|
TSC Meeting Agenda for October 8, 2020 at 9 am Pacific
Next ODL TSC meeting is October 8, 2020 at 9 am Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/219174946?pwd=aW9uSXl0KzJpcjRXY3l1bWIwdG9KZz09.
Agenda for this meeting is
Next ODL TSC meeting is October 8, 2020 at 9 am Pacific Time. The zoom session for the meeting is: https://zoom.us/j/219174946?pwd=aW9uSXl0KzJpcjRXY3l1bWIwdG9KZz09.
Agenda for this meeting is
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13216
·
|
|
NetConf WG status
[Pardon me if this is a duplicate. I did not see if show up in the archives]
In the meeting on Oct. 26, I will give a status update on where the NetConf WG is in IETF.
We will look at the current
[Pardon me if this is a duplicate. I did not see if show up in the archives]
In the meeting on Oct. 26, I will give a status update on where the NetConf WG is in IETF.
We will look at the current
|
By
Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@...>
·
#13215
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] [release][OpenDaylight TSC] OpenDaylight Aluminum Status
Thank you for the great idea Luis - to mention that Lumina managed to independently test the OpenDaylight Controller in the EANTC lab, could be counted in the Industry Momentum section in my
Thank you for the great idea Luis - to mention that Lumina managed to independently test the OpenDaylight Controller in the EANTC lab, could be counted in the Industry Momentum section in my
|
By
Filip Čúzy <filip.cuzy@...>
·
#13214
·
|
|
Re: NetConf WG status
Mahesh,
I have created the meeting page and added the topic to the agenda: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/oRQF. If you are planning to use any slides or any other material, please upload it under the
Mahesh,
I have created the meeting page and added the topic to the agenda: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/oRQF. If you are planning to use any slides or any other material, please upload it under the
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13213
·
|
|
Re: NetConf WG status
Thanks for the clarification. We can set up the TWS for Oct 26 in that case.
Thanks for the clarification. We can set up the TWS for Oct 26 in that case.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13212
·
|
|
Re: NetConf WG status
Hi Abhijit,
The IETF meeting is later in November.
This update is for the ODL community.
Mahesh Jethanandani
jethanandanm@...
3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304
Hi Abhijit,
The IETF meeting is later in November.
This update is for the ODL community.
Mahesh Jethanandani
jethanandanm@...
3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304
|
By
Mahesh Jethanandani <jethanandanm@...>
·
#13211
·
|
|
Re: ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
I don't remember very well, and I haven't written or tested any of the mappingservice.neutron code. Most likely I will disable it in the build if Neutron will become self-managed.
-Lori
I don't remember very well, and I haven't written or tested any of the mappingservice.neutron code. Most likely I will disable it in the build if Neutron will become self-managed.
-Lori
|
By
Lori Jakab
·
#13210
·
|
|
Re: NetConf WG status
Good to know. Are you planning to give a status update in an IETF meeting on Oct 26 or are you planning to give an update to the ODL community? If it is to the ODL community on Oct 26 we can have a
Good to know. Are you planning to give a status update in an IETF meeting on Oct 26 or are you planning to give an update to the ODL community? If it is to the ODL community on Oct 26 we can have a
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13209
·
|
|
NetConf WG status
In the meeting on Oct. 26, I will give a status update on where the NetConf WG is in IETF.
We will look at the current state of drafts that are WG items, some of the more recent ones that have been
In the meeting on Oct. 26, I will give a status update on where the NetConf WG is in IETF.
We will look at the current state of drafts that are WG items, some of the more recent ones that have been
|
By
Mahesh Jethanandani <jethanandanm@...>
·
#13208
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] [release] Silicon Release plans
I have created project plans for ODL-Guice and ODL-Micro here:
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-294
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-295
Regards,
-Tejas
I have created project plans for ODL-Guice and ODL-Micro here:
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-294
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-295
Regards,
-Tejas
|
By
Tejas Nevrekar
·
#13207
·
|
|
Re: ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
Hello Achuth,
So in lispflowmapping only the model artifact is being used and only by
mappingservice.neutron.
