|
Re: Increasing TSC meetings to twice per week
2:00pm PDT on Tuesdays works for me generally, but I have a conflict on 5/7 till 2:30p.
Best,
abhishek
2:00pm PDT on Tuesdays works for me generally, but I have a conflict on 5/7 till 2:30p.
Best,
abhishek
|
By
Abhishek Chauhan
·
#72
·
|
|
Re: Increasing TSC meetings to twice per week
Hi Tom:
Thanks for your quick response.
Some of the attendees have a conflict at 1:30pm PDT on Tuesdays. Would 2pm PDT on Tuesdays work?
We will start after next week (on May 7th). Does 2:00pm PDT
Hi Tom:
Thanks for your quick response.
Some of the attendees have a conflict at 1:30pm PDT on Tuesdays. Would 2pm PDT on Tuesdays work?
We will start after next week (on May 7th). Does 2:00pm PDT
|
By
Phil Robb
·
#71
·
|
|
Re: Increasing TSC meetings to twice per week
From: Phil Robb <probb@...>
Date: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:15 PM
To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Increasing TSC meetings to twice per week
Can we make it at 1:30?
If we keep it
From: Phil Robb <probb@...>
Date: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:15 PM
To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Increasing TSC meetings to twice per week
Can we make it at 1:30?
If we keep it
|
By
Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@...>
·
#70
·
|
|
Increasing TSC meetings to twice per week
Hello OpenDaylight TSC Members:
As Dave mentioned in a previous mail, the TSC is not making as much progress as is needed during the weekly calls that are occurring. While the discussions and
Hello OpenDaylight TSC Members:
As Dave mentioned in a previous mail, the TSC is not making as much progress as is needed during the weekly calls that are occurring. While the discussions and
|
By
Phil Robb
·
#69
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
I guess any motions that are raised during the call, in cases where %100
of members are not there, must then also be sent out via email (with an
expiration date to absentee votes). Although we should
I guess any motions that are raised during the call, in cases where %100
of members are not there, must then also be sent out via email (with an
expiration date to absentee votes). Although we should
|
By
Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@...>
·
#68
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
Great suggestions. --dmm
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#67
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
* David Meyer (dmm@...) wrote:
<snip>
Here are a couple concrete steps we could follow to encourage more
email use:
1) require that all agenda items are added to the wiki w/in Xhrs/days
of the
* David Meyer (dmm@...) wrote:
<snip>
Here are a couple concrete steps we could follow to encourage more
email use:
1) require that all agenda items are added to the wiki w/in Xhrs/days
of the
|
By
Chris Wright <chrisw@...>
·
#66
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
* Rob Sherwood (rob.sherwood@...) wrote:
Yes
* Rob Sherwood (rob.sherwood@...) wrote:
Yes
|
By
Chris Wright <chrisw@...>
·
#65
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
Not a problem. --dmm
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#64
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
For clarity, you might also want to add that comments 4 through 6 are in reference to the "Scope" portion of the document.
Phil.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@...>
For clarity, you might also want to add that comments 4 through 6 are in reference to the "Scope" portion of the document.
Phil.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@...>
|
By
Phil Robb
·
#63
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
The list definitely looks accurate - thanks Ed.
One thing: I'm sure that Dave, Benson, Chris and others will provide the necessary context around these changes, but I can imagine if you see these
The list definitely looks accurate - thanks Ed.
One thing: I'm sure that Dave, Benson, Chris and others will provide the necessary context around these changes, but I can imagine if you see these
|
By
Rob Sherwood
·
#62
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
Thanks Ed. This looks to accurately capture what we decided. Others: If you have corrections/discussion points/etc please get those to the list by COB and I will synthesize a package for the Board
Thanks Ed. This looks to accurately capture what we decided. Others: If you have corrections/discussion points/etc please get those to the list by COB and I will synthesize a package for the Board
|
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#61
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
All, thanks for the thoughts.
A few comments: First, I don't want to see any TSC member disenfranchised due to travel, overbooking, etc. We're all busy. In addition,, according to Robert's Rules of
All, thanks for the thoughts.
A few comments: First, I don't want to see any TSC member disenfranchised due to travel, overbooking, etc. We're all busy. In addition,, according to Robert's Rules of
|
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#59
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
Hi, Rob.
Just my opinion as an observer of the TSC:
First, if the TSC ever needs such a mechanism, I'd suggest a web poll. It's much easier than asking somebody to
Hi, Rob.
Just my opinion as an observer of the TSC:
First, if the TSC ever needs such a mechanism, I'd suggest a web poll. It's much easier than asking somebody to
|
By
Benson Schliesser <bensons@...>
·
#58
·
|
|
TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
Please find enumerated below the comments of the TSC on the Boards TSC-policies doc. In addition, please find attached
a redline of that doc.
This is an output of the 2013-04-25 TSC meeting. Please
Please find enumerated below the comments of the TSC on the Boards TSC-policies doc. In addition, please find attached
a redline of that doc.
This is an output of the 2013-04-25 TSC meeting. Please
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#60
·
|
|
Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
I don't want to distract the call with this, but I think it's an important topic that we can hopefully take up on the mailing list: we probably should create a mechanism for allowing TSC members to
I don't want to distract the call with this, but I think it's an important topic that we can hopefully take up on the mailing list: we probably should create a mechanism for allowing TSC members to
|
By
Rob Sherwood
·
#57
·
|
|
Webex for today's call (now)
Is here:
https://linuxfoundation.webex.com/linuxfoundation/onstage/g.php?d=663405259&t=a
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M)
Is here:
https://linuxfoundation.webex.com/linuxfoundation/onstage/g.php?d=663405259&t=a
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M)
|
By
Phil Robb
·
#56
·
|
|
Re: Possible board/tsc communication breakdown
Actually... this suggests a possible suggestion to the board that they email such taskings to the TSC to the TSC list ccing whatever list the board has so everyone is on page :)
Ed
On Apr 25, 2013, at
Actually... this suggests a possible suggestion to the board that they email such taskings to the TSC to the TSC list ccing whatever list the board has so everyone is on page :)
Ed
On Apr 25, 2013, at
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#55
·
|
|
Re: Possible board/tsc communication breakdown
Sure :-)
Just wanting everything (including communications such as these) to be in the open. In addition, I want to establish that *anyone* can open such a thread on tsc@lists.
--dmm
Sure :-)
Just wanting everything (including communications such as these) to be in the open. In addition, I want to establish that *anyone* can open such a thread on tsc@lists.
--dmm
|
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#54
·
|
|
Re: Possible board/tsc communication breakdown
I was simply seeking clarification as you sit on both the TSC and board meetings and could thus speak directly :)
Everything is new and moving fast :)
Ed
On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:33 AM, "David Meyer"
I was simply seeking clarification as you sit on both the TSC and board meetings and could thus speak directly :)
Everything is new and moving fast :)
Ed
On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:33 AM, "David Meyer"
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#53
·
|