+1

There are quite a few things to iron out before we hold this, as you state.

-vijoy



David Meyer ---03/31/2014 12:27:27 PM---As many of you may know, the TSC had decided (along with the ODP community) that we would add two TS

From: David Meyer <dmm@...>
To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
Cc: "discuss@..." <discuss@...>
Date: 03/31/2014 12:27 PM
Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Regarding the impending TSC at large member election
Sent by: tsc-bounces@...

+1 means postpone the vote
-1 means continue with the plan to elect two at large TSC members

As many of you may know, the TSC had decided (along with the ODP
community) that we would add two TSC at large members during this
election cycle. However, a week I raised concerns with the impending
at large elections and outlined several "unforeseen consequences" of
the structure and wording of the current TSC charter (see [0]). While
I didn't provide concrete steps forward in that email, in
conversations with many of you it became clear that many of you would
like to postpone the elections until the problems with the TSC charter
were ironed out.

To that end, I want to take an up/down vote here on whether postpone
the elections or to continue with the elections as we originally
thought we would. To make this simple:

+1 means postpone the vote
-1 means continue with the plan to elect two at large TSC members

Finally, please vote in a timely fashion and note that this vote is
for TSC members.

Thanks,

--dmm

[0] https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2014-March/000946.html