|
Re: [controller-dev] Clustering question
Hi Giovanni,
I agree that connection-manager shouldbe the culmination point and Inifinispan based implementation meets theneed very much well - thanks to the transaction. That's why mentionedthat
Hi Giovanni,
I agree that connection-manager shouldbe the culmination point and Inifinispan based implementation meets theneed very much well - thanks to the transaction. That's why mentionedthat
|
By
Muthukumaran Kothandaraman <mkothand@...>
·
#146
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Clustering question
Hi Muthukumaran,
just some answers inline ...
this i'm thinking to provide via GIT so we gain sharing and versioning of the configuration.
this is already provided by connection manager, using the
Hi Muthukumaran,
just some answers inline ...
this i'm thinking to provide via GIT so we gain sharing and versioning of the configuration.
this is already provided by connection manager, using the
|
By
Giovanni Meo <gmeo@...>
·
#139
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Clustering question
Hi Colin,
i would love to see an alternative implementation, so to really weights pro and cons. On the point of doing a raw implementation over Jgroups well i suspect it will end up looking very much
Hi Colin,
i would love to see an alternative implementation, so to really weights pro and cons. On the point of doing a raw implementation over Jgroups well i suspect it will end up looking very much
|
By
Giovanni Meo <gmeo@...>
·
#138
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Clustering question
From earlier experiences in zookeeper
- it is better to avoid zookeeper interactionson performance-sensitive code path because it involves a network call (incase of distributed-queues and barriers
From earlier experiences in zookeeper
- it is better to avoid zookeeper interactionson performance-sensitive code path because it involves a network call (incase of distributed-queues and barriers
|
By
Muthukumaran Kothandaraman <mkothand@...>
·
#145
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Clustering question
Curator from Netflix seems to be a reasonablygood client library - http://curator.incubator.apache.org/
Netflix had forked from basic libraryand added better abstractions. This is now a formal Apache
Curator from Netflix seems to be a reasonablygood client library - http://curator.incubator.apache.org/
Netflix had forked from basic libraryand added better abstractions. This is now a formal Apache
|
By
Muthukumaran Kothandaraman <mkothand@...>
·
#144
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Clustering question
Hi David,
I had earlier contemplated on Zookeeperoption. Mainly because of the deployment aspect as mentioned by Giovanni,I had put it in back-burner :-)
Particularly in Zookeeper, we wouldrequire
Hi David,
I had earlier contemplated on Zookeeperoption. Mainly because of the deployment aspect as mentioned by Giovanni,I had put it in back-burner :-)
Particularly in Zookeeper, we wouldrequire
|
By
Muthukumaran Kothandaraman <mkothand@...>
·
#143
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] OpenDaylight Base Edition system test
Yes, and we should also provide a standard reference test topology for most test cases.
Guangpeng, we can discuss this more thoroughly at tomorrow's meeting.
Yes, and we should also provide a standard reference test topology for most test cases.
Guangpeng, we can discuss this more thoroughly at tomorrow's meeting.
|
By
Baohua Yang <yangbaohua@...>
·
#137
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Container Mgr question
Thanks, I did not know about the bidirectional thing, now works after changing to:
Container1:
<flowSpecs>
<name>h1toh3</name>
<nwSrc>10.0.0.1</nwSrc>
Thanks, I did not know about the bidirectional thing, now works after changing to:
Container1:
<flowSpecs>
<name>h1toh3</name>
<nwSrc>10.0.0.1</nwSrc>
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#136
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Container Mgr question
Hi Luis,
Each flow spec configuration is by default bidirectional, backend internally generates a couple of flow specs.
The flow specs are internally represented as a Match object, which represents a
Hi Luis,
Each flow spec configuration is by default bidirectional, backend internally generates a couple of flow specs.
The flow specs are internally represented as a Match object, which represents a
|
By
Alessandro Boch (aboch) <aboch@...>
·
#134
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] OpenDaylight Base Edition system test
Yes, body requests can differ depending on the test environment, I have just added the ones I used in Ericsson lab so if you click on the “body” word in the test plan:
Yes, body requests can differ depending on the test environment, I have just added the ones I used in Ericsson lab so if you click on the “body” word in the test plan:
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#133
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Container Mgr question
Hi Madhu and Alessandro,
I have opened bug #127 for the container Mgr improvement. Now I have another question when I played with the flowspecs:
I configured the following flowspecs for
Hi Madhu and Alessandro,
I have opened bug #127 for the container Mgr improvement. Now I have another question when I played with the flowspecs:
I configured the following flowspecs for
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#132
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Clustering question
Presumably it would be pretty easy to wire up ZooKeeper so that each controller instance ran a ZooKeeper server as an OSGi bundle and the only "clients" were people calling into that bundle.
I think
Presumably it would be pretty easy to wire up ZooKeeper so that each controller instance ran a ZooKeeper server as an OSGi bundle and the only "clients" were people calling into that bundle.
I think
|
By
Colin Dixon <ckd@...>
·
#135
·
|
|
Re: Test management tools
Thanks Carol.
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#131
·
|
|
Re: Test management tools
Hi Luis,
I can install Robot and Jenkins this evening.
Carol
Hi Luis,
I can install Robot and Jenkins this evening.
Carol
|
By
Carol Sanders <carol.sanders@...>
·
#130
·
|
|
Test management tools
Hi Carol and Denghui,
Can you estimate when we will see some test management framework in Ericsson Lab? I can help with the installation if you guide me through it.
Thanks/Luis
Hi Carol and Denghui,
Can you estimate when we will see some test management framework in Ericsson Lab? I can help with the installation if you guide me through it.
Thanks/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#129
·
|
|
Re: New contributors
Hi Saritha,
See my comments inline:
Hi Saritha,
See my comments inline:
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#128
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Timeline for OpenFlow 1.3.1 and support for Neutron
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Controller:Release_Plan_2013
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Controller:Release_Plan_2013
|
By
Dominic Curran <dominic.curran@...>
·
#126
·
|
|
Re: New contributors
Luis,
Thank you for the kick off introduction.
We are excited to work with the team and contribute in this effort.
It would be good if the team can send:
- Information of automation Framework and
Luis,
Thank you for the kick off introduction.
We are excited to work with the team and contribute in this effort.
It would be good if the team can send:
- Information of automation Framework and
|
By
Saritha Yeddula <syeddula@...>
·
#127
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Timeline for OpenFlow 1.3.1 and support for Neutron
Hi, Dear Abhijit/Ryan
Thanks very much. Your information is really helpful. BTW, can you tell me when we can have the Hydrogen release ?
Thanks,
Liang
Hi, Dear Abhijit/Ryan
Thanks very much. Your information is really helpful. BTW, can you tell me when we can have the Hydrogen release ?
Thanks,
Liang
|
By
LIANG YANG <liangy2009@...>
·
#125
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Timeline for OpenFlow 1.3.1 and support for Neutron
Liang-
Support for OpenStack Neutron is planned for the Hydrogen release. As to the current status of pieces, Kyle Mestery (mestery on the IRC channel) is working on the OpenStack plugin (he can
Liang-
Support for OpenStack Neutron is planned for the Hydrogen release. As to the current status of pieces, Kyle Mestery (mestery on the IRC channel) is working on the OpenStack plugin (he can
|
By
Ryan Moats <rmoats@...>
·
#124
·
|