Date
1 - 4 of 4
Vote: making BGPCEP a Release Integrated project
|
Robert Varga
And +1 from me as well.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
This vote carries with 3 in favor, 2 not voted and no objects. I will prepare a transition plan and execute it by the Phosphorus MRI window. Regards, Robert On 23/02/2021 08:48, Dana Kutenicsova wrote:
+1 |
|
|
|
Claudio David Gasparini <claudio.gasparini@...>
+1
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Varga <nite@...> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 5:20 PM To: Claudio David Gasparini <claudio.gasparini@...>; dkutenicsova@...; Ajay Lele <ajayslele@...>; DUGEON Olivier IMT/OLN <olivier.dugeon@...> Cc: app-dev@... Subject: Vote: making BGPCEP a Release Integrated project Hello everyone, as you might be aware, I have been removing projects from autorelease and switching them to Release Integrated (as opposed to Snapshot Integrated) lifecycle. The gory details about the differences are documented here: https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/release-process/managed-release.html#managed-release-integrated-release-process, but it all boils down to two things: - the project is responsible for spinning its own release artifacts - the project's downstream use its released versions, not SNAPSHOTs In current (Silicon) Simultaneous Release cycle, both AAA and NETCONF are now MRI projects, which opens up the possibility for BGPCEP to do the same. I am not aware of any benefits remaining Snapshot Integrated would bring to BGPCEP and would therefore transition BGPCEP to MRI as well. To that effect, BGPCEP committers, please cast your vote in the usual -1/0/+1 manner on the following question: Do you approve BGPCEP becoming a Managed Release Integrated project? Other community members are welcome to chime in as well :) Thanks, Robert |
|
|
|
Dana Kutenicsova <dkutenicsova@...>
+1
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Varga <nite@...> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 5:20 PM To: Claudio David Gasparini <claudio.gasparini@...>; Dana Kutenicsova <dkutenicsova@...>; Ajay Lele <ajayslele@...>; DUGEON Olivier IMT/OLN <olivier.dugeon@...> Cc: app-dev@... Subject: Vote: making BGPCEP a Release Integrated project Hello everyone, as you might be aware, I have been removing projects from autorelease and switching them to Release Integrated (as opposed to Snapshot Integrated) lifecycle. The gory details about the differences are documented here: https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/release-process/managed-release.html#managed-release-integrated-release-process, but it all boils down to two things: - the project is responsible for spinning its own release artifacts - the project's downstream use its released versions, not SNAPSHOTs In current (Silicon) Simultaneous Release cycle, both AAA and NETCONF are now MRI projects, which opens up the possibility for BGPCEP to do the same. I am not aware of any benefits remaining Snapshot Integrated would bring to BGPCEP and would therefore transition BGPCEP to MRI as well. To that effect, BGPCEP committers, please cast your vote in the usual -1/0/+1 manner on the following question: Do you approve BGPCEP becoming a Managed Release Integrated project? Other community members are welcome to chime in as well :) Thanks, Robert |
|
|
|
Robert Varga
Hello everyone,
as you might be aware, I have been removing projects from autorelease and switching them to Release Integrated (as opposed to Snapshot Integrated) lifecycle. The gory details about the differences are documented here: https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/release-process/managed-release.html#managed-release-integrated-release-process, but it all boils down to two things: - the project is responsible for spinning its own release artifacts - the project's downstream use its released versions, not SNAPSHOTs In current (Silicon) Simultaneous Release cycle, both AAA and NETCONF are now MRI projects, which opens up the possibility for BGPCEP to do the same. I am not aware of any benefits remaining Snapshot Integrated would bring to BGPCEP and would therefore transition BGPCEP to MRI as well. To that effect, BGPCEP committers, please cast your vote in the usual -1/0/+1 manner on the following question: Do you approve BGPCEP becoming a Managed Release Integrated project? Other community members are welcome to chime in as well :) Thanks, Robert |
|
|