Date
1 - 3 of 3
[E] Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Log4Shell impacts on ODL releases
Chokka, Manoj
Hi Daniel,
Since the changes are already done, could you prioritize silicon-SR4 first and then others.
Thank you,
BR, Manoj
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:01 PM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:
On 20/01/2022 08:26, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
> Hello Robert
Hey Daniel,
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:42 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
> <mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> these winter holidays we got a present in the form of Log4Shell, which
> affects pretty much all artifacts we have ever released.
>
> As per our release lifecycle rules, this means that:
>
> - all release trains up to and including Aluminium are past their
> End of
> Life and will not be receiving a community-driven release
>
> - Silicon is currently in its Security Support period past its last
> scheduled Service Release, hence will receive an unscheduled
> security-driven SR4 in near future
>
>
> We can review this in the TSC but I think we can release Silicon SR4
> after Phosphorus SR2 and before Sulfur. Thoughts?
Actually, these updates are already pushed out on the branch, i.e.
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-silicon-mvn35-openjdk11/537/
should be okay to release.
Regards,
Robert
Hello Manoj, Robert and all
As suggested, this is a proposed schedule to release Silicon SR4. It's a bit accelerated but I think we can make it work
Please let me know if this works for you
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:30 AM Chokka, Manoj <manoj.chokka@...> wrote:
Hi Daniel,Since the changes are already done, could you prioritize silicon-SR4 first and then others.Thank you,BR, ManojOn Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:01 PM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:On 20/01/2022 08:26, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
> Hello Robert
Hey Daniel,
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:42 AM Robert Varga <nite@...
> <mailto:nite@...>> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> these winter holidays we got a present in the form of Log4Shell, which
> affects pretty much all artifacts we have ever released.
>
> As per our release lifecycle rules, this means that:
>
> - all release trains up to and including Aluminium are past their
> End of
> Life and will not be receiving a community-driven release
>
> - Silicon is currently in its Security Support period past its last
> scheduled Service Release, hence will receive an unscheduled
> security-driven SR4 in near future
>
>
> We can review this in the TSC but I think we can release Silicon SR4
> after Phosphorus SR2 and before Sulfur. Thoughts?
Actually, these updates are already pushed out on the branch, i.e.
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-silicon-mvn35-openjdk11/537/
should be okay to release.
Regards,
Robert
Robert Varga
On 21/01/2022 03:19, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
Regards,
Robert
Hello Manoj, Robert and allSorry, I somehow missed this email. I just finished up cleaning up the BGPCEP regression and the next autorelease run should be all good.
As suggested, this is a proposed schedule to release Silicon SR4. It's a bit accelerated but I think we can make it work
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/display/ODL/Silicon+SR4+Release+Checklist <https://wiki.opendaylight.org/display/ODL/Silicon+SR4+Release+Checklist>
Please let me know if this works for you
Regards,
Robert