Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
--
Overall, it looks really good. Just a few comments. (Don't take the nits the wrong way.)
Content:
* We should probably specify the current SAL interfaces in the MD-SAL layer, e.g., flow programming and inventory
Formatting/fonts/layout:
* It would be great if we could make the font for "First Release" match OPEN DAYLIGHT so that it's less jarring. If we have a name, it would be great to put the name there instead of "first release".
* Boxes are not quite aligned and/or of different sizes in lots of places where they shouldn't be, e.g., the network applications
* I'm not sure why the Open vSwitches switch has a shadow, but none of the others do
* Lots of boxes aren't entirely contained within their parent boxes, e.g., DOVE Mgr, Affinity Service, DDOS stats/traffic redirect
* It's typically DDoS, not DDOS
* Is there a reason we capitalize some things, e.g., all boxes but base network service functions, and don't capitalize others?
I hope this helps,
--Colin
tsc-bounces@... wrote on 08/20/2013 09:19:37 PM:
> From: Phil Robb <probb@...>
> To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
> Date: 08/20/2013 09:19 PM
> Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
> Sent by: tsc-bounces@...
>
> Hello TSC Members:
>
> I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's
> first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity
> check it).
>
> If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and
> it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet,
> presentations, website, etc.).
>
> Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick
> discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions
> or concerns.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil.
> --
> Phil Robb
> Director - Networking Solutions
> The Linux Foundation
> (O) 970-229-5949
> (M) 970-420-4292
> Skype: Phil.Robb[attachment "OpenDaylight First ReleaseV4.pdf"
> deleted by Colin Dixon/Austin/IBM]
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> TSC@...
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Overall, it looks really good. Just a few comments. (Don't take the nits the wrong way.)
Content:
* We should probably specify the current SAL interfaces in the MD-SAL layer, e.g., flow programming and inventory
Formatting/fonts/layout:
* It would be great if we could make the font for "First Release" match OPEN DAYLIGHT so that it's less jarring. If we have a name, it would be great to put the name there instead of "first release".
* Boxes are not quite aligned and/or of different sizes in lots of places where they shouldn't be, e.g., the network applications
* I'm not sure why the Open vSwitches switch has a shadow, but none of the others do
* Lots of boxes aren't entirely contained within their parent boxes, e.g., DOVE Mgr, Affinity Service, DDOS stats/traffic redirect
* It's typically DDoS, not DDOS
* Is there a reason we capitalize some things, e.g., all boxes but base network service functions, and don't capitalize others?
I hope this helps,
--Colin
tsc-bounces@... wrote on 08/20/2013 09:19:37 PM:
> From: Phil Robb <probb@...>
> To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
> Date: 08/20/2013 09:19 PM
> Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
> Sent by: tsc-bounces@...> Skype: Phil.Robb[attachment "OpenDaylight First ReleaseV4.pdf"
>
> Hello TSC Members:
>
> I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's
> first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity
> check it).
>
> If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and
> it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet,
> presentations, website, etc.).
>
> Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick
> discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions
> or concerns.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil.
> --
> Phil Robb
> Director - Networking Solutions
> The Linux Foundation
> (O) 970-229-5949
> (M) 970-420-4292
> deleted by Colin Dixon/Austin/IBM]
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> TSC@...
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Best wishes!
Baohua
it looks like the "controller platform" and the "southbound interfaces
& protocol plugins" aren't aligned.
Thanks all for the fine work on this.
--dmm
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first
release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will
go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website,
etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion
on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Very nice work. I'll just add one thing (I think) to what Colin said:
it looks like the "controller platform" and the "southbound interfaces
& protocol plugins" aren't aligned.
Thanks all for the fine work on this.
--dmm
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
> Hello TSC Members:
>
> I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first
> release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
>
> If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will
> go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website,
> etc.).
>
> Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion
> on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil.
> --
> Phil Robb
> Director - Networking Solutions
> The Linux Foundation
> (O) 970-229-5949
> (M) 970-420-4292
> Skype: Phil.Robb
>
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> TSC@...
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Best wishes!
Baohua
Phil,
I think that a better representation of the Defense4All contributions will be to separate the statistics and redirection services and do not to label them “DDoS” (we hope these services are generic and will be used in the future for other purposes). On the other hand I think the anomaly detection and mitigation management boxes should be a single box label Anti-DDoS or DDoS protection, the anomaly detection and mitigation management components are internal and will not be contributed as separate components (at least not now), hence I think it is better represented as a single box
Regards,
Benny
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:20 AM
To: tsc@...
Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website, etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
Besides, there's no DOVE support at the release?--On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:58 PM, David Meyer <dmm@...> wrote:
Very nice work. I'll just add one thing (I think) to what Colin said:
it looks like the "controller platform" and the "southbound interfaces
& protocol plugins" aren't aligned.
