Date
1 - 8 of 8
Revised merged controller proposal
Rob Sherwood
After looking in depth into the implications of Colin and Dave's proposal, we ran into a bunch of concerns. Attached is a proposal which we believe addresses those concerns while trying to keep to (at least my understanding of) the spirit of what Colin and Dave were advocating.
I know there's a lot on the TSC agenda, but particularly given the impending deadline, I'd like to get a time slot of discuss this proposal on today's call.
I'll also post this to discuss to see if we can get more comments going than my previous merge d controller proposal.
Open to comments,
- Rob
.
David Meyer <dmm@...>
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@...> wrote:
going to push everything else off so we can discuss moving forward.
Also, thank you for posting your pdf to the discuss list (as you can
see I've copied discuss into this thread). We'll work with Phil to get
the limits on the wiki changed.
Thanks again,
--dmm
After looking in depth into the implications of Colin and Dave's proposal,BTW, I updated the agenda to give you a slot; I'm thinking now I'm
we ran into a bunch of concerns. Attached is a proposal which we believe
addresses those concerns while trying to keep to (at least my understanding
of) the spirit of what Colin and Dave were advocating.
I know there's a lot on the TSC agenda, but particularly given the impending
deadline, I'd like to get a time slot of discuss this proposal on today's
call.
I'll also post this to discuss to see if we can get more comments going than
my previous merge d controller proposal.
going to push everything else off so we can discuss moving forward.
Also, thank you for posting your pdf to the discuss list (as you can
see I've copied discuss into this thread). We'll work with Phil to get
the limits on the wiki changed.
Thanks again,
--dmm
Open to comments,
- Rob
.
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
David Meyer <dmm@...>
Actually, now I see you only sent your proposal to tsc@ (unless I
can't keep track of what is cross posted where, which has non-zero
probability). Any reason why it can't go to discuss?
--dmm
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
can't keep track of what is cross posted where, which has non-zero
probability). Any reason why it can't go to discuss?
--dmm
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@...> wrote:
After looking in depth into the implications of Colin and Dave's proposal,
we ran into a bunch of concerns. Attached is a proposal which we believe
addresses those concerns while trying to keep to (at least my understanding
of) the spirit of what Colin and Dave were advocating.
I know there's a lot on the TSC agenda, but particularly given the impending
deadline, I'd like to get a time slot of discuss this proposal on today's
call.
I'll also post this to discuss to see if we can get more comments going than
my previous merge d controller proposal.
Open to comments,
- Rob
.
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Phil Robb
The proposal was waiting on moderator approval this morning and I released it to both Discuss and TSC lists a little while ago.
The wiki issue seems to be a bug I'm working on right now. The file limit is set to 8M and Rob's proposal pdf is only 1.1M.... so something is wrong... I'll get the doc up on the wiki as soon as we figure it out.
Phil.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, David Meyer <dmm@...> wrote:
Actually, now I see you only sent your proposal to tsc@ (unless I
can't keep track of what is cross posted where, which has non-zero
probability). Any reason why it can't go to discuss?
--dmm
> After looking in depth into the implications of Colin and Dave's proposal,
> we ran into a bunch of concerns. Attached is a proposal which we believe
> addresses those concerns while trying to keep to (at least my understanding
> of) the spirit of what Colin and Dave were advocating.
>
> I know there's a lot on the TSC agenda, but particularly given the impending
> deadline, I'd like to get a time slot of discuss this proposal on today's
> call.
>
> I'll also post this to discuss to see if we can get more comments going than
> my previous merge d controller proposal.
>
> Open to comments,
>
> - Rob
> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> TSC@...
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
David Meyer <dmm@...>
Thanks Phil. --dmm
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
The proposal was waiting on moderator approval this morning and I released
it to both Discuss and TSC lists a little while ago.
The wiki issue seems to be a bug I'm working on right now. The file limit
is set to 8M and Rob's proposal pdf is only 1.1M.... so something is
wrong... I'll get the doc up on the wiki as soon as we figure it out.
Phil.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, David Meyer <dmm@...> wrote:
Actually, now I see you only sent your proposal to tsc@ (unless I
can't keep track of what is cross posted where, which has non-zero
probability). Any reason why it can't go to discuss?
--dmm
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@...>
wrote:After looking in depth into the implications of Colin and Dave's_______________________________________________
proposal,
we ran into a bunch of concerns. Attached is a proposal which we
believe
addresses those concerns while trying to keep to (at least my
understanding
of) the spirit of what Colin and Dave were advocating.
