|
Increasing TSC meetings to twice per week
Hello OpenDaylight TSC Members:
As Dave mentioned in a previous mail, the TSC is not making as much progress as is needed during the weekly calls that are occurring. While the discussions and
Hello OpenDaylight TSC Members:
As Dave mentioned in a previous mail, the TSC is not making as much progress as is needed during the weekly calls that are occurring. While the discussions and
|
By
Phil Robb
·
#69
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
I guess any motions that are raised during the call, in cases where %100
of members are not there, must then also be sent out via email (with an
expiration date to absentee votes). Although we should
I guess any motions that are raised during the call, in cases where %100
of members are not there, must then also be sent out via email (with an
expiration date to absentee votes). Although we should
|
By
Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@...>
·
#68
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
Great suggestions. --dmm
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#67
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
* David Meyer (dmm@...) wrote:
<snip>
Here are a couple concrete steps we could follow to encourage more
email use:
1) require that all agenda items are added to the wiki w/in Xhrs/days
of the
* David Meyer (dmm@...) wrote:
<snip>
Here are a couple concrete steps we could follow to encourage more
email use:
1) require that all agenda items are added to the wiki w/in Xhrs/days
of the
|
By
Chris Wright <chrisw@...>
·
#66
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
* Rob Sherwood (rob.sherwood@...) wrote:
Yes
* Rob Sherwood (rob.sherwood@...) wrote:
Yes
|
By
Chris Wright <chrisw@...>
·
#65
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
Not a problem. --dmm
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#64
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
For clarity, you might also want to add that comments 4 through 6 are in reference to the "Scope" portion of the document.
Phil.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@...>
For clarity, you might also want to add that comments 4 through 6 are in reference to the "Scope" portion of the document.
Phil.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@...>
|
By
Phil Robb
·
#63
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
The list definitely looks accurate - thanks Ed.
One thing: I'm sure that Dave, Benson, Chris and others will provide the necessary context around these changes, but I can imagine if you see these
The list definitely looks accurate - thanks Ed.
One thing: I'm sure that Dave, Benson, Chris and others will provide the necessary context around these changes, but I can imagine if you see these
|
By
Rob Sherwood
·
#62
·
|
|
Re: TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
Thanks Ed. This looks to accurately capture what we decided. Others: If you have corrections/discussion points/etc please get those to the list by COB and I will synthesize a package for the Board
Thanks Ed. This looks to accurately capture what we decided. Others: If you have corrections/discussion points/etc please get those to the list by COB and I will synthesize a package for the Board
|
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#61
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
All, thanks for the thoughts.
A few comments: First, I don't want to see any TSC member disenfranchised due to travel, overbooking, etc. We're all busy. In addition,, according to Robert's Rules of
All, thanks for the thoughts.
A few comments: First, I don't want to see any TSC member disenfranchised due to travel, overbooking, etc. We're all busy. In addition,, according to Robert's Rules of
|
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#59
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
Hi, Rob.
Just my opinion as an observer of the TSC:
First, if the TSC ever needs such a mechanism, I'd suggest a web poll. It's much easier than asking somebody to
Hi, Rob.
Just my opinion as an observer of the TSC:
First, if the TSC ever needs such a mechanism, I'd suggest a web poll. It's much easier than asking somebody to
|
By
Benson Schliesser <bensons@...>
·
#58
·
|
|
TSC Comments to the Board on TSC_Policy.doc
Please find enumerated below the comments of the TSC on the Boards TSC-policies doc. In addition, please find attached
a redline of that doc.
This is an output of the 2013-04-25 TSC meeting. Please
Please find enumerated below the comments of the TSC on the Boards TSC-policies doc. In addition, please find attached
a redline of that doc.
This is an output of the 2013-04-25 TSC meeting. Please
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#60
·
|
|
Asynchronous voting mechanisms for TSC
I don't want to distract the call with this, but I think it's an important topic that we can hopefully take up on the mailing list: we probably should create a mechanism for allowing TSC members to
I don't want to distract the call with this, but I think it's an important topic that we can hopefully take up on the mailing list: we probably should create a mechanism for allowing TSC members to
|
By
Rob Sherwood
·
#57
·
|
|
Webex for today's call (now)
Is here:
https://linuxfoundation.webex.com/linuxfoundation/onstage/g.php?d=663405259&t=a
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M)
Is here:
https://linuxfoundation.webex.com/linuxfoundation/onstage/g.php?d=663405259&t=a
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M)
|
By
Phil Robb
·
#56
·
|
|
Re: Possible board/tsc communication breakdown
Actually... this suggests a possible suggestion to the board that they email such taskings to the TSC to the TSC list ccing whatever list the board has so everyone is on page :)
Ed
On Apr 25, 2013, at
Actually... this suggests a possible suggestion to the board that they email such taskings to the TSC to the TSC list ccing whatever list the board has so everyone is on page :)
Ed
On Apr 25, 2013, at
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#55
·
|
|
Re: Possible board/tsc communication breakdown
Sure :-)
Just wanting everything (including communications such as these) to be in the open. In addition, I want to establish that *anyone* can open such a thread on tsc@lists.
--dmm
Sure :-)
Just wanting everything (including communications such as these) to be in the open. In addition, I want to establish that *anyone* can open such a thread on tsc@lists.
--dmm
|
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#54
·
|
|
Re: Possible board/tsc communication breakdown
I was simply seeking clarification as you sit on both the TSC and board meetings and could thus speak directly :)
Everything is new and moving fast :)
Ed
On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:33 AM, "David Meyer"
I was simply seeking clarification as you sit on both the TSC and board meetings and could thus speak directly :)
Everything is new and moving fast :)
Ed
On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:33 AM, "David Meyer"
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#53
·
|
|
Re: Feedback on singularity text for TSC Policy document
Rob,
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#52
·
|
|
Re: Feedback on singularity text for TSC Policy document
Also, IIRC, Chris and Ed were going to have feedback on the 2nd section of the document. Is it possible to get example text or general thoughts about it posted before the call so we can try to have a
Also, IIRC, Chris and Ed were going to have feedback on the 2nd section of the document. Is it possible to get example text or general thoughts about it posted before the call so we can try to have a
|
By
Rob Sherwood
·
#51
·
|
|
Re: Possible board/tsc communication breakdown
BTW, in re-reading 2) I'll just note that I consider Inder to speak authoritatively for the Board. If what you are suggesting that he does not or that there is some other internal operational problem
BTW, in re-reading 2) I'll just note that I consider Inder to speak authoritatively for the Board. If what you are suggesting that he does not or that there is some other internal operational problem
|
By
David Meyer <dmm@...>
·
#50
·
|