Thanks all for the fine work on this.
--dmm
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
> Hello TSC Members:
>
> I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first
> release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
>
> If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will
> go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website,
> etc.).
>
> Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion
> on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil.
> --
> Phil Robb
> Director - Networking Solutions
> The Linux Foundation
> (O) 970-229-5949
> (M) 970-420-4292
> Skype: Phil.Robb
>
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> TSC@...
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Best wishes!
Baohua
Phil,
I think that a better representation of the Defense4All contributions will be to separate the statistics and redirection services and do not to label them “DDoS” (we hope these services are generic and will be used in the future for other purposes). On the other hand I think the anomaly detection and mitigation management boxes should be a single box label Anti-DDoS or DDoS protection, the anomaly detection and mitigation management components are internal and will not be contributed as separate components (at least not now), hence I think it is better represented as a single box
Regards,
Benny
From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:20 AM
To: tsc@...
Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website, etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:19:03 -0600
To: Benny Rochwerger <BennyR@...>
Cc: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>, Avi Chesla <AviCh@...>
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Phil,
I think that a better representation of the Defense4All contributions will be to separate the statistics and redirection services and do not to label them “DDoS” (we hope these services are generic and will be used in the future for other purposes). On the other hand I think the anomaly detection and mitigation management boxes should be a single box label Anti-DDoS or DDoS protection, the anomaly detection and mitigation management components are internal and will not be contributed as separate components (at least not now), hence I think it is better represented as a single box
Regards,
Benny
From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:20 AM
To: tsc@...
Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website, etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
Hello TSC Members:I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website, etc.).Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.Thanks,Phil.
--Phil RobbDirector - Networking SolutionsThe Linux Foundation(O) 970-229-5949(M) 970-420-4292Skype: Phil.Robb
First, nice work.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
Hello Again TSC Members:My sense is that it is pretty close. BTW, what I like most about the
Thanks again to everyone for your excellent feedback!
Please take a look at the updated OpenDaylight Graphic for the first
release.
I have tried to incorporate everyone's comments and suggestions. Please
take another look and let me know your thoughts.
My apologies for putting a time crunch on this, but if we are going to hit
our collateral deadline, I need all comments back before the close of
business on Monday (8/26). That is when I will send it to the graphics
professionals who will get everything just right as well as put it into the
correct color scheme (ie the colors are going to change and be much closer
to the first graphic).
graphic is that It is not too complicated and at the same time gets
the point across that there are a lot of interesting things happening
the first release.
--dmm
Thanks for your help on this.
Phil.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...>
wrote:
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first
release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it
will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations,
website, etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick
discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or
concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Hello Again TSC Members:Thanks again to everyone for your excellent feedback!Please take a look at the updated OpenDaylight Graphic for the first release.I have tried to incorporate everyone's comments and suggestions. Please take another look and let me know your thoughts.My apologies for putting a time crunch on this, but if we are going to hit our collateral deadline, I need all comments back before the close of business on Monday (8/26). That is when I will send it to the graphics professionals who will get everything just right as well as put it into the correct color scheme (ie the colors are going to change and be much closer to the first graphic).Thanks for your help on this.Phil.On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
Hello TSC Members:I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website, etc.).Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.Thanks,Phil.
--Phil RobbDirector - Networking SolutionsThe Linux Foundation(O) 970-229-5949(M) 970-420-4292Skype: Phil.Robb--Phil RobbDirector - Networking SolutionsThe Linux Foundation(O) 970-229-5949(M) 970-420-4292Skype: Phil.Robb
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Best wishes!
Baohua
Ken,
Our intention is definitely to reuse, and only expand when there is a need for something new. As you probably notices, in the new diagram there is no DDoS statistics collection service anymore. We plan to leverage the stats-manager, and if only something is missing in it, then expand it.
Benny
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:51 PM
To: Phil Robb; Benny Rochwerger
Cc: tsc@...; Avi Chesla
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
That's a great question and the crux of the "reuse/expand" philosophy. Every contributor can't have overlapping modules unless there's a real case for why that NEEDS to be that way. From a drawing perspective you can just take Stats our of the DDOS traffic redirect. The question that even that modification would lead me to ask is where is the implied state management …and that comes from "how would the state managed by the DDOS traffic redirect service differ from that managed by another flow management service?"
From:
Phil Robb <probb@...>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:19:03 -0600
To: Benny Rochwerger <BennyR@...>
Cc: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>, Avi Chesla <AviCh@...>
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Hi Benny:
Thanks very much for the corrections. Your suggestions make sense to me, but here are a couple of follow-up questions so that I am totally clear:
1) If I understand you correctly, there will be a single application contributed that sits above the OpenDaylight REST APIs and the application will perform both Anomaly Detection and DDoS Mitigation Management functions. That application you would like to call "DDoS Protection", or "Anti-DDoS"?