I know there's a lot on the TSC agenda, but particularly given the
impending
deadline, I'd like to get a time slot of discuss this proposal on
today's
call.
I'll also post this to discuss to see if we can get more comments going
than
my previous merge d controller proposal.
Open to comments,
- Rob
.
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
Phil Robb
OK, I think the wiki is now fixed (thanks as always to Andrew Grimberg's prompt and expert responses).
Rob, can you try to upload the Layered API proposal again?
Phil.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:37 AM, David Meyer <dmm@...> wrote:
Thanks Phil. --dmm
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
> The proposal was waiting on moderator approval this morning and I released
> it to both Discuss and TSC lists a little while ago.
>
> The wiki issue seems to be a bug I'm working on right now. The file limit
> is set to 8M and Rob's proposal pdf is only 1.1M.... so something is
> wrong... I'll get the doc up on the wiki as soon as we figure it out.
>
> Phil.
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, David Meyer <dmm@...> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, now I see you only sent your proposal to tsc@ (unless I
>> can't keep track of what is cross posted where, which has non-zero
>> probability). Any reason why it can't go to discuss?
>>
>> --dmm
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@...>
>> wrote:
>> > After looking in depth into the implications of Colin and Dave's
>> > proposal,
>> > we ran into a bunch of concerns. Attached is a proposal which we
>> > believe
>> > addresses those concerns while trying to keep to (at least my
>> > understanding
>> > of) the spirit of what Colin and Dave were advocating.
>> >
>> > I know there's a lot on the TSC agenda, but particularly given the
>> > impending
>> > deadline, I'd like to get a time slot of discuss this proposal on
>> > today's
>> > call.
>> >
>> > I'll also post this to discuss to see if we can get more comments going
>> > than
>> > my previous merge d controller proposal.
>> >
>> > Open to comments,
>> >
>> > - Rob
>> > .
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > TSC mailing list
>> > TSC@...
>> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> TSC mailing list
>> TSC@...
>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>
>
>
>
> --
> Phil Robb
> Director - Networking Solutions
> The Linux Foundation
> (O) 970-229-5949
> (M) 970-420-4292
> Skype: Phil.Robb
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
David Meyer <dmm@...>
And Rob, can you post to discuss? Thnx, --dmm
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Phil Robb <probb@...> wrote:
OK, I think the wiki is now fixed (thanks as always to Andrew Grimberg's
prompt and expert responses).
Rob, can you try to upload the Layered API proposal again?
Phil.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:37 AM, David Meyer <dmm@...> wrote:
Thanks Phil. --dmm
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Phil Robb <probb@...>
wrote:The proposal was waiting on moderator approval this morning and I
released
it to both Discuss and TSC lists a little while ago.
The wiki issue seems to be a bug I'm working on right now. The file
limit
is set to 8M and Rob's proposal pdf is only 1.1M.... so something is
wrong... I'll get the doc up on the wiki as soon as we figure it out.
Phil.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, David Meyer <dmm@...> wrote:
Actually, now I see you only sent your proposal to tsc@ (unless I
can't keep track of what is cross posted where, which has non-zero
probability). Any reason why it can't go to discuss?
--dmm
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Rob Sherwood
<rob.sherwood@...>
wrote:After looking in depth into the implications of Colin and Dave's_______________________________________________
proposal,
we ran into a bunch of concerns. Attached is a proposal which we
believe
addresses those concerns while trying to keep to (at least my
understanding
of) the spirit of what Colin and Dave were advocating.
I know there's a lot on the TSC agenda, but particularly given the
impending
deadline, I'd like to get a time slot of discuss this proposal on
today's
call.
I'll also post this to discuss to see if we can get more comments
going
than
my previous merge d controller proposal.
Open to comments,
- Rob
.
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
--
Phil Robb
Director - Networking Solutions
The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
Chris Wright <chrisw@...>
* Rob Sherwood (rob.sherwood@...) wrote:
After looking in depth into the implications of Colin and Dave's proposal,No. Discuss is that way -->> discuss@...
we ran into a bunch of concerns. Attached is a proposal which we believe
addresses those concerns while trying to keep to (at least my understanding
of) the spirit of what Colin and Dave were advocating.
I know there's a lot on the TSC agenda, but particularly given the
impending deadline, I'd like to get a time slot of discuss this proposal on
today's call.