|
Re: CSIT test tools
Thanks punal and luis!
It is a good lib that uses the python requests library and provides api for the robot framework.
The lib was evaluated before we try to find other solutions, and we think it a
Thanks punal and luis!
It is a good lib that uses the python requests library and provides api for the robot framework.
The lib was evaluated before we try to find other solutions, and we think it a
|
By
Baohua Yang <yangbaohua@...>
·
#201
·
|
|
Re: CSIT test tools
I like the word “test” on integration root, now what are the things we will have under test?
Maybe tools that can be used by any test (like your scripts) and then the test themselves (CSIT,
I like the word “test” on integration root, now what are the things we will have under test?
Maybe tools that can be used by any test (like your scripts) and then the test themselves (CSIT,
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#202
·
|
|
Re: CSIT test tools
Hi all,
I have tried simple test case “get topology” with robot request library and it also works pretty neat:
*** Settings ***
Library Collections
Library RequestsLibrary
Hi all,
I have tried simple test case “get topology” with robot request library and it also works pretty neat:
*** Settings ***
Library Collections
Library RequestsLibrary
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#203
·
|
|
Re: CSIT test tools
In general I think both ways have their pros and cons: Custom libraries are very powerful but I also feel we miss the test definition concept in Robot, i.e. all the test is defined in Python and we
In general I think both ways have their pros and cons: Custom libraries are very powerful but I also feel we miss the test definition concept in Robot, i.e. all the test is defined in Python and we
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#204
·
|
|
Test Tools discussion tomorrow
Hi all,
See details for the meeting tomorrow Thursday 6:30 PM (US) / Friday 9:30 AM (China). You have a list of International free numbers below.
JOIN THE AUDIO CONFERENCE
Passcode: 8877 8903#
For
Hi all,
See details for the meeting tomorrow Thursday 6:30 PM (US) / Friday 9:30 AM (China). You have a list of International free numbers below.
JOIN THE AUDIO CONFERENCE
Passcode: 8877 8903#
For
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#205
·
|
|
Problems with CSIT_Test code
Hi Baohua,
I try to run the code following the wiki athttps://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:CSIT_Test_Tools , finally, I got some failures as follows. Can you tell me
Hi Baohua,
I try to run the code following the wiki athttps://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:CSIT_Test_Tools , finally, I got some failures as follows. Can you tell me
|
By
Liguangpeng (Roc, IPTechnologyResearchDept&HW) <guangpeng.li@...>
·
#206
·
|
|
Re: Problems with CSIT_Test code
Hi guangpeng.
Do you follow the instructions exactly? And is the controller runing at linux platform?
Seems the controller does not response normally.
Can you do a clean run (just start
Hi guangpeng.
Do you follow the instructions exactly? And is the controller runing at linux platform?
Seems the controller does not response normally.
Can you do a clean run (just start
|
By
Baohua Yang <yangbaohua@...>
·
#207
·
|
|
Re: Problems with CSIT_Test code
Hi Baohua,
I tried again, follow is my steps:
0/ modify controller default ip in ‘restlib.py’ file.
1/start controller(IP 10.125.136.52) $sudo ./run.sh
2/start mininet $ sudo mn
Hi Baohua,
I tried again, follow is my steps:
0/ modify controller default ip in ‘restlib.py’ file.
1/start controller(IP 10.125.136.52) $sudo ./run.sh
2/start mininet $ sudo mn
|
By
Liguangpeng (Roc, IPTechnologyResearchDept&HW) <guangpeng.li@...>
·
#208
·
|
|
Re: Problems with CSIT_Test code
Skip steps 3 & 4 and it will work.
Skip steps 3 & 4 and it will work.
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#210
·
|
|
Re: Problems with CSIT_Test code
Please follow the instructions at https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=CrossProject:Integration_Group:CSIT_Test_Tools.
There are no requirements on step 3) and 4) currently, thanks!
Please follow the instructions at https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=CrossProject:Integration_Group:CSIT_Test_Tools.
There are no requirements on step 3) and 4) currently, thanks!
|
By
Baohua Yang <yangbaohua@...>
·
#209
·
|
|
Re: Problems with CSIT_Test code
Yes, It works. And I updated the wiki (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:CSIT_Test_Tools) by adding step1 . Baohua can check it and correct it if necessary.
Yes, It works. And I updated the wiki (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:CSIT_Test_Tools) by adding step1 . Baohua can check it and correct it if necessary.
|
By
Liguangpeng (Roc, IPTechnologyResearchDept&HW) <guangpeng.li@...>
·
#212
·
|
|
Re: CSIT test tools
Dear team members
I just created the test directory as discussed, and add the first version stable code.
Please help review in https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/2479/.
Besides, I
Dear team members
I just created the test directory as discussed, and add the first version stable code.
Please help review in https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/2479/.
Besides, I
|
By
Baohua Yang <yangbaohua@...>
·
#211
·
|
|
Re: Problems with CSIT_Test code
Thanks guangpeng!
Welcome for further improvement!
Thanks guangpeng!
Welcome for further improvement!
|
By
Baohua Yang <yangbaohua@...>
·
#213
·
|
|
Re: CSIT test tools
OK, now you have your code reviewed and hopefully merged to Master. The build that you are talking is totally unnecessary when we push test code, we need to work on a new Jenkins strategy for our
OK, now you have your code reviewed and hopefully merged to Master. The build that you are talking is totally unnecessary when we push test code, we need to work on a new Jenkins strategy for our
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#214
·
|
|
Re: System Test for BGP/PCEP
Hi Luis,
python code for PCEP client was successfully merged in bgpcep repository.
Regards,
Dana
Hi Luis,
python code for PCEP client was successfully merged in bgpcep repository.
Regards,
Dana
|
By
Dana Kutenicsova -X (dkutenic - Pantheon Technologies SRO@Cisco) <dkutenic@...>
·
#215
·
|
|
Re: System Test for BGP/PCEP
Very good thanks, we will take a look on this.
Very good thanks, we will take a look on this.
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#216
·
|
|
Re: CSIT test tools
Hi, members.
Before the meeting (10:30 AM in China), there're two things need to clarify here.
1) robot is too simple in logic processing to handle the ODP test. That's why there're
Hi, members.
Before the meeting (10:30 AM in China), there're two things need to clarify here.
1) robot is too simple in logic processing to handle the ODP test. That's why there're
|
By
Baohua Yang <yangbaohua@...>
·
#217
·
|
|
Test tools discussion
Hi all,
This is what we discussed today in our Thursday test tools meeting:
- Robot framework is the best candidate to manage the system test. We still need to evaluate TestON
Hi all,
This is what we discussed today in our Thursday test tools meeting:
- Robot framework is the best candidate to manage the system test. We still need to evaluate TestON
|
By
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
·
#218
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Test tools discussion
Agree 100%.
Thanks everyone's effort!
Agree 100%.
Thanks everyone's effort!
|
By
Baohua Yang <yangbaohua@...>
·
#219
·
|
|
Re: Test tools discussion
It is inspiring. Welcome more and more people to contribute.J
Guangpeng
It is inspiring. Welcome more and more people to contribute.J
Guangpeng
|
By
Liguangpeng (Roc, IPTechnologyResearchDept&HW) <guangpeng.li@...>
·
#220
·
|