Hi, It’s known that LFN selected OPNFV as first candidate because it was (falsy?) considered as the simplest LFN project. And it’s fully driven by cost savings. I quickly highlighted lots of

Greetings folks, Please see the following about changes coming to LF accounts. ******* On August 26 we will be making some cosmetic changes to the Linux Foundation ID login page.  Following

There's an additional issue with that. In the Gerrit workflow you amend your change, effectively creating a brand new commit object (different commit sha) which _replaces_ the previous patch in your

@Cédric, OPNFV is mention in this thread ... Olivier Le 24/08/2020 à 23:07, Andrew Grimberg a écrit : -- Olivier Dugeon

Ah, and related, how would autorelease/maven-stage jobs' Sigul signing work? Regards, Robert

So far so good. Okay, so this is where LF(N) or ODL budgeting gets involved. The plugin needs to be improved to mirror any comments back to the PR. IIRC at least GH has APIs to do this. Same as

On the ODL side of things, moving the regular build jobs will be the "easy" part as it's migrating some maven shell scripts to the new CI system. CSIT on the other hand would be the difficult part. I

Right-o. We are in a completely different position: we have *hundreds* if not *thousands* of jobs to migrate. Granted, majority of those are duds, but my guesstimate is we are looking at ~200 jobs

We are doing some leg work on this. We've been getting semi-deep in the weeds the following of late: GitHub + Azure Pipelines GitHub + Jenkins (we already support several projects in this

I can weigh in a little bit on this. I'm not going to go in depth here, but I can definitely answer a few of the questions raised. I migration to GitLab would basically mean throwing the Jenkins

See inline. (Include's Robert's fixes) Either way would require modifying JJB to support the new SCM system GitLab and the trigger mechanism would be quite a bit different than what we have with

Sorry, thinko fixes: s/contributors/contributions/ s/ODL mirror/ODL project/ Regards, Robert

Hello, in today's (lightly advertised) TWS call, Casey raised the question of migrating our infrastructure to GitLab in a bid to attract more contributions. Unfortunately a straight-up migration

Awesome work :) Thanks, Robert

Is there a recording of this (and the previous) meeting? I cannot find it in http://r.lfnetworking.org/?prefix=lfn-zoom/OpenDaylight/TSC/ Thanks, Robert

Hello All, OpenDaylight Sodium SR4 version bump is complete while the staging repository is still being promoted. Note: 'stable/sodium' branch is locked. Pending activities for the release: 1. Release

-- Tejas. S. Nevrekar Mobile: +91-99805 31339 Bangalore, INDIA.

Thanks JamO. I have adjusted the SR4 checklist https://wiki.opendaylight.org/display/ODL/Sodium+SR4+Release+Checklist So the TSC vote is

All of the CSIT results have been marked OKAY or IGNORE. I think we can move forward with the SR4 release now. The three jobs that I had marked as blocker (2 netconf and 1

Sure. Thanks for letting us know.