|
Re: Need help with stein image creation
Thanks Thanh,
I am able to see it is running
https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/builder-packer-merge-centos-7-devstack-pre-pip-stein/1/console.log.gz
But is fails
Thanks Thanh,
I am able to see it is running
https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/builder-packer-merge-centos-7-devstack-pre-pip-stein/1/console.log.gz
But is fails
|
By
JayaPr
·
#13723
·
|
|
[CSIT] NETVIRT-1569
Hi Faseela,
As discussed I have fixed the script for the JIRA NETVIRT-1569.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1569
git commit:
Hi Faseela,
As discussed I have fixed the script for the JIRA NETVIRT-1569.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1569
git commit:
|
By
Srinivas <srinivas.rachakonda@...>
·
#13722
·
|
|
Regarding sfc removal for sodium onwards.
Hi Jamo/Thanh,
As Faseela says
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/releng/autorelease/+/84544/
Faseela K
10:47 AM
↩
Patch Set 1:
The decision we had in TSC was to first stop running
Hi Jamo/Thanh,
As Faseela says
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/releng/autorelease/+/84544/
Faseela K
10:47 AM
↩
Patch Set 1:
The decision we had in TSC was to first stop running
|
By
JayaPr
·
#13721
·
|
|
Re: code review
Sorry for late response, see below:
This is the CSIT verify job to check the new test code does not break existing test and it normally runs on a stable version of the controller (should be
Sorry for late response, see below:
This is the CSIT verify job to check the new test code does not break existing test and it normally runs on a stable version of the controller (should be
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13720
·
|
|
Re: code review
Hi Luis/Guys,
I wander why Jenkins job is ran against fluorine when I upload the patch set? Is this correct? Shouldn't it pick master branch?
The second question is what do I need to do to test my
Hi Luis/Guys,
I wander why Jenkins job is ran against fluorine when I upload the patch set? Is this correct? Shouldn't it pick master branch?
The second question is what do I need to do to test my
|
By
mariusz.sobucki@est.tech <mariusz.sobucki@...>
·
#13719
·
|
|
Re: code review
Hi Luis/All,
Could anyone advise me in the below.
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/integration/test/+/84258/
My intention is that a system testsystem test job is triggered for test plan
Hi Luis/All,
Could anyone advise me in the below.
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/integration/test/+/84258/
My intention is that a system testsystem test job is triggered for test plan
|
By
mariusz.sobucki@est.tech <mariusz.sobucki@...>
·
#13718
·
|
|
Re: Need help with stein image creation
The job is designed to run once a month on the 1st automatically as well as kicks off a job on each merge. If the job was created after patches were merged then you'll have to merge a new patch to
The job is designed to run once a month on the 1st automatically as well as kicks off a job on each merge. If the job was created after patches were merged then you'll have to merge a new patch to
|
By
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...>
·
#13717
·
|
|
Need help with stein image creation
Hi Anil,
We have this job created in Jenkins but I don’t see it running and we are not getting any images
Hi Anil,
We have this job created in Jenkins but I don’t see it running and we are not getting any images
|
By
JayaPr
·
#13716
·
|
|
Re: code review
Hi Luis,
Thank you for help.
I had discussion with Ajay and CRUD-Action test suite should only run against magnesium branch at this moment.
I created new test plan netconf-userfeatures-magnesium.txt
Hi Luis,
Thank you for help.
I had discussion with Ajay and CRUD-Action test suite should only run against magnesium branch at this moment.
