|
Re: l2gatewayConnections model missing after deletion?
Empty lists are disappearing in Neon:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/yangtools-dev/2018-September/002308.html,
so this is fully expected.
Regards,
Robert
Empty lists are disappearing in Neon:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/yangtools-dev/2018-September/002308.html,
so this is fully expected.
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13098
·
|
|
Re: [netvirt-dev] l2gatewayConnections model missing after deletion?
As Jamo said, we are late on our targeted release date, but we are also cutting it tight with the marketing release date which is on Tuesday.
As Jamo said, we are late on our targeted release date, but we are also cutting it tight with the marketing release date which is on Tuesday.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#13097
·
|
|
Re: [netvirt-dev] l2gatewayConnections model missing after deletion?
Isn't this one of the changes that came in Neon, where an empty list now returns null/404 instead of emtpy list? I think we ran into similar issue in another test back in Oct/Nov [can't recall] where
Isn't this one of the changes that came in Neon, where an empty list now returns null/404 instead of emtpy list? I think we ran into similar issue in another test back in Oct/Nov [can't recall] where
|
By
Vishal Thapar <vthapar@...>
·
#13096
·
|
|
l2gatewayConnections model missing after deletion?
I'm digging through the neon csit failures to help sign off for the
release, and came across a failure in neon csit that is not there in
fluorine.
We need to explain it or fix it so we can get the
I'm digging through the neon csit failures to help sign off for the
release, and came across a failure in neon csit that is not there in
fluorine.
We need to explain it or fix it so we can get the
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13095
·
|
|
Re: [netvirt-dev] jobs are failing miserable after builder repo rebase
Looks like the patch upstream has been merged and is in our csit jobs now, so they pass.
Looks like the patch upstream has been merged and is in our csit jobs now, so they pass.
|
By
Sam Hague <shague@...>
·
#13094
·
|
|
Re: Provision mininet-ovs-{25, 26} images with Ansible.
Yeah, the main netvirt jobs don't spin up the tools vms. As Venkat mentions the tools_count is 0.
Yeah, the main netvirt jobs don't spin up the tools vms. As Venkat mentions the tools_count is 0.
|
By
Sam Hague <shague@...>
·
#13093
·
|
|
Re: Provision mininet-ovs-{25, 26} images with Ansible.
Hi Anil,
I think the count is zero, It is not spinning up any VM with that image.
--
Regards,
Venkatrangan G
Hi Anil,
I think the count is zero, It is not spinning up any VM with that image.
--
Regards,
Venkatrangan G
|
By
Venkatrangan
·
#13092
·
|
|
Re: Provision mininet-ovs-{25, 26} images with Ansible.
Hi Venkat:
Good point. on job no [3.], if we are not using the mininet image we should consider removing that from the job{s}. From the logs we can see
its booting up test VM/node and not really using
Hi Venkat:
Good point. on job no [3.], if we are not using the mininet image we should consider removing that from the job{s}. From the logs we can see
its booting up test VM/node and not really using
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13091
·
|
|
Re: Provision mininet-ovs-{25, 26} images with Ansible.
Hi Anil,
Just started reviewing the patches. I think the job [3] does not use any mininet image. There are many other jobs like BGPCEP jobs that will use other components like exabgp. They
Hi Anil,
Just started reviewing the patches. I think the job [3] does not use any mininet image. There are many other jobs like BGPCEP jobs that will use other components like exabgp. They
|
By
Venkatrangan
·
#13090
·
|
|
Re: Provision mininet-ovs-{25, 26} images with Ansible.
+int/dev lists
Thanks,
Anil
+int/dev lists
Thanks,
Anil
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13089
·
|
|
Re: Daylight saving
Hi Everyone,
I'm still up at 12 am so don't worry about it, not a problem for me, I can make it work.
Regards,
Thanh
Hi Everyone,
I'm still up at 12 am so don't worry about it, not a problem for me, I can make it work.
Regards,
Thanh
|
By
Thanh Ha <thanh.ha@...>
·
#13088
·
|
|
Re: [netvirt-dev] jobs are failing miserable after builder repo rebase
OK, looks like the patch has merged in openstack side. Any idea how long that takes before we have the updates in CSIT?
The neon RC's are blocked on this since those jobs failed. We need to rerun the
OK, looks like the patch has merged in openstack side. Any idea how long that takes before we have the updates in CSIT?
The neon RC's are blocked on this since those jobs failed. We need to rerun the
|
By
Sam Hague <shague@...>
·
#13087
·
|
|
Re: Daylight saving
Ohh okay!
Is it okay then if I sync up with Karthika offline, in case I won't be able to make it regularly?
Thanks,
Faseela
Ohh okay!
Is it okay then if I sync up with Karthika offline, in case I won't be able to make it regularly?
Thanks,
Faseela
|
By
Faseela K
·
#13086
·
|
|
Re: Daylight saving
Well, this is going to be awful time for Thanh (12:00 AM), any chance you can make it it earlier?
Well, this is going to be awful time for Thanh (12:00 AM), any chance you can make it it earlier?
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13085
·
|
|
Re: LISP Flow Mapping CSIT fix
Thanks a lot Daniel!
-Lori
Thanks a lot Daniel!
-Lori
|
By
Lori Jakab <lorand.jakab+odl@...>
·
#13084
·
|
|
Re: jobs are failing miserable after builder repo rebase
Look into the stack.log in the compute_1 folder. At the very bottom you will see why the stack failed. Might be related to the jjb stuff, but that log details what failed.
Look into the stack.log in the compute_1 folder. At the very bottom you will see why the stack failed. Might be related to the jjb stuff, but that log details what failed.
|
By
Sam Hague <shague@...>
·
#13083
·
|
|
Re: jobs are failing miserable after builder repo rebase
Hi,
The jobs will stack successfully once this patch gets merged - [0]. The git uses a wrong option in control node.
[0] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/642927/
--
Regards,
Venkatrangan G
Hi,
The jobs will stack successfully once this patch gets merged - [0]. The git uses a wrong option in control node.
[0] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/642927/
--
Regards,
Venkatrangan G
|
By
Venkatrangan
·
#13082
·
|
|
Re: Jenkins build failure on integration/test patches
Hi Karthika:
Are you using the right version of the snapshot in your pom files, because the maven metadata files does not exist on Nexus?
+Luis
Thanks,
Anil
Hi Karthika:
Are you using the right version of the snapshot in your pom files, because the maven metadata files does not exist on Nexus?
+Luis
Thanks,
Anil
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13081
·
|
|
Re: LISP Flow Mapping CSIT fix
Sorry for the lag Lori, it's merged now.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:13 AM Lori Jakab <lorand.jakab+odl@...> wrote:
Sorry for the lag Lori, it's merged now.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:13 AM Lori Jakab <lorand.jakab+odl@...> wrote:
|
By
Daniel Farrell
·
#13080
·
|
|
Re: LISP Flow Mapping CSIT fix
Sorry, I just saw there was an unanswered comment which I now answered.
Sorry, I just saw there was an unanswered comment which I now answered.
|
By
Lori Jakab <lorand.jakab+odl@...>
·
#13079
·
|