On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:50 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:

On 20/08/2022 01:10, Robert Varga wrote:
> On 18/08/2022 16:36, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>> Hello TSC and all... As mentioned in the other email thread, we are
>> going to skip the code freeze from now on and move forward to pick a
>> RC for Sulfur SR2. At this point, it doesn't look like we are ready to
>> pick an RC based of what I'm seeing here but @Robert Varga
>> <mailto:nite@...> please correct me if I'm wrong
>>
>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/
>> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
>>
>
> Actually MRI projects have not been update since May due to all the
> churn required to get 2022.09 back on regular release schedule.
>
> The critical issue here is
> https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436, which has been
> resolved this week, so I am spinning releases out -- BUT!
>
> This means catching up with backports across the board, so this might
> take up to a week (or more (*)).

This is all done now.

Great, thanks! I'll pick a Sulfur SR2 RC on monday 8/29

 

Regards,
Robert

On Sep 7, 2022, at 12:50 AM, Anil Shashikumar Belur <abelur@...> wrote:

Forgot to include the CR: 

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102298

On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:50 PM Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...> wrote:

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:50 PM Anil Shashikumar Belur <abelur@...> wrote:

Hi Robert, Daniel: 

The issue is not with the baseline image, rather due to the absence of the openstack tools/libs set in the $PATH program

since the system python packages are not up-to-date with the PyPi dependencies, we'll have had to move with

pyenv (much more efficient) while dealing with recent version{s} of Python 3.X. 

This is already resolved in global-jjb v0.80.2, however, there is a residual set of code scattered around

in the integration jobs/ (and long scripts) which is generally maintained by Luis and integration folks (Luis), 

which also needs an update.

Ex: 

https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blob/master/jjb/integration/integration-deploy-openstack-run-test.sh 

I've updated some parts of the integration scripts, would be good to test these on the sandbox.

CC: Liuis

Thanks @Anil Belur  let me cc @Luis Gomez  as well

 

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102298

- ab

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:41 PM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:

On 31/08/2022 03:04, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
> Robert and all,
>
> it looks like we are still having some issues in Sulfur integration
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
>
>
> Please let me know if it is ok to pick a RC despite these bgpcep and ofp
> issues

There seems to be a problem with the baseline image -- tests are failing
across the board and across releases due to 'openstack' not being installed.

Not sure how to fix this.

Bye,
Robert

>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:41 AM Daniel de la Rosa via
> lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org>
> <ddelarosa0707=gmail.com@...
> <mailto:gmail.com@...>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:50 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>     <mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
>
>         On 20/08/2022 01:10, Robert Varga wrote:
>          > On 18/08/2022 16:36, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >> Hello TSC and all... As mentioned in the other email thread,
>         we are
>          >> going to skip the code freeze from now on and move forward
>         to pick a
>          >> RC for Sulfur SR2. At this point, it doesn't look like we
>         are ready to
>          >> pick an RC based of what I'm seeing here but @Robert Varga
>          >> <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>> please correct me if
>         I'm wrong
>          >>
>          >>
>         https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
>          >>
>         <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>>
>          >>
>          >
>          > Actually MRI projects have not been update since May due to
>         all the
>          > churn required to get 2022.09 back on regular release schedule.
>          >
>          > The critical issue here is
>          > https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436
>         <https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436>, which has
>         been
>          > resolved this week, so I am spinning releases out -- BUT!
>          >
>          > This means catching up with backports across the board, so
>         this might
>          > take up to a week (or more (*)).
>
>         This is all done now.
>
>
>     Great, thanks! I'll pick a Sulfur SR2 RC on monday 8/29
>
>
>
>         Regards,
>         Robert
>
>

On Sep 7, 2022, at 5:43 PM, Luis Gomez via lists.opendaylight.org <ecelgp=gmail.com@...> wrote:

I do not think any of the integration scripts modified in this CR is used anymore. Let me just push a CSIT clean patch and then you can rebase and continue with your change.

