|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
The problem occurs if the RFC8040 is used
curl http://127.0.0.1:8181/rests/data/network-topology:network-topology -v
* Trying 127.0.0.1...
* Connected to 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) port 8181 (#0)
> GET
The problem occurs if the RFC8040 is used
curl http://127.0.0.1:8181/rests/data/network-topology:network-topology -v
* Trying 127.0.0.1...
* Connected to 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) port 8181 (#0)
> GET
|
By
Venkatrangan Govindarajan
·
#14378
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
Thanks Oleksii... IMHO, this issue is not a show stopper for Aluminium SR2 but please confirm
Thanks Oleksii... IMHO, this issue is not a show stopper for Aluminium SR2 but please confirm
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14377
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
Just downloaded SR2 and installed some project that uses topology model and executed this...
******************
curl http://127.0.0.1:8181/restconf/operational/network-topology:network-topology -v
*
Just downloaded SR2 and installed some project that uses topology model and executed this...
******************
curl http://127.0.0.1:8181/restconf/operational/network-topology:network-topology -v
*
|
By
Venkatrangan Govindarajan
·
#14376
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
As we agree, @Venkatrangan Govindarajan tested this issue NETCONF-753 and it seems to be resolved or not part of Aluminium SR2... @Luis Gomez please confirm that we can move forward with Aluminium
As we agree, @Venkatrangan Govindarajan tested this issue NETCONF-753 and it seems to be resolved or not part of Aluminium SR2... @Luis Gomez please confirm that we can move forward with Aluminium
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14375
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
It seems like we have to stop the Aluminium SR2 release after hearing the authentication issue from Robert.
It seems like we have to stop the Aluminium SR2 release after hearing the authentication issue from Robert.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14374
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
Thank you all.. @Luis Gomez please proceed with distribution at your earliest convenience
Thank you all.. @Luis Gomez please proceed with distribution at your earliest convenience
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14373
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
Hello,
I’ve proceeded to the TransportPCE release merge job for Aluminium SR2 which is tagged with version
Hello,
I’ve proceeded to the TransportPCE release merge job for Aluminium SR2 which is tagged with version
|
By
Gilles Thouenon
·
#14372
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
Hello
For more details, you can look at
Hello
For more details, you can look at
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#14371
·
|
|
global-jjb vs. packer vs. Jenkins jobs
Hello everyone,
as the (still current) failure to start Jenkins jobs shows, our current
way of integrating with external dependencies (global-jjb) is beyond
fragile.
The way our jobs work is
Hello everyone,
as the (still current) failure to start Jenkins jobs shows, our current
way of integrating with external dependencies (global-jjb) is beyond
fragile.
The way our jobs work is
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14370
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
Thanks Daniel.
On TransportPCE side, our stable/aluminium branch is ready. We encountered the same issue as
https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/theme/portal/2/IT-21406
to stage the
Thanks Daniel.
On TransportPCE side, our stable/aluminium branch is ready. We encountered the same issue as
https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/theme/portal/2/IT-21406
to stage the
|
By
Gilles Thouenon
·
#14369
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
Thanks Anil. TransportPCE team, please proceed at your earliest convenience.
Thanks Anil. TransportPCE team, please proceed at your earliest convenience.
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14368
·
|
|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR2 release status
Hello All,
OpenDaylight Aluminium SR2 version bump is complete and the staging repository is been promoted. The 'stable/aluminum' branch is unlocked and ready for development.
Pending activities that
Hello All,
OpenDaylight Aluminium SR2 version bump is complete and the staging repository is been promoted. The 'stable/aluminum' branch is unlocked and ready for development.
Pending activities that
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14367
·
|
|
CSIT jobs failing
FYI CSIT jobs are failing since yesterday due to cloud issues, I opened ticket here:
https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/theme/portal/2/IT-21053#
BR/Luis
FYI CSIT jobs are failing since yesterday due to cloud issues, I opened ticket here:
https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/theme/portal/2/IT-21053#
BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14366
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR1 release status
OK, I was not aware of this: the master (latest) download page mimics the last stable download page. Let me fix it then.
OK, I was not aware of this: the master (latest) download page mimics the last stable download page. Let me fix it then.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14365
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR1 release status
Yes i know but they usually have been identical when it comes to the downloads part of the documentation.. We only post what's downloadable today and not what's in the planning.. So I don't think we
Yes i know but they usually have been identical when it comes to the downloads part of the documentation.. We only post what's downloadable today and not what's in the planning.. So I don't think we
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14364
·
|
|
Re: reg: Need info on ODL system level testcases
Hi Shravani,
Thanks for reaching to the ODL community. See me comments in-line and let me know if you have further questions.
Test plans are maintained by project owners and can be updated at any
Hi Shravani,
Thanks for reaching to the ODL community. See me comments in-line and let me know if you have further questions.
Test plans are maintained by project owners and can be updated at any
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14363
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR1 release status
Because these are different branches:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/docs/+/93835
Because these are different branches:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/docs/+/93835
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14362
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR1 release status
Thanks Luis... That changed for stable Aluminium but didn't change latest...
https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/downloads.html
https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/stable-aluminium/downloads.html
Thanks Luis... That changed for stable Aluminium but didn't change latest...
https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/downloads.html
https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/stable-aluminium/downloads.html
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14361
·
|
|
reg: Need info on ODL system level testcases
Hi,
Iam writing this mail to understandthe ODL system level testcases.
I have gone through the CSIT testcasesand the framework
so my current understanding is for eachrelease of the ODL, the plugin
Hi,
Iam writing this mail to understandthe ODL system level testcases.
I have gone through the CSIT testcasesand the framework
so my current understanding is for eachrelease of the ODL, the plugin
|
By
Shravani N <shravani.n@...>
·
#14360
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Aluminium SR1 release status
OK, that is a simple patch:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/docs/+/93832
OK, that is a simple patch:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/docs/+/93832
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14359
·
|