2) If I generically label the Defense4All box as "Statistics Service", the first question we will get is "why is there a generic base service "Statistiics Mgr." and a separate "Statistics Service". If the Defense4All statistics service is generic, can we instead augment the existing statistics manager instead of having two? If not, does the Defense4All statistics service use the base-function statistics manager? What different and separate functions does the Defense4All Statistics Service provide?
Thanks Benny,
Phil..
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Benny Rochwerger <BennyR@...> wrote:
Phil,
I think that a better representation of the Defense4All contributions will be to separate the statistics and redirection services and do not to label them “DDoS” (we hope these services are generic and will be used in the future for other purposes). On the other hand I think the anomaly detection and mitigation management boxes should be a single box label Anti-DDoS or DDoS protection, the anomaly detection and mitigation management components are internal and will not be contributed as separate components (at least not now), hence I think it is better represented as a single box
Regards,
Benny
From:
tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:20 AM
To: tsc@...
Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website, etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Hello Again TSC Members:Thanks again to everyone for your excellent feedback!Please take a look at the updated OpenDaylight Graphic for the first release.I have tried to incorporate everyone's comments and suggestions. Please take another look and let me know your thoughts.My apologies for putting a time crunch on this, but if we are going to hit our collateral deadline, I need all comments back before the close of business on Monday (8/26). That is when I will send it to the graphics professionals who will get everything just right as well as put it into the correct color scheme (ie the colors are going to change and be much closer to the first graphic).Thanks for your help on this.Phil.On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
Hello TSC Members:I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website, etc.).Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.Thanks,Phil.
--Phil RobbDirector - Networking SolutionsThe Linux Foundation(O) 970-229-5949(M) 970-420-4292Skype: Phil.Robb--Phil RobbDirector - Networking SolutionsThe Linux Foundation(O) 970-229-5949(M) 970-420-4292Skype: Phil.Robb
Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:46 PM
To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Hello Again TSC Members:
Thanks again to everyone for your excellent feedback!
Please take a look at the updated OpenDaylight Graphic for the first release.
I have tried to incorporate everyone's comments and suggestions. Please take another look and let me know your thoughts.
My apologies for putting a time crunch on this, but if we are going to hit our collateral deadline, I need all comments back before the close of business on Monday (8/26). That is when I will send it to the graphics professionals who will get everything just right as well as put it into the correct color scheme (ie the colors are going to change and be much closer to the first graphic).
Thanks for your help on this.
Phil.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website, etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking SolutionsThe Linux Foundation(O) 970-229-5949(M) 970-420-4292Skype: Phil.Robb
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking SolutionsThe Linux Foundation(O) 970-229-5949(M) 970-420-4292Skype: Phil.Robb
Date: Thursday, August 29, 2013 8:02 AM
To: Phil Robb <probb@...>, "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:46 PM
To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Hello Again TSC Members:
Thanks again to everyone for your excellent feedback!
Please take a look at the updated OpenDaylight Graphic for the first release.
I have tried to incorporate everyone's comments and suggestions. Please take another look and let me know your thoughts.
My apologies for putting a time crunch on this, but if we are going to hit our collateral deadline, I need all comments back before the close of business on Monday (8/26). That is when I will send it to the graphics professionals who will get everything just right as well as put it into the correct color scheme (ie the colors are going to change and be much closer to the first graphic).
Thanks for your help on this.
Phil.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations, website, etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking SolutionsThe Linux Foundation(O) 970-229-5949(M) 970-420-4292Skype: Phil.Robb
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking SolutionsThe Linux Foundation(O) 970-229-5949(M) 970-420-4292Skype: Phil.Robb
<vmadhu@...> wrote:
Hi Phil,So here's a question: to what extent will code built for the
With various discussions around the SAL and not all the south-bound plugins
may adopt MD-SAL approach for the first release,
Should we change the graphic to reflect the eventual reality of having both
Traditional SAL & MD-SAL co-existing during the first-release ?
Eventually, it will all be MD-SAL, but (at least to me) it seems overly
aggressive to call it MD-SAL only for the first release.
non-MD-SAL have to be re{written,factored} in moving to the MD-SAL,
and what are the issues one should consider in building code for the
first release (non-MD-SAL) to make "conversion" to the MD-SAL as
painless as possible?
--dmm
Just my 2c.
Thanks,
Madhu
From: Phil Robb <probb@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:46 PM
To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Thanks to everyone for your comments of approval on the updated architecture
diagram. I have not received any suggested edits so I have sent it to the
graphic designers for final touches.
I'll send out the final version once I receive it.
Phil.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...>
wrote:
Hello Again TSC Members:
Thanks again to everyone for your excellent feedback!