BR/Luis

On Sep 7, 2022, at 12:50 AM, Anil Shashikumar Belur <abelur@...> wrote:

Forgot to include the CR: 

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102298

On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:50 PM Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...> wrote:

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:50 PM Anil Shashikumar Belur <abelur@...> wrote:

Hi Robert, Daniel: 

The issue is not with the baseline image, rather due to the absence of the openstack tools/libs set in the $PATH program

since the system python packages are not up-to-date with the PyPi dependencies, we'll have had to move with

pyenv (much more efficient) while dealing with recent version{s} of Python 3.X. 

This is already resolved in global-jjb v0.80.2, however, there is a residual set of code scattered around

in the integration jobs/ (and long scripts) which is generally maintained by Luis and integration folks (Luis), 

which also needs an update.

Ex: 

https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blob/master/jjb/integration/integration-deploy-openstack-run-test.sh 

I've updated some parts of the integration scripts, would be good to test these on the sandbox.

CC: Liuis

Thanks @Anil Belur  let me cc @Luis Gomez  as well

 

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102298

- ab

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:41 PM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:

On 31/08/2022 03:04, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
> Robert and all,
>
> it looks like we are still having some issues in Sulfur integration
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
>
>
> Please let me know if it is ok to pick a RC despite these bgpcep and ofp
> issues

There seems to be a problem with the baseline image -- tests are failing
across the board and across releases due to 'openstack' not being installed.

Not sure how to fix this.

Bye,
Robert

>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:41 AM Daniel de la Rosa via
> lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org>
> <ddelarosa0707=gmail.com@...
> <mailto:gmail.com@...>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:50 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>     <mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
>
>         On 20/08/2022 01:10, Robert Varga wrote:
>          > On 18/08/2022 16:36, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >> Hello TSC and all... As mentioned in the other email thread,
>         we are
>          >> going to skip the code freeze from now on and move forward
>         to pick a
>          >> RC for Sulfur SR2. At this point, it doesn't look like we
>         are ready to
>          >> pick an RC based of what I'm seeing here but @Robert Varga
>          >> <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>> please correct me if
>         I'm wrong
>          >>
>          >>
>         https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
>          >>
>         <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>>
>          >>
>          >
>          > Actually MRI projects have not been update since May due to
>         all the
>          > churn required to get 2022.09 back on regular release schedule.
>          >
>          > The critical issue here is
>          > https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436
>         <https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436>, which has
>         been
>          > resolved this week, so I am spinning releases out -- BUT!
>          >
>          > This means catching up with backports across the board, so
>         this might
>          > take up to a week (or more (*)).
>
>         This is all done now.
>
>
>     Great, thanks! I'll pick a Sulfur SR2 RC on monday 8/29
>
>
>
>         Regards,
>         Robert
>
>

On Sep 8, 2022, at 1:38 AM, <guillaume.lambert@...> <guillaume.lambert@...> wrote:

Hi all

Luis, thanks for the quick status.
About your question, Cédric suggested last week that we had a dedicated meeting

to discuss in which direction we want to go with the CI and Releng.
I don't think there is anythong else planned yet but it would make sense to raise your point at it.

Best Regards

Guillaume

---

De : TSC@... <TSC@...> de la part de Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
Envoyé : jeudi 8 septembre 2022 04:32:03
À : Luis Gomez
Cc : Anil Shashikumar Belur; Daniel de la Rosa; Robert Varga; TSC; Release
Objet : Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Sulfur code freeze for SR2

 

Not really, I forgot our cloud provider was openstack too, so couple of integration scripts stay after this change:

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102309

Anyway, I think Sangwook is already on top of the changes needed, let me know if I can help with anything.

On a separate note, I think virtualenv is being pushed out by docker for resolving python and any other runtime dependency. Anil, is there any plan to move our builders and robot VMs to docker?

BR/Luis

On Sep 7, 2022, at 5:43 PM, Luis Gomez via lists.opendaylight.org <ecelgp=gmail.com@...> wrote:

I do not think any of the integration scripts modified in this CR is used anymore. Let me just push a CSIT clean patch and then you can rebase and continue with your change.

