|
Re: [app-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
Hello all
The integration test got resolved but @Anil Belur is still looking for the root cause. In any case, Here is the new CSIT spreadsheet for Aluminium AR
Hello all
The integration test got resolved but @Anil Belur is still looking for the root cause. In any case, Here is the new CSIT spreadsheet for Aluminium AR
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13116
·
|
|
Re: [ODL Discuss] ODL deployment survey
hi ahmed,
some more inputs.
not sure if survey-takers will be willing/allowed to answer with specifics for proprietary controllers, so there should be a choice for 'proprietary', without mentioning
hi ahmed,
some more inputs.
not sure if survey-takers will be willing/allowed to answer with specifics for proprietary controllers, so there should be a choice for 'proprietary', without mentioning
|
By
daya k
·
#13115
·
|
|
Re: [ODL Discuss] ODL deployment survey
hi all,
few comments from me -
typo - Ericsson product is called CSC (Cloud SDN Controller)
what type of sdn do you use for k8s - should be broken up into the foll -
'what type of networking solution
hi all,
few comments from me -
typo - Ericsson product is called CSC (Cloud SDN Controller)
what type of sdn do you use for k8s - should be broken up into the foll -
'what type of networking solution
|
By
daya k
·
#13114
·
|
|
ONAP / ODL Collaboration Meeting Reminder at 10 am Pacific Sept 15
Zoom session: https://zoom.us/j/91654497219
Meeting page:
Zoom session: https://zoom.us/j/91654497219
Meeting page:
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13113
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
OK then ill pick up AR#220.. Aluminium integrations tests are stuck though...
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-aluminium/
I just opened a
OK then ill pick up AR#220.. Aluminium integrations tests are stuck though...
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-aluminium/
I just opened a
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13112
·
|
|
Re: [app-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
oops, I meant 278 not 277. but it's done and has passed.
I forgot that we gave super committer rights by default during code freeze.
Thanks for reminding me :)
JamO
On
oops, I meant 278 not 277. but it's done and has passed.
I forgot that we gave super committer rights by default during code freeze.
Thanks for reminding me :)
JamO
On
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13111
·
|
|
Re: Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
Thanks Jamo and Karthik, Indeed, I'll pick tonight's Aluminium AR ... but this netvirt job/277 was completed yesterday, you meant 279? Also i think that Supercommitters' powers allow you to merge even
Thanks Jamo and Karthik, Indeed, I'll pick tonight's Aluminium AR ... but this netvirt job/277 was completed yesterday, you meant 279? Also i think that Supercommitters' powers allow you to merge even
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13110
·
|
|
Re: Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
Ok Karthikeyan,
I merged it with super committer powers I guess. I did not expect those
to be active. The Aluminium branch should have been locked. @Anil, do
you know why we
Ok Karthikeyan,
I merged it with super committer powers I guess. I did not expect those
to be active. The Aluminium branch should have been locked. @Anil, do
you know why we
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13109
·
|
|
Re: Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
Hi Daniel/Jamo,
Can you please merge the fix[1] into a stable/aluminium branch as i do not have privilege to merge.
[1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netvirt/+/92279
Hi Daniel/Jamo,
Can you please merge the fix[1] into a stable/aluminium branch as i do not have privilege to merge.
[1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netvirt/+/92279
|
By
Karthikeyan
·
#13108
·
|
|
Re: Query on NETCONF and BGP-PCEP from Niral Networks
Sure - makes sense.
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13107
·
|
|
Re: Query on NETCONF and BGP-PCEP from Niral Networks
I also feel TWS would be better for this discussion.
I also feel TWS would be better for this discussion.
|
By
Venkatrangan Govindarajan
·
#13106
·
|
|
Re: Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
I have no objection to waiting for this fix to come in, but it will
require a new autorelease to pass and distribution-test to run
so we can vet the results of CSIT.
Thanks,
I have no objection to waiting for this fix to come in, but it will
require a new autorelease to pass and distribution-test to run
so we can vet the results of CSIT.
Thanks,
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13105
·
|
|
Re: [ODL Discuss] ODL deployment survey
Sounds good.
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13104
·
|
|
Re: Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
Hi Daniel,
Marked the below JIRA with highest priority.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1709
Thanks,
Srinivas
+91-9243478719
Hi Daniel,
Marked the below JIRA with highest priority.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1709
Thanks,
Srinivas
+91-9243478719
|
By
Srinivas <srinivas.rachakonda@...>
·
#13103
·
|
|
Re: Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
Hello Karthik.
Ok we can wait until [1] gets fixed, if TSC doesn't have any objections to delay Aluminium a bit more. Please mark the jira ticket as highest priority so it shows up as a blocker if
Hello Karthik.
Ok we can wait until [1] gets fixed, if TSC doesn't have any objections to delay Aluminium a bit more. Please mark the jira ticket as highest priority so it shows up as a blocker if
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13102
·
|
|
Re: Query on NETCONF and BGP-PCEP from Niral Networks
Hi Abhijit,
Maybe TWS calls are a better choice than TSC, given the nature of the subject.
We have a free flowing discussion without the agenda hanging over us. Just a thought.
BR
Manoj
Hi Abhijit,
Maybe TWS calls are a better choice than TSC, given the nature of the subject.
We have a free flowing discussion without the agenda hanging over us. Just a thought.
BR
Manoj
|
By
manoj chokka
·
#13101
·
|
|
Re: Query on NETCONF and BGP-PCEP from Niral Networks
The TSC meetings are always open to all - so Abhijit C and Niral Networks are welcome and can talk about their use case. It will be definitely good if they are planning to contribute to the two
The TSC meetings are always open to all - so Abhijit C and Niral Networks are welcome and can talk about their use case. It will be definitely good if they are planning to contribute to the two
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13100
·
|
|
Re: [ODL Discuss] ODL deployment survey
Jim,
It is currently a weekend - so I think we should give the TSC at least 3-4 days to review? Maybe Thursday or Friday? If we keep it Friday - we can also discuss it in the TSC meeting on
Jim,
It is currently a weekend - so I think we should give the TSC at least 3-4 days to review? Maybe Thursday or Friday? If we keep it Friday - we can also discuss it in the TSC meeting on
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13099
·
|
|
Re: [ODL Discuss] ODL deployment survey
Hi Ahmed,
I see some of the questions also apply to non DC use cases so maybe we can structure the questions as follows:
Do you use SDN?
If No, what is the reason for not adopting SDN? (add
Hi Ahmed,
I see some of the questions also apply to non DC use cases so maybe we can structure the questions as follows:
Do you use SDN?
If No, what is the reason for not adopting SDN? (add
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13098
·
|
|
Re: Aluminium formal release .. CSIT check
Hi Daniel,
As per the srinivas input(Based on the CSIT Job results) NAT use cases are not working due to the exception[0]. It would be good if we include the fix[1] also into the Aluminium release
Hi Daniel,
As per the srinivas input(Based on the CSIT Job results) NAT use cases are not working due to the exception[0]. It would be good if we include the fix[1] also into the Aluminium release
|
By
Karthikeyan
·
#13097
·
|