Please take a look at the updated OpenDaylight Graphic for the first
release.
I have tried to incorporate everyone's comments and suggestions. Please
take another look and let me know your thoughts.
My apologies for putting a time crunch on this, but if we are going to hit
our collateral deadline, I need all comments back before the close of
business on Monday (8/26). That is when I will send it to the graphics
professionals who will get everything just right as well as put it into the
correct color scheme (ie the colors are going to change and be much closer
to the first graphic).
Thanks for your help on this.
Phil.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...>
wrote:
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first
release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and it
will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations,
website, etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick
discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or
concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Essentially, my suggestion is to have both AD-SAL (API Driven SAL) - am just inventing this acronym here :-)Or just call it SAL. I think it's hard to get that kind of subtlty
and MD-SAL (Model Driven SAL) in the picture which will give architecture space for the release.
across with a single graphic. From a user perspective...AD/MD...
internel implementation detail.
thanks,
-chris
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Madhu Venugopal (vmadhu)
<vmadhu@...> wrote:Hi Phil,So here's a question: to what extent will code built for the
With various discussions around the SAL and not all the south-bound
plugins
may adopt MD-SAL approach for the first release,
Should we change the graphic to reflect the eventual reality of having
both
Traditional SAL & MD-SAL co-existing during the first-release ?
Eventually, it will all be MD-SAL, but (at least to me) it seems overly
aggressive to call it MD-SAL only for the first release.
non-MD-SAL have to be re{written,factored} in moving to the MD-SAL,
Can generate the exact SAL API Contract as AD-SAL. If this is achievedIf MD-SAL development is done with easy-migration in mind, then the
Yang auto code generation
the Functional Modules,
NB-API modules and Plugin Modules has no change. But practically, it is
extremely difficult to
achieve and I will not even recommend that approach (fearing hacks in a
potential clean MD-SAL approach).
(which is almost all bundles) would need modifications. Also I hopeAssuming the Easy-migration is not considered, then every bit of code
that depend on existing SAL
that MD-SAL will render some of the
Redundant code auto-generated and hence the need for such modifications
can be minimal. Again it is
Difficult to answer until we have at least 1 working plugin to gauge
the real impact.
and what are the issues one should consider in building code for the
first release (non-MD-SAL) to make "conversion" to the MD-SAL as
painless as possible?
approach. If we can pull in all the common set of issues inside theEd started with an Archetype to help with a template project for
MD-SAL. I think that is the right
template, then the migration can be
Made painless. With Modal-driven programming new to most (I take the
liberty in calling it as most),
It is just the inertia of change that is the biggest bottleneck. Tony,
Ed & others are doing great
in getting the community upto speed. If we continue on this we should
be able to make the change.
-Madhu
--dmm
Just my 2c.
Thanks,
Madhu
From: Phil Robb <probb@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:46 PM
To: "tsc@..." <tsc@...>
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Open Daylight Graphic for First Release
Thanks to everyone for your comments of approval on the updated
architecture
diagram. I have not received any suggested edits so I have sent it to
the
graphic designers for final touches.
I'll send out the final version once I receive it.
Phil.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...>
wrote:
Hello Again TSC Members:
Thanks again to everyone for your excellent feedback!
Please take a look at the updated OpenDaylight Graphic for the first
release.
I have tried to incorporate everyone's comments and suggestions.
Please
take another look and let me know your thoughts.
My apologies for putting a time crunch on this, but if we are going to
hit
our collateral deadline, I need all comments back before the close of
business on Monday (8/26). That is when I will send it to the graphics
professionals who will get everything just right as well as put it
into the
correct color scheme (ie the colors are going to change and be much
closer
to the first graphic).
Thanks for your help on this.
Phil.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Phil Robb <probb@...>
wrote:
Hello TSC Members:
I'v been working on an updated graphic to depict OpenDaylight's first
release (thanks to Anees for his willingness to review/sanity check
it).
If everyone is good with it, I'll give it to the marketing folks and
it
will go onto a variety of our collateral (data sheet, presentations,
website, etc.).
Let me know your thoughts via email and maybe we can have a quick
discussion on it during this week's TSC call if there are questions or
concerns.
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
* Madhu Venugopal (vmadhu) (vmadhu@...) wrote:Essentially, my suggestion is to have both AD-SAL (API Driven SAL) - amOr just call it SAL. I think it's hard to get that kind of subtlty
just inventing this acronym here :-)
and MD-SAL (Model Driven SAL) in the picture which will give
architecture space for the release.
across with a single graphic. From a user perspective...AD/MD...
internel implementation detail.
SAL (API Driven and Model Driven).Agreed. If others see a need to highlight these, we can do something
like
Thanks,
Madhu
thanks,
-chris