BR/Luis

On Sep 7, 2022, at 12:50 AM, Anil Shashikumar Belur <abelur@...> wrote:

Forgot to include the CR: 

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102298

On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:50 PM Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...> wrote:

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:50 PM Anil Shashikumar Belur <abelur@...> wrote:

Hi Robert, Daniel: 

The issue is not with the baseline image, rather due to the absence of the openstack tools/libs set in the $PATH program

since the system python packages are not up-to-date with the PyPi dependencies, we'll have had to move with

pyenv (much more efficient) while dealing with recent version{s} of Python 3.X. 

This is already resolved in global-jjb v0.80.2, however, there is a residual set of code scattered around

in the integration jobs/ (and long scripts) which is generally maintained by Luis and integration folks (Luis), 

which also needs an update.

Ex: 

https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blob/master/jjb/integration/integration-deploy-openstack-run-test.sh 

I've updated some parts of the integration scripts, would be good to test these on the sandbox.

CC: Liuis

Thanks @Anil Belur  let me cc @Luis Gomez  as well

 

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102298

- ab

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:41 PM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:

On 31/08/2022 03:04, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
> Robert and all,
> 
> it looks like we are still having some issues in Sulfur integration
> 
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
> 
> 
> Please let me know if it is ok to pick a RC despite these bgpcep and ofp 
> issues

There seems to be a problem with the baseline image -- tests are failing 
across the board and across releases due to 'openstack' not being installed.

Not sure how to fix this.

Bye,
Robert

> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:41 AM Daniel de la Rosa via 
> lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org> 
> <ddelarosa0707=gmail.com@... 
> <mailto:gmail.com@...>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:50 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>     <mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
> 
>         On 20/08/2022 01:10, Robert Varga wrote:
>          > On 18/08/2022 16:36, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >> Hello TSC and all... As mentioned in the other email thread,
>         we are
>          >> going to skip the code freeze from now on and move forward
>         to pick a
>          >> RC for Sulfur SR2. At this point, it doesn't look like we
>         are ready to
>          >> pick an RC based of what I'm seeing here but @Robert Varga
>          >> <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>> please correct me if
>         I'm wrong
>          >>
>          >>
>         https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/<https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
>          >>
>         <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/<https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>>
>          >>
>          >
>          > Actually MRI projects have not been update since May due to
>         all the
>          > churn required to get 2022.09 back on regular release schedule.
>          >
>          > The critical issue here is
>          > https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436
>         <https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436>, which has
>         been
>          > resolved this week, so I am spinning releases out -- BUT!
>          >
>          > This means catching up with backports across the board, so
>         this might
>          > take up to a week (or more (*)).
> 
>         This is all done now.
> 
> 
>     Great, thanks! I'll pick a Sulfur SR2 RC on monday 8/29
> 
> 
> 
>         Regards,
>         Robert
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

On Sep 8, 2022, at 4:30 PM, Anil Shashikumar Belur <abelur@...> wrote:

Hi Luis, 

I've been busy working on the python3 changes for the repos, I've noticed that some of the docker releases for ODL are not pushed out. Can you look into this when you have a moment?

As of now the priority is to move to Pipelines, I've setup a meeting for ODL pipelines/CI but do not get enough attendance since it used to be only Mario and myself attending these meetings.

Has there been any progress with getting the interns work on the CSIT jobs and docker?

On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 2:15 AM Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote:

Sure, you can include me in the discussion. I think there is an ongoing effort to move from JJB to Jenkins pipelines, IMO this work could be used to introduce docker based builders (and testers).

BR/Luis

On Sep 8, 2022, at 1:38 AM, <guillaume.lambert@...> <guillaume.lambert@...> wrote:

Hi all

Luis, thanks for the quick status.
About your question, Cédric suggested last week that we had a dedicated meeting

to discuss in which direction we want to go with the CI and Releng.
I don't think there is anythong else planned yet but it would make sense to raise your point at it.