I created new test plan netconf-userfeatures-magnesium.txt
|
By
mariusz.sobucki@est.tech <mariusz.sobucki@...>
·
#13715
·
|
|
Re: code review
I am not sure what is difference between your local env and ODL CI but yes the RPC is failing with 404 code even when using latest sodium code (I added job to
I am not sure what is difference between your local env and ODL CI but yes the RPC is failing with 404 code even when using latest sodium code (I added job to
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13714
·
|
|
Re: code review
Hi Luis,Thank you for advise. Now Testtool starts ok 🙂. There are two test cases which fail though(see below). I am not sure what is the problem since they pass locally. Could you please
Hi Luis,Thank you for advise. Now Testtool starts ok 🙂. There are two test cases which fail though(see below). I am not sure what is the problem since they pass locally. Could you please
|
By
mariusz.sobucki@est.tech <mariusz.sobucki@...>
·
#13713
·
|
|
Re: [tsc][release] Configure Smart Proxy between ODL Nexus and Central
Hello Robert,
That's because we have forced a complete re-sync of everything in opendaylight-releases, just to make sure the missing release are all available. I believe I've bought it up earlier in
Hello Robert,
That's because we have forced a complete re-sync of everything in opendaylight-releases, just to make sure the missing release are all available. I believe I've bought it up earlier in
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13712
·
|
|
Re: SFC and Sodium
There's still Stephan's open patch https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netvirt/+/84369 so it hasn't been removed from NetVirt yet. Would require a respin of Sodium if we _really_ want to remove
There's still Stephan's open patch https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netvirt/+/84369 so it hasn't been removed from NetVirt yet. Would require a respin of Sodium if we _really_ want to remove
|
By
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...>
·
#13711
·
|
|
Re: SFC and Sodium
[+ direct emails to Jaime and David]
I find the timing of this highly irregular.
There is no pressing need to remove SFC at this point in time -- in fact
we have a ready-to-ship release and we are
[+ direct emails to Jaime and David]
I find the timing of this highly irregular.
There is no pressing need to remove SFC at this point in time -- in fact
we have a ready-to-ship release and we are
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13710
·
|
|
Re: [tsc][release] Configure Smart Proxy between ODL Nexus and Central
Hello again,
I would like to note that this activity has been successfully completed
(thanks Anil and the Sonatype folks).
There is one unforeseen side-effect of this: all of our artifacts
Hello again,
I would like to note that this activity has been successfully completed
(thanks Anil and the Sonatype folks).
There is one unforeseen side-effect of this: all of our artifacts
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13709
·
|
|
Re: [bgpcep-dev] Patch breaking test
Hello Luis,
Thank you for the analysis.
The fix is a very obvious one and was the result of interop testing. As
such, I did not realize the encoding checking was hard-coded in CSIT.
Sorry about
Hello Luis,
Thank you for the analysis.
The fix is a very obvious one and was the result of interop testing. As
such, I did not realize the encoding checking was hard-coded in CSIT.
Sorry about
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13708
·
|
|
Re: Netvirt is blocked : infra issue
Hello all:
Looks like a new version pyhton-cinderclient client to 5.0.0 is released, which is breaking the pip dependencies.
12:18:27 Instantiating compute client for API Version Major: 2, Minor:
Hello all:
Looks like a new version pyhton-cinderclient client to 5.0.0 is released, which is breaking the pip dependencies.
12:18:27 Instantiating compute client for API Version Major: 2, Minor:
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#13707
·
|
|
Re: SFC and Sodium
I added a kill-switch for the SFC dependency in NetVirt the last time
we ran into similar issues, so disabling SFC is
I added a kill-switch for the SFC dependency in NetVirt the last time
we ran into similar issues, so disabling SFC is
|
By
Stephen Kitt <skitt@...>
·
#13706
·
|
|
Re: SFC and Sodium
I think it's time to get SFC out of our managed projects list. It really
only remained all this time because of netvirt's dependency on it.
However, I don't know if we want to
I think it's time to get SFC out of our managed projects list. It really
only remained all this time because of netvirt's dependency on it.
However, I don't know if we want to
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13705
·
|
|
Re: Netvirt is blocked : infra issue
I cannot see the ticket but this is same issue detected yesterday:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13697
I cannot see the ticket but this is same issue detected yesterday:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13697
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13704
·
|