On May 11, 2019, at 3:17 AM, Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:

On 11/05/2019 12:08, Robert Varga wrote:

Yeah, I am not sure current AR submodules cover all projects we want in
ODL, specially the MRI projects that are not part of AR. Best place to
see project and version for a given branch is this file in distribution:

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=integration/distribution.git;a=blob;f=artifacts/upstream/properties/pom.xml;h=e4c41bbb29400d2e53166b8cf1e19d4c4baa4067;hb=HEAD

Actually, we should not be relying on ODL source code repositories to
find the models.

Models should be extracted from .jars which are part of a built
distribution (.zip/.tar.gz) -- hence whatever job publishes them should
react to integration/distribution being updated.

There are two main reasons for that:
- we only want to publish models we actually ship, not various testing
models etc.
- YANG files packaged in jars have their names normalized to YANG
specification (i.e. file name matches module/submodule declaration,
revision is part of name) -- that is not how we store them in git repos

And yes, Michael's patches are doing the wrong thing by sifting through
our source code repositories -- they'd pick up things like CSIT driver
models and mdsal-binding-test-model (which supports MD-SAL unit tests)
-- provided mdsal were a part of autorelease, which it is not.

The script to extract the modules from an unpacked distribution already
lives here:
https://github.com/opendaylight/integration-distribution/blob/master/scripts/extract_modules.sh

Regards,
Robert