2018
Netvirt Upgrade, Oxygen and Beyond Daya Kamath,
hi robert,
not sure of documentation, sorry about that.
we did present this in a ddf, the slides are here -
Upgrade @ DDF 2018
Upgrade @ DDF 2018
Netvirt Upgrade, Oxygen and Beyond Daya Kamath,
|
By
daya k
·
#13247
·
|
|
Re: Rangan to proxy for Tejas<EOM>
Thanks for letting us know.
Thanks for letting us know.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13246
·
|
|
Rangan to proxy for Tejas<EOM>
--
Tejas. S. Nevrekar
Mobile: +91-99805 31339
Bangalore, INDIA.
--
Tejas. S. Nevrekar
Mobile: +91-99805 31339
Bangalore, INDIA.
|
By
Tejas Nevrekar
·
#13245
·
|
|
Re: [release] OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
Hi Robert,
Unfortunately, I couldn't find any User Guide as such for this
Upgade-Flag(@Faseela K, Please point us if there any)
This UpgradeState Flag utility was earlier implemented in GENIUS
Hi Robert,
Unfortunately, I couldn't find any User Guide as such for this
Upgade-Flag(@Faseela K, Please point us if there any)
This UpgradeState Flag utility was earlier implemented in GENIUS
|
By
Chetan
·
#13244
·
|
|
Re: [release] TSC meeting for Oct 15 & Virtual LFN Technical Meeting
We as long as the soon to be self managed projects such as netvirt can work on Aluminium SR1 csit, we can probably release it on time.
We as long as the soon to be self managed projects such as netvirt can work on Aluminium SR1 csit, we can probably release it on time.
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13243
·
|
|
Re: [release] ODL release model
I think this could be done just before a release milestone (e.g. for a RC) but difficult to achieve in a continuous way like in AR today, specially when projects will have freedom for updating their
I think this could be done just before a release milestone (e.g. for a RC) but difficult to achieve in a continuous way like in AR today, specially when projects will have freedom for updating their
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13242
·
|
|
Re: [release] ODL release model
Right, but we already have this defined -- and it is the SimRel
participation rules for all MRI projects -- irrespective of any other
label that may be perceived as relating to a particular project
Right, but we already have this defined -- and it is the SimRel
participation rules for all MRI projects -- irrespective of any other
label that may be perceived as relating to a particular project
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13241
·
|
|
Re: [release] ODL release model
I also do not think TSC can obligate a project to release but I think we have to set some rules for functioning together, for example Platform projects should define a set of release versions for
I also do not think TSC can obligate a project to release but I think we have to set some rules for functioning together, for example Platform projects should define a set of release versions for
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13240
·
|
|
Re: [release] ODL release model
Yeah, except the TSC does not have the mandate for most of these things.
Remember, the TSC gets a say only in two cases:
- project lifecycle events (creation, graduation, etc.)
- project SimRel
Yeah, except the TSC does not have the mandate for most of these things.
Remember, the TSC gets a say only in two cases:
- project lifecycle events (creation, graduation, etc.)
- project SimRel
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13239
·
|
|
ODL release model
Hi all,
I personally found very interesting the ODL release model conversation we held in DDF.
In particular I would like to see if the current project classification and release model: MRI, MSI, SM
Hi all,
I personally found very interesting the ODL release model conversation we held in DDF.
In particular I would like to see if the current project classification and release model: MRI, MSI, SM
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13238
·
|
|
Re: Emergency upgrade of Nexus systems
This work has now been completed
-Andy-
--
Andrew J Grimberg
Manager Release Engineering
The Linux Foundation
This work has now been completed
-Andy-
--
Andrew J Grimberg
Manager Release Engineering
The Linux Foundation
|
By
Andrew Grimberg
·
#13237
·
|