I cannot attend on those dates (as indicated earlier).

I will be able to attend. -vijoy Phil Robb ---05/07/2013 02:31:41 PM---Hello TSC: As you know we have been working on the dates for the next Hackfest. While From: Phil Robb <probb@...> To: "tsc@..."

Thnx Phil. I can attend. --dmm

Hello TSC: As you know we have been working on the dates for the next Hackfest. While we were quite close on one upcoming date, we have had multiple requests to schedule the next hackfest later. The

Can you restate what your proposal is and how it fits into the framework we just heard from Colin and David (if indeed it does)? IMO this would be very helpful for the community and would help us

https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSC:Main#Meeting_Agenda Thnx, --dmm

* Thomas Nadeau (tnadeau@...) wrote: Sorry, that's just me not being able to read. I read "no-vote" as a vote for "no" rather than not voting. thanks, -chris

<rob.sherwood@...> wrote: Actually both your proposal and whether or not what Colin/David are suggesting is the same thing as you have proposed are items for discussion. --dmm

OK -- just so it's said, I consider Colin and Dave's proposal to be simply a more well thought out and detailed version of my proposal that I pitched on

<rob.sherwood@...> wrote: Understand that, was wondering if there were other proposals that were equally details --dmm

Colin and Dave are going to pitch their merged plan in about 40 minutes. I'm still trying to understand the details but it seems to have some strong points. - Rob .

All, Since I have asked the "controller" and "net-virt-platform" teams to look at a resolution proposal, I'm looking for a progress report (if any). Thnx, --dmm

Hello TSC Members: Please indicate below what times work for you for an added weekly TSC meeting. You can put an "X", a "Y", or "Yes".. whatever you prefer under *ALL* of the times that would work

No, not unless you need me to take it. --dmm

First off, Dave, do you have the editing pen now for this? Right, no vote == abstain. You need some default state. It seems the most obvious route is no vote == abstain to

* Thomas Nadeau (tnadeau@...) wrote: Come to think of it, we don't actually have "the development" list. We have "the discuss" list, or "the TSC" list. Capturing the spirit here, it'd be

* David Meyer (dmm@...) wrote: That's boilerplate from the original. OpenStack has a TC (Technical Committee), which is built of PTLs (Project Technical Leads) and 5 community voted

Thanks Tom. A few questions/comments in line. --dmm

I have tried to capture the details of our discussion last week. Please comment on the proposal below so that we can amend the process as soon as possible. --Tom Email-based or Proxy-based

Thanks Chris. --dmm