|
Re: [E] Re: [integration-dev] integration/distribution version issues
AFAIK, TPCE is going to be managed from Sulfur or even Phosphorus so makes sense to consolidate to a single repo.
--
Daniel de la Rosa
ODL Release Manager
AFAIK, TPCE is going to be managed from Sulfur or even Phosphorus so makes sense to consolidate to a single repo.
--
Daniel de la Rosa
ODL Release Manager
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14558
·
|
|
Re: [E] Re: [integration-dev] integration/distribution version issues
BTW below I meant "consolidate back to single distribution".
BTW below I meant "consolidate back to single distribution".
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14557
·
|
|
Re: [E] Re: [integration-dev] integration/distribution version issues
I think the part that is confusing is to have 2 distros so different (life-cycle, release, tagging, etc) in the same repo, I remember we did this long time back because we wanted to avoid having a new
I think the part that is confusing is to have 2 distros so different (life-cycle, release, tagging, etc) in the same repo, I remember we did this long time back because we wanted to avoid having a new
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14556
·
|
|
Re: integration/distribution version issues
Just 2 things:
- The common distribution (opendaylight/pom.xml) has never been governed by auto-release or automatic bump for that matter, please recheck your links if you do not believe. Also the
Just 2 things:
- The common distribution (opendaylight/pom.xml) has never been governed by auto-release or automatic bump for that matter, please recheck your links if you do not believe. Also the
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14555
·
|
|
Re: [E] Re: [integration-dev] integration/distribution version issues
Regarding the version mismatch for the common release, what I meant was for the karaf version in 'opendaylight/pom.xml' and the other versions - for example, release tag '14.3.0' would have the karaf
Regarding the version mismatch for the common release, what I meant was for the karaf version in 'opendaylight/pom.xml' and the other versions - for example, release tag '14.3.0' would have the karaf
|
By
Sangwook Ha
·
#14554
·
|
|
Re: [E] Re: [integration-dev] integration/distribution version issues
Looking at the release & version bump cycle, some of the steps may be simplified, and hopefully automated:
- For each release of managed projects, release & version bump, are done separately a few
Looking at the release & version bump cycle, some of the steps may be simplified, and hopefully automated:
- For each release of managed projects, release & version bump, are done separately a few
|
By
Sangwook Ha
·
#14553
·
|
|
Re: integration/distribution version issues
Three, actually.
Yes, and therefore the release lifecycle of int/dist is unlike any other project I have come across.
Right-o, but unfortunately you are explaining something completely off-topic, so
Three, actually.
Yes, and therefore the release lifecycle of int/dist is unlike any other project I have come across.
Right-o, but unfortunately you are explaining something completely off-topic, so
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14552
·
|
|
Re: integration/distribution version issues
I thought this was clear, at least to ODL old folks, the int/dist project holds 2 distributions:
- Karaf distribution (karaf/pom.xml) only containing Managed projects is also a Managed project and
I thought this was clear, at least to ODL old folks, the int/dist project holds 2 distributions:
- Karaf distribution (karaf/pom.xml) only containing Managed projects is also a Managed project and
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14551
·
|
|
Re: integration/distribution version issues
This boils down to interaction between autorelease and int/dist.
autorelease assumes branch cutting involves bumping minor version, which has been true for all MSI projects since forever.
int/dist
This boils down to interaction between autorelease and int/dist.
autorelease assumes branch cutting involves bumping minor version, which has been true for all MSI projects since forever.
int/dist
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14550
·
|
|
Re: integration/distribution version issues
Let me add more Robert and team to make sure that they see this email
Let me add more Robert and team to make sure that they see this email
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14549
·
|
|
integration/distribution version issues
It appears that the versions in integration/distribution/opendaylight have not been updated, and some Jenkins jobs are failing: e.g. openflowplugin-csit-1node-sanity-only-sulfur
I submitted two
It appears that the versions in integration/distribution/opendaylight have not been updated, and some Jenkins jobs are failing: e.g. openflowplugin-csit-1node-sanity-only-sulfur
I submitted two
|
By
Sangwook Ha
·
#14548
·
|
|
Re: [it-infrastructure-alerts][notice] ODL maintenance window (11:00pm Sun, Nov 14 - 3:30am Mon, Nov 15 UTC)
Hello all,
ODL maintenance window is complete. All services are back online! Thank you for your patience.
Regards,
Anil
Hello all,
ODL maintenance window is complete. All services are back online! Thank you for your patience.
Regards,
Anil
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14547
·
|
|
Re: [it-infrastructure-alerts][notice] ODL maintenance window (11:00pm Sun, Nov 14 - 3:30am Mon, Nov 15 UTC)
Hello all,
We had an internal review on the estimates, and it's been advised we require a larger window than estimated (increased by 2 hours) since we have large volumes to be taken offline and moved
Hello all,
We had an internal review on the estimates, and it's been advised we require a larger window than estimated (increased by 2 hours) since we have large volumes to be taken offline and moved
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14546
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon SR3 release status
Thanks everyone, here is the distribution release: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/14.3.0/
BR/Luis
Thanks everyone, here is the distribution release: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/14.3.0/
BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14545
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon SR3 release status
Well, that's true, but then spinning a new release of a single project is quite straightforward, so TPCE can run as fast as kernel projects are integrated into int/dist -- it even could become an MRI
Well, that's true, but then spinning a new release of a single project is quite straightforward, so TPCE can run as fast as kernel projects are integrated into int/dist -- it even could become an MRI
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#14544
·
|
|
[it-infrastructure-alerts][notice] ODL maintenance window (11:00pm Sun, Nov 14 - 3:30am Mon, Nov 15 UTC)
What: LF will perform maintenance on ODL services.
When: 11:00pm Sun, Nov 14 - 3:30am Mon, Nov 15 UTC (10:00am Mon, Nov 15 - 2:30pm Mon, Nov 15 AEDT)
Why: ODL Services (Jenkins, Nexus) some of LVM's
What: LF will perform maintenance on ODL services.
When: 11:00pm Sun, Nov 14 - 3:30am Mon, Nov 15 UTC (10:00am Mon, Nov 15 - 2:30pm Mon, Nov 15 AEDT)
Why: ODL Services (Jenkins, Nexus) some of LVM's
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14543
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon SR3 release status
Thanks Luis, and in that case, please proceed to release Silicon SR3 at your earliest convenience
Thank you all
Thanks Luis, and in that case, please proceed to release Silicon SR3 at your earliest convenience
Thank you all
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14542
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon SR3 release status
The release actually happened before the other projects because TPCE does not depend anymore on MSI projects. For future, I would still recommend TPCE to wait for the TSC release approval, otherwise
The release actually happened before the other projects because TPCE does not depend anymore on MSI projects. For future, I would still recommend TPCE to wait for the TSC release approval, otherwise
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14541
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon SR3 release status
HI Gilles,
This is from the other email thread.... The logs you show below are for a normal merge job that does not publish release artifacts but SNAPSHOT. So in short, you have bumped TPCE to use
HI Gilles,
This is from the other email thread.... The logs you show below are for a normal merge job that does not publish release artifacts but SNAPSHOT. So in short, you have bumped TPCE to use
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14540
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon SR3 release status
Hi Daniel,
Shweta released TransportPCE SR3 last week.
Please see the following log :https://s3-logs.opendaylight.org/logs/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/transportpce-release-merge/23/
At first
Hi Daniel,
Shweta released TransportPCE SR3 last week.
Please see the following log :https://s3-logs.opendaylight.org/logs/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/transportpce-release-merge/23/
At first
|
By
Gilles Thouenon
·
#14539
·
|