On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Madhu Venugopal (vmadhu)
<vmadhu@...> wrote:

+1. Yes. This evolved in the IRC and dlux is a clever wordplay on UX, DayLight and Deluxe.

Too clever, IMO, and has the prospect to confuse everyone.

--dmm

-Madhu

On Sep 27, 2013, at 5:50 PM, "Chris Wright" <chrisw@...> wrote:

* Bhushan Kanekar (bkanekar) (bkanekar@...) wrote:

Shouldn't it be Open Daylight UX then? The consortium is called open daylight right?

that's actually where it started...but odlux didn't sound as good as just dlux

_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

--

+1. Yes. This evolved in the IRC and dlux is a clever wordplay on UX, DayLight and Deluxe.

-Madhu

* Bhushan Kanekar (bkanekar) (bkanekar@...) wrote:

Shouldn't it be Open Daylight UX then? The consortium is called open daylight right?

that's actually where it started...but odlux didn't sound as good as just dlux

Shouldn't it be Open Daylight UX then? The consortium is called open daylight right?

Thanks,

Bhushan

+1


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Kim (andrekim)
<andrekim@...> wrote:

+1 to dlux

Can be pronounced as "deluxe"

On 9/27/13 6:09 PM, "Madhu Venugopal (vmadhu)" <vmadhu@...> wrote:

dlux.

We like that. :-)

-Madhu

On 9/27/13 4:07 PM, "Chris Wright" <chrisw@...> wrote:

* Madhu Venugopal (vmadhu) (vmadhu@...) wrote:

TSC members,

Andy has been his usual best in getting the project setup up and
running.
But, based on the creation review feedback (which we agree after
learning
the meaning of it),
We certainly don't want a "old man" name to the project :-).

And based on the previous concerns on trademark conflicts on the name,
Andrew Kim has consolidated
all the proposed names under : http://pastebin.com/jbDvghWh (in the
order
of preference).

Unusual turn of events for non project member to recommend a name...

but perhaps:

dlUX (Daylight UX)

?

+1 to dlux

Can be pronounced as "deluxe"

dlux.

We like that. :-)

-Madhu

* Madhu Venugopal (vmadhu) (vmadhu@...) wrote:

TSC members,

Andy has been his usual best in getting the project setup up and running.
But, based on the creation review feedback (which we agree after learning
the meaning of it),
We certainly don't want a "old man" name to the project :-).

And based on the previous concerns on trademark conflicts on the name,
Andrew Kim has consolidated
all the proposed names under : http://pastebin.com/jbDvghWh (in the order
of preference).

Unusual turn of events for non project member to recommend a name...

but perhaps:

dlUX (Daylight UX)

?

TSC members,

Andy has been his usual best in getting the project setup up and running.
But, based on the creation review feedback (which we agree after learning
the meaning of it),
We certainly don't want a "old man" name to the project :-).

And based on the previous concerns on trademark conflicts on the name,
Andrew Kim has consolidated
all the proposed names under : http://pastebin.com/jbDvghWh (in the order
of preference).

We will appreciate if Phil can help with clearing one of the names from
this list and TSC can give
a nod (I hope a TSC vote is not needed). This will enable Andy to help us
with the name change.

Thanks,
Madhu

On 9/26/13 9:50 PM, "Andrew Grimberg" <agrimberg@...>
wrote:

It is somewhat a bit late yes. The TSC ratified your project with the
name vieux, I sort of need to stick with it unless they say otherwise.
Besides, I've built out everything on that name! ;)

Gerrit doesn't let me just delete repositories once they're created, I
can make them hidden and inaccessible but not easily delete them once
created.

That being said, you get the TSC to say use a different name and I'll
change things, simple as that. Mind you, the repo isn't currently
publicly accessible yet, I don't open them to the public till I'm asked
to by the committer team.

-Andy-

On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 03:31 +0000, Madhu Venugopal (vmadhu) wrote:

Hi Andy,

There were some concerns on the name vieux :-)
And we will put this up for a vote in IRC tomorrow.
Is it too late for that ?

-Madhu

On 9/26/13 3:01 PM, "Andrew Grimberg" <agrimberg@...>
wrote:

Greetings folks,

This little note is to let you know that the integration repository,
mailman lists & base bugzilla project is in place.

You all are listed as the committer team which is why you're getting
this note.

I will be getting your Jenkins silo stood up today (though it might
honestly be as late as tomorrow).

-Andy-

--
Andrew J Grimberg
Systems Administrator
The Linux Foundation

--
Andrew J Grimberg
Systems Administrator
The Linux Foundation