|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Phosphorus SR3 release status
OK, here it is : https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/15.3.0/ Thanks everyone for this new release :) BR/Luis
OK, here it is : https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/15.3.0/ Thanks everyone for this new release :) BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14187
·
|
|
TSC Meeting for June 30, 2022 at 9 am Pacific
If you are talking about moving out from gerrit to github, I am totally for it. BTW I am not sure you were last week TSC meeting where I explained the several issues and hurdles the interns of my ment
If you are talking about moving out from gerrit to github, I am totally for it. BTW I am not sure you were last week TSC meeting where I explained the several issues and hurdles the interns of my ment
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14185
·
|
|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Sulfur release status
Here it is : https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/16.0.0/ Thanks to everyone that contributed to this release :) BR/Luis
Here it is : https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/16.0.0/ Thanks to everyone that contributed to this release :) BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14164
·
|
|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Sulfur release status
Also, it looks like distribution jobs missed stable/sulfur update, I will need this merged in order to produce a release: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/101005 BR/Luis
Also, it looks like distribution jobs missed stable/sulfur update, I will need this merged in order to produce a release: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/101005 BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14158
·
|
|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Sulfur release status
TPCE can integrate in the ODL distribution any time they wish to do so. I am curious: are all these issues due to changes in TPCE, changes in Kernel or both? BR/Luis
TPCE can integrate in the ODL distribution any time they wish to do so. I am curious: are all these issues due to changes in TPCE, changes in Kernel or both? BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14157
·
|
|
Switching default build node to centos8-builder-4c-4g
LGTM, any change for updating current infra is +1 for me :)
LGTM, any change for updating current infra is +1 for me :)
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14139
·
|
|
ODL modernization
OK, then maybe it will help some marketing and/or white paper if anyone knows about these use cases in more detail :) Fair enough, I did not explained well myself, Java nano-service is still required
OK, then maybe it will help some marketing and/or white paper if anyone knows about these use cases in more detail :) Fair enough, I did not explained well myself, Java nano-service is still required
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14133
·
|
|
ODL modernization
Hi TSC ex-colleagues, As I promised, here is a list of topics for ODL modernization. This is all that came to my mind now but it could be more, the goal here is really to trigger some brainstorm and d
Hi TSC ex-colleagues, As I promised, here is a list of topics for ODL modernization. This is all that came to my mind now but it could be more, the goal here is really to trigger some brainstorm and d
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14125
·
|
|
int/test committer promotion
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/99972/1/INFO.yaml btw I am sending a separated mail to cleanup int/test committer list. BR/Luis
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/99972/1/INFO.yaml btw I am sending a separated mail to cleanup int/test committer list. BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14084
·
|
|
[E] Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] int/test committer promotion
Congratulations both int/test new committers. (I could not make the TSC call yesterday due to a last minute issue). BR/Luis
Congratulations both int/test new committers. (I could not make the TSC call yesterday due to a last minute issue). BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14083
·
|
|
int/test committer promotion
Hi TSC colleagues, Can we pass a vote today to have Sangwook and Tomas (in cc) promoted to int/test committers? As you can see below, they both have sufficient contribution and a majority (and the tot
Hi TSC colleagues, Can we pass a vote today to have Sangwook and Tomas (in cc) promoted to int/test committers? As you can see below, they both have sufficient contribution and a majority (and the tot
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14078
·
|
|
[integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Phosphorus SR2
OK, the distribution has been released here: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/15.2.0/ BR/Luis
OK, the distribution has been released here: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/15.2.0/ BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14072
·
|
|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon SR4 release status
OK, Silicon SR4 distribution is released here: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/14.4.0 BR/Luis
OK, Silicon SR4 distribution is released here: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/14.4.0 BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14055
·
|
|
[documentation] RTD Job - automation rule to activate branch/tag
Looks like jsonrpc is missing phosphorus brach too: https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/jsonrpc/en/latest/
Looks like jsonrpc is missing phosphorus brach too: https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/jsonrpc/en/latest/
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14052
·
|
|
[documentation] RTD Job - automation rule to activate branch/tag
Yeah, I do not see daexim stable/phosphorus docs for example: https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/daexim/en/latest/, so it did not work, at least fully :( Can you please make sure at least these MS
Yeah, I do not see daexim stable/phosphorus docs for example: https://docs.opendaylight.org/projects/daexim/en/latest/, so it did not work, at least fully :( Can you please make sure at least these MS
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14037
·
|
|
[documentation] RTD Job - automation rule to activate branch/tag
Hi Anil, Is there anyone in ODL with admin permissions on all the RTD projects? If so, can this person generate a token and run this script to activate the stable-phosphorus branch on all the projects
Hi Anil, Is there anyone in ODL with admin permissions on all the RTD projects? If so, can this person generate a token and run this script to activate the stable-phosphorus branch on all the projects
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14033
·
|
|
[E] Re: Next TSC meeting
Happy holidays everyone πΎπ₯π₯³
Happy holidays everyone πΎπ₯π₯³
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14015
·
|
|
[integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Phosphorus SR1
OK, I just released the distribution with the old job name, we can fix the name for the next release: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integrat
OK, I just released the distribution with the old job name, we can fix the name for the next release: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integrat
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14002
·
|
|
[integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Phosphorus SR1
I have just realized there is a typo in the distribution stage job: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/98797 If anyone can review & merge, I can release the distribution tomorrow m
I have just realized there is a typo in the distribution stage job: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/98797 If anyone can review & merge, I can release the distribution tomorrow m
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #14001
·
|
|
[E] Re: [release] Phosphorus SR1 RC
BTW, even when this is a bug fix, the moment it changes the REST API in a non backwards compatible way, I think it needs some talk. As a minimum whether this change is reasonable for a Service Release
BTW, even when this is a bug fix, the moment it changes the REST API in a non backwards compatible way, I think it needs some talk. As a minimum whether this change is reasonable for a Service Release
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13976
·
|