|
Integration new committers
OK people, you heard Andrew, have any of you any objection on adding Moiz and Huang to the list of committers for Integration project?
Thanks
Luis
OK people, you heard Andrew, have any of you any objection on adding Moiz and Huang to the list of committers for Integration project?
Thanks
Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#1
·
|
|
Re: Integration new committers
+1 for adding them.
By
Liguangpeng (Roc, IPTechnologyResearchDept&HW) <guangpeng.li@...>
·
#2
·
|
|
Re: Integration new committers
+1!
By
Baohua Yang <yangbaohua@...>
·
#3
·
|
|
Re: Integration new committers
No objections.
By
Carol Sanders <carol.sanders@...>
·
#5
·
|
|
Re: Integration new committers
No objections.
By
Punal Patel <Punal.Patel@...>
·
#4
·
|
|
Re: Integration new committers
+1
Ed
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#6
·
|
|
Re: Integration new committers
+1 for both.
Great additions.
Regards,
Swaraj
> From: luis.gomez@...
> To: eaw@...; carol.sanders@...; swarajv@...; punal.patel@...; guangpeng.li@...; yangbaohua@...; moraja@...; huangdenghui@...
>
+1 for both.
Great additions.
Regards,
Swaraj
> From: luis.gomez@...
> To: eaw@...; carol.sanders@...; swarajv@...; punal.patel@...; guangpeng.li@...; yangbaohua@...; moraja@...; huangdenghui@...
>
|
By
Swaraj Vinjapuri
·
#7
·
|
|
Testing tools VMs
Greetings folks,
So last week there was a request for new VMs for doing black box
testing.
I understand we're talking about 5 systems. What I've seen is the
following:
VM1: Test management
Greetings folks,
So last week there was a request for new VMs for doing black box
testing.
I understand we're talking about 5 systems. What I've seen is the
following:
VM1: Test management
|
By
Andrew Grimberg
·
#8
·
|
|
Re: Testing tools VMs
Hi Andrew, I will discuss your questions more in detail with Carol but so far this is my idea for the VMs networking:
1) IP interfaces:
The VMs need 1 IP interface that can be used for both:
Hi Andrew, I will discuss your questions more in detail with Carol but so far this is my idea for the VMs networking:
1) IP interfaces:
The VMs need 1 IP interface that can be used for both:
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#9
·
|
|
Re: Testing tools VMs
I agree with all items mentioned with additional consideration: I like to have a separate management interface on each VM than what I'm using for test traffic. Is it possible to have two or three
I agree with all items mentioned with additional consideration: I like to have a separate management interface on each VM than what I'm using for test traffic. Is it possible to have two or three
|
By
Carol Sanders <carol.sanders@...>
·
#10
·
|
|
Re: Testing tools VMs
Hi Carol,
That makes sense to me too, so we can have 2 interfaces per VM:
- Test traffic interface: to connect to other test VM. This is on a private subnet shared only by the VMs and does not need
Hi Carol,
That makes sense to me too, so we can have 2 interfaces per VM:
- Test traffic interface: to connect to other test VM. This is on a private subnet shared only by the VMs and does not need
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#11
·
|
|
TestON
Hi Carol,
Today I learned through the TWS call that people from ON.LAB (http://onlab.us) are developing another kind (OS based) of SDN controller called ONOS. It happens that they use a test
Hi Carol,
Today I learned through the TWS call that people from ON.LAB (http://onlab.us) are developing another kind (OS based) of SDN controller called ONOS. It happens that they use a test
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#12
·
|
|
Status on integration repo distribution directories
Guys,
I had promised distributions for the editions in integration by Monday. I hit some road bumps
around artifacts being available in nexus (which I'm working with projects to fix).
Or to put it
Guys,
I had promised distributions for the editions in integration by Monday. I hit some road bumps
around artifacts being available in nexus (which I'm working with projects to fix).
Or to put it
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#13
·
|
|
Re: TestON
Yes I will take a look today.
Thanks,
Carol
Yes I will take a look today.
Thanks,
Carol
|
By
Carol Sanders <carol.sanders@...>
·
#14
·
|
|
Re: Status on integration repo distribution directories
Thanks very much Ed.
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#15
·
|
|
Re: TestON
Yes Luis, I was present at the TWS call as well. ON.LAB Preso was awesome.
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/images/d/dc/ONOS_ODL_TechTalkv7.pptx
the webx recording link is at
Yes Luis, I was present at the TWS call as well. ON.LAB Preso was awesome.
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/images/d/dc/ONOS_ODL_TechTalkv7.pptx
the webx recording link is at
|
By
Swaraj Vinjapuri
·
#16
·
|
|
Re: TestON
I would love to be able to demo results of some of our test way On Labs did graphically.
It’s probably too much to implement for our current milestone dates but we could perhaps plan to
I would love to be able to demo results of some of our test way On Labs did graphically.
It’s probably too much to implement for our current milestone dates but we could perhaps plan to
|
By
Carol Sanders <carol.sanders@...>
·
#17
·
|
|
Please update vtn-verify and vtn-merge to support Release Vehicles
As part of putting together the release vehicles for ODL (Base, Virtualization, Service Provider) I am
constructing distribution directories for each flavor in the integration project.
When I
As part of putting together the release vehicles for ODL (Base, Virtualization, Service Provider) I am
constructing distribution directories for each flavor in the integration project.
When I
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#18
·
|
|
Re: Please update vtn-verify and vtn-merge to support Release Vehicles
I realized when trying to build your manager/commons that it suffers from an issue around the use of
<configLocation>
${project.parent.basedir}/checkstyle.xml
I realized when trying to build your manager/commons that it suffers from an issue around the use of
<configLocation>
${project.parent.basedir}/checkstyle.xml
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#19
·
|
|
Please publish Defense4All artifacts so they can be included in Simultaneous Release Vehicles
Guys,
Right now there are no artifacts for groupid org.opendaylight.defense4all innexus.opendaylight.org,
which means I can't include them in the Release Vehicle (what we will actually be releasing)
Guys,
Right now there are no artifacts for groupid org.opendaylight.defense4all innexus.opendaylight.org,
which means I can't include them in the Release Vehicle (what we will actually be releasing)
|
By
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
·
#20
·
|