I am not sure what that component does. Neutron already hosts two
hostconfig
Hello Achuth,
So in lispflowmapping only the model artifact is being used and only by
mappingservice.neutron.
I am not sure what that component does. Neutron already hosts two
hostconfig
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13206
·
|
|
Re: [release] OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
Robert,
For SRM : https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/genius/en/stable-aluminium/specs/service-recovery.html
Sorry, this was never moved to ServiceUtils.
Thanks,--
Faseela.K
Cisco,
Robert,
For SRM : https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/genius/en/stable-aluminium/specs/service-recovery.html
Sorry, this was never moved to ServiceUtils.
Thanks,--
Faseela.K
Cisco,
|
By
Faseela K <k.faseela@...>
·
#13205
·
|
|
Intend to make Openflow Plugin Project as self managed project
Hi All,
As discussed in the last TSC meeting ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF), we intend to make Openflow Plugin project to be “self managed” from Silicon release onwards.
If
Hi All,
As discussed in the last TSC meeting ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF), we intend to make Openflow Plugin project to be “self managed” from Silicon release onwards.
If
|
By
d.arunprakash@...
·
#13204
·
|
|
Re: [release] OVSDB : moving project to self-managed for Silicon release cycle.
Hello Chetan,
We might be interested in OVSDB, but unfortunately it depends on
ServiceUtils.
Now there is no thread for ServiceUtils and while the project seems to
be small, there I cannot seem to
Hello Chetan,
We might be interested in OVSDB, but unfortunately it depends on
ServiceUtils.
Now there is no thread for ServiceUtils and while the project seems to
be small, there I cannot seem to
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13203
·
|
|
Re: [release] Silicon Release plans
Hello Daniel,
infrautils is an MRI project now. As I noted in a separate email, it is
ready for integration with release notes
Hello Daniel,
infrautils is an MRI project now. As I noted in a separate email, it is
ready for integration with release notes
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13202
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] [release] ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
As for resources and keeping things uptodate, if memory serves right,
only managed projects can really be expected to get contributions, from
fellow managed projects' committers.
Now that's the
As for resources and keeping things uptodate, if memory serves right,
only managed projects can really be expected to get contributions, from
fellow managed projects' committers.
Now that's the
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13201
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] [release] ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
The way things work in ODL, it is not possible to have a Managed project depending on an SM project.
So if lispflowmapping project wants to continue as Managed project, it should either:
- Remove
The way things work in ODL, it is not possible to have a Managed project depending on an SM project.
So if lispflowmapping project wants to continue as Managed project, it should either:
- Remove
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13200
·
|
|
Re: [release] ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:55 AM Achuth via lists.opendaylight.org <achuth.m=altencalsoftlabs.com@...> wrote:
[...]
Lori &Robert , I believe we have some dependency for certain ODL projects like
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:55 AM Achuth via lists.opendaylight.org <achuth.m=altencalsoftlabs.com@...> wrote:
[...]
Lori &Robert , I believe we have some dependency for certain ODL projects like
|
By
Lori Jakab
·
#13199
·
|
|
ODL Silicon release - Neutron Northbound plans
Hi All,
We don’t see any new requirements/features for Neutron Northbound project in Silicon release and beyond, hence would
recommend moving this project to a self-managed one going
Hi All,
We don’t see any new requirements/features for Neutron Northbound project in Silicon release and beyond, hence would
recommend moving this project to a self-managed one going
|
By
Achuth <achuth.m@...>
·
#13198
·
|
|
Intend to make Genius Project as self managed project
Hi All,
As discussed in the last TSC meeting ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF), we intend to make GENIUS project to be “self managed” from Silicon release onwards.
If anyone in
Hi All,
As discussed in the last TSC meeting ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/x/ZxQF), we intend to make GENIUS project to be “self managed” from Silicon release onwards.
If anyone in
|
By
Hema Gopalakrishnan
·
#13197
·
|