Best Regards

Guillaume

---

De : TSC@... <TSC@...> de la part de Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
Envoyé : jeudi 8 septembre 2022 04:32:03
À : Luis Gomez
Cc : Anil Shashikumar Belur; Daniel de la Rosa; Robert Varga; TSC; Release
Objet : Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Sulfur code freeze for SR2

 

Not really, I forgot our cloud provider was openstack too, so couple of integration scripts stay after this change:

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102309

Anyway, I think Sangwook is already on top of the changes needed, let me know if I can help with anything.

On a separate note, I think virtualenv is being pushed out by docker for resolving python and any other runtime dependency. Anil, is there any plan to move our builders and robot VMs to docker?

BR/Luis

On Sep 7, 2022, at 5:43 PM, Luis Gomez via lists.opendaylight.org <ecelgp=gmail.com@...> wrote:

I do not think any of the integration scripts modified in this CR is used anymore. Let me just push a CSIT clean patch and then you can rebase and continue with your change.

BR/Luis

On Sep 7, 2022, at 12:50 AM, Anil Shashikumar Belur <abelur@...> wrote:

Forgot to include the CR: 

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102298

On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:50 PM Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@...> wrote:

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:50 PM Anil Shashikumar Belur <abelur@...> wrote:

Hi Robert, Daniel: 

The issue is not with the baseline image, rather due to the absence of the openstack tools/libs set in the $PATH program

since the system python packages are not up-to-date with the PyPi dependencies, we'll have had to move with

pyenv (much more efficient) while dealing with recent version{s} of Python 3.X. 

This is already resolved in global-jjb v0.80.2, however, there is a residual set of code scattered around

in the integration jobs/ (and long scripts) which is generally maintained by Luis and integration folks (Luis), 

which also needs an update.

Ex: 

https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blob/master/jjb/integration/integration-deploy-openstack-run-test.sh 

I've updated some parts of the integration scripts, would be good to test these on the sandbox.

CC: Liuis

Thanks @Anil Belur  let me cc @Luis Gomez  as well

 

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/102298

- ab

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:41 PM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:

On 31/08/2022 03:04, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
> Robert and all,
> 
> it looks like we are still having some issues in Sulfur integration
> 
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/ <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
> 
> 
> Please let me know if it is ok to pick a RC despite these bgpcep and ofp 
> issues

There seems to be a problem with the baseline image -- tests are failing 
across the board and across releases due to 'openstack' not being installed.

Not sure how to fix this.

Bye,
Robert

> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:41 AM Daniel de la Rosa via 
> lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org> 
> <ddelarosa0707=gmail.com@... 
> <mailto:gmail.com@...>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:50 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
>     <mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
> 
>         On 20/08/2022 01:10, Robert Varga wrote:
>          > On 18/08/2022 16:36, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>          >> Hello TSC and all... As mentioned in the other email thread,
>         we are
>          >> going to skip the code freeze from now on and move forward
>         to pick a
>          >> RC for Sulfur SR2. At this point, it doesn't look like we
>         are ready to
>          >> pick an RC based of what I'm seeing here but @Robert Varga
>          >> <mailto:nite@... <mailto:nite@...>> please correct me if
>         I'm wrong
>          >>
>          >>
>         https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/<https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>
>          >>
>         <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/<https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-sulfur/>>
>          >>
>          >
>          > Actually MRI projects have not been update since May due to
>         all the
>          > churn required to get 2022.09 back on regular release schedule.
>          >
>          > The critical issue here is
>          > https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436
>         <https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1436>, which has
>         been
>          > resolved this week, so I am spinning releases out -- BUT!
>          >
>          > This means catching up with backports across the board, so
>         this might
>          > take up to a week (or more (*)).
> 
>         This is all done now.
> 
> 
>     Great, thanks! I'll pick a Sulfur SR2 RC on monday 8/29
> 
> 
> 
>         Regards,
>         